Expert: We must act fast on warming

BG is a troll, litesong, get over it -- trolls design their communications to attempt to do exactly what he's done to you -- don't feed the troll(s) -- if you can't stand the troll emotion, get out of the troll cage, go to a happy thread

Cousin Jethro wrote:

if you can't stand the troll emotion, get out of the troll cage, go to a happy thread

If I couldn't stand Brian_G, I would have left. That's what Brian_G wants me to do. Here's my answer......

Brian_G is a liar. Brian_G is a 4-time alleged threatener, an alleged verbal stalker & intimidates by alleged mention of my wife.

Marie wrote:

I like that "Dirtling" name - suits ya'.

I like Dirtling too....except it demeans dirt.

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
I like Dirtling too....except it demeans dirt.

Oh, yeah. I forgot.......

Brian_G is a liar. Brian_G is a 4-time alleged threatener, an alleged verbal stalker & intimidates by alleged mention of my wife.

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, yeah. I forgot.......
Brian_G is a liar. Brian_G is a 4-time alleged threatener, an alleged verbal stalker & intimidates by alleged mention of my wife.

Feeling intimidated by alleged mention sounds like a symptom of mental illness;)

MattJ wrote:

<quoted text>
Feeling intimidated by alleged mention sounds like a symptom of mental illness;)

Let someone threaten you several times, then verbally stalk you to your place, & then make mention of your wife.

I thought the picture was obvious MattJ. Hope the personalization clarifies Brian_G's alleged intent.

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Let someone threaten you several times, then verbally stalk you to your place, & then make mention of your wife.

All of which you yourself belittle with your misuse of the word 'alleged'.

THAT is what should have been obvious to you for some time now.

More whine?

MattJ wrote:

All of which you yourself belittle with your misuse of the word 'alleged'.
THAT is what should have been obvious to you for some time now.

My goodness, we agree on something!

MattJ wrote:

Feeling intimidated by alleged mention sounds like a symptom of mental illness;)

Make that two items!

As well as giving me the best laugh of the day, with "STOP GLOBAL WAR," things are looking up all round.

We may soon agree that it's impossible to, "act fast on global warming."

Marie wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL - you forget -we've seen your picture.

Brian_G did you post a picture of yourseld on line?

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Let someone threaten you several times, then verbally stalk you to your place, & then make mention of your wife.
I thought the picture was obvious MattJ. Hope the personalization clarifies Brian_G's alleged intent.

I've asked before and received no answer. How does one anomymous poster "stalk" another anomymous poster?

How does one anomyous poster "threaten" another anomymous poster?

Are you so devoid of social interaction in your daily life that you must constantly re-post this nonsense over and over again?

Since this is a global warming forum, why not try to participate in the "discussion".

Brian_G wrote:

More whine?

To match your pathetic "machismo".

Brian_G wrote:

More whine?

Brian_G is a liar. Brian_G is a 4-time alleged threatener, an alleged verbal stalker & intimidates by mentioning my spouse.

MattJ wrote:

<quoted text>
All of which you yourself belittle with your misuse of the word 'alleged'.

Use of the word 'allege' is legal.

litesong wrote:

intimidates by mentioning my spouse.

Should be corrected to 'intimidates by allegedly mentioning my spouse.'

Think about it wrote:

<quoted text>
I've asked before and received no answer. How does one anomymous poster "stalk" another anomymous poster?
How does one anomyous poster "threaten" another anomymous poster?
Are you so devoid of social interaction in your daily life that you must constantly re-post this nonsense over and over again?
Since this is a global warming forum, why not try to participate in the "discussion".

Look I got little pictures! Reminds me of first grade classroom stickers, the kids really like stickers.

Earthling wrote:

<quoted text>That's debatable, the truth is only what you believe to be true.

Ahh. That explains you. You "wish real hard" and what you wish for become reality. Typical delusional psychosis. Perhaps schizoid.

Sane people know that truth aka facts don't change. Our understanding of them does. And scince is the ONLY objective means of getting at the 'truth' of the natural world.

mememine69 wrote:

<quoted text>
So you can control enough to lower. You are a childish and argumentative troll from hell now.

To AFFECT something is not to control it. You really really need to start over with some science courses this time. Advanced basket weaving didn't give you much background.

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
Ahh. That explains you. You "wish real hard" and what you wish for become reality. Typical delusional psychosis. Perhaps schizoid.
Sane people know that truth aka facts don't change. Our understanding of them does. And scince is the ONLY objective means of getting at the 'truth' of the natural world.

The paid consultants in lab coats say the task of measuring and understanding the extraordinarily complex climate systems has made the science “clear”and it’s not what to believe but rather whom to believe. We deniers of the 23 year old theory say if the science is so clear, we all then possess the ability to interpret the facts and theories ourselves.
Here are the denier’s observed facts:
-A policy of precaution is not science, its superstition.
-Just shy of a quarter of a century of failed IPCC predictions certainly disproves the theory.
-La Nina is stronger than all of Global Warming’s magical powers.
-Melting ice does not prove CO2 is at fault?
-Our cooling clear blue sky disproves the theory.
-10 years of NOAA cooling disproves the theory.
-Resulting cooling disproves predicted warming.

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
Use of the word 'allege' is legal.

But you are misusing it. That does not afford you any legal protection.