Should evolution be taught in high school?

Psychology wrote:

<quoted text>
Is believing in ET any different?
Look at man and tell us what you see. Look at man and tell us what you would like to see.
Why would you like to see such?
What good comes from what you see, what you would like to see and most importantly, why?
What is man capable of, if done for the right reasons in the correct manner?
Perhaps I should say, what isn't possible, neh?

Psychology wrote:

As you say, the priests, preachers and rabbi's, brainwash their flocks, just as the gov brainwashes most all, save a tiny few that are hated, because they refuse to believe that man must be so stupid, immoral and prideful, even though we are all challenged. When one does for others, they do for themselves and their children.
Do you see one thing good in government? If so, can you defend what you claim, if you do?

Psychology wrote:

Here's more children! Say bye bye to Einsteins general relativity in this respect.
Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts.
Read morons, read.
http://www.esa.int/esaMI/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.ht...

Psychology wrote:

Here's more children! Say bye bye to Einsteins general relativity in this respect.
Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts.
Read morons, read.
http://www.esa.int/esaMI/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.ht...

Psychology wrote:

Since the dawn of time man has believed in a higher power.

Mugwump wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually was hoping to get his population growth formula out of him, but he kept stalling.
Am guessing he will have forgotten when he returns
Still be on his list though

Psychology wrote:

I'm sorry children, did you say something?
A non-zero graviton mass in a superconductor leads to a gravitomagnetic London moment, which has the same form as the one required solving Tate’s Cooper-pair mass anomaly./--------
""""if Tate’s measurement is correct and quantum theory holds, the Cooper-pair mass difference in her experiment is a direct sign for a graviton mass which is 14 orders of magnitude larger than its free-space value. """"------ ----
This then explains why gravitomagnetic fields generated by rotating superconductors in fact can be much larger than the classical ones from non-coherent matter.
Although gravitomagnetic fields based on Tate’s result are still small, they should be detectable within a laboratory environment. The theoretical basis outlined in this paper shall provide a basis for further experimental and theoretical research on gravitational properties of superconductors.

Portal wrote:

<quoted text>The human animal is a product of its environment....monkey see, monkey do. The human mind is easily molded based on nothing more than wanting to be accepted and loved. The "cult" is the norm.

Psychology wrote:

Here's more children! Say bye bye to Einsteins general relativity in this respect.
Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts.
Read morons, read.
http://www.esa.int/esaMI/GSP/SEM0L6OVGJE_0.ht...

Dogen wrote:

<quoted text>
His population growth formula and it debunking can be found on talkorigins.org
Or more specifically:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB620.h...

Dogen wrote:

I hope everyone is enjoying UC's holiday.
I know I am.

thewordofme wrote:

<quoted text>
Says who??

Mugwump wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah, but UC refuses to look at TO as its all 'darwinist rubbish' according to him anyway.
Have been pushing him to back up his stance (as its one of his 99 reasons) but so far he has stalled, asking me to agree the data set, insisting that whether birth/mortality rates change is unimportant etc.
All he really needs to do is post his formula and some numbers - but suspect that is why he is stalling as the problems are to obvious.
The hilarious thing is HIS OWN set of data he wants to use - quotes a population of 4M in -10,000 BC !!!!!!!! And he wants to use it to justify a 6K old earth !!!!!!!
Sometimes he plunges to jimbo levels of nonsense as he tries to justify his position
But we will see, he insists he want to see the point through and miracles DO happen (whoops)

Psychology wrote:

I'm sorry children, did you say something?
A non-zero graviton mass in a superconductor leads to a gravitomagnetic London moment, which has the same form as the one required solving Tate’s Cooper-pair mass anomaly./--------
""""if Tate’s measurement is correct and quantum theory holds, the Cooper-pair mass difference in her experiment is a direct sign for a graviton mass which is 14 orders of magnitude larger than its free-space value. """"------ ----
This then explains why gravitomagnetic fields generated by rotating superconductors in fact can be much larger than the classical ones from non-coherent matter.
Although gravitomagnetic fields based on Tate’s result are still small, they should be detectable within a laboratory environment. The theoretical basis outlined in this paper shall provide a basis for further experimental and theoretical research on gravitational properties of superconductors.

Judged:

1

1

Psychology wrote:

How did man come to any god? If man did not come to god, what then?
Did cave man believe in god?

Judged:

1

1

Psychology wrote:

Let's see now children, what would such knowledge be used for? How about rocket propulsion, possibly cars, as a kind of shielding in many different applications and more, right??
If they were able to do one of these, which do you think the public would demand? Autos would be the first demanded by the public. How would all the oil co's feel? Do you think they would let that happen? I'm sorry, you children aren't expected to think.