|
Robert
United States
|
truthist wrote: <quoted text>First, I am NOT MattJ. Let me say you wrote a miserably poor post. I culled the above portion to address here. What would you consider as proof? What do you call anything concrete? You see science is a continuum. In a limited space as in a Topix post, how musch one can tell to people unknown asking or demanding or cursing? One has to interpret what the person is seeking. In your case, it is obvious you don't know any science. You are unaducated and unable to write in good language what you are trying to communicate. Futhermore, you are using the designated words of the AGW deniers like proof or concrete. All in all, you are a michief-maker. I have no idea why you have chosen this path instead of one of reason and science. Remember: AGW is REAL. We must reduce CO2 emissions for our own good. You are calling me uneducated! You are the one who is having a problem with the spelling! Do I need to send you a 3rd grade spelling book?
|
|
Robert
United States
|
Truthist you know your computer has spell check right? You might want to turn it on. You might not look so stupid!
|
|
MattJ
San Jose, CA
|
mememine69 wrote: <quoted text> Excellent point and the weather over the last 23 years of climate for the theory proves that global warming was a huge mistake. It proves no such thing, as is obvious from the graph: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature... . The global average temperature known as 'hadcrut3' has been INCREASING over that time.
|
|
MattJ
San Jose, CA
|
Robert wrote: Truthist you know your computer has spell check right? You might want to turn it on. You might not look so stupid! And when did you figure out how to turn it on? How did you come up with 'htink' in http://www.topix.net/forum/news/global-warmin... ??
|
|
“EnvironMENTAList ”
Joined: Feb 2, 2007
Comments: 7418
Near Detroit
ISP:
Saint Thomas, Canada
|
MattJ wrote: <quoted text> It proves no such thing, as is obvious from the graph: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature... . The global average temperature known as 'hadcrut3' has been INCREASING over that time. No no no no. You have your favorite site and I have my dear NOAA site. I like the NOAA's stats better than yours. Na na na na Naaaaaaa na. Say, have you seen this climate crisis for yourself?
|
|
Cousin Jethro
Leesburg, FL
|
|
|
“EnvironMENTAList ”
Joined: Feb 2, 2007
Comments: 7418
Near Detroit
ISP:
Saint Thomas, Canada
|
Cousin Jethro wrote: Since they say both, what does that tell you? And how does melting prove anything let alone what causes it. You are now one step closer to being a realist: a denier. Here is a bonus point for you: Almost all, if not all, of the research money spent on GWing research is spent on effects, not causes. Global warming deniers are not anti pollution. We know the theoery is wrong and leading envioronmentalism down an irresponsible road. Stay tuned or get ahead of the curve because we are correct. You warmies are dead wrong. Show me the crisis.
|
|
Robert
United States
|
|
|
|
truthist
Houston, TX
|
Robert wrote: <quoted text> You are calling me uneducated! You are the one who is having a problem with the spelling! Do I need to send you a 3rd grade spelling book? Oh you mean you caught "much" was musch. Very good. You now pass the 2nd grade. You can use the book you offered next year.. unless you want to use it over the Summer. I was judging your education by not your typo(s) but by your ideas and concepts and your use of the language and grammar. For example, you wrote: "But have not went to one link you have left." I am glad we had this talk together.
|
|
truthist
Houston, TX
|
Robert wrote: Truthist you know your computer has spell check right? You might want to turn it on. You might not look so stupid! Do you take your own advice? Besides, you need more than that: a writer to post for you. Robert, if you worry about looking stupid, you should NOT have posted this one. I am glad we had this talk together.
|
|
Mothra
Portland, OR
|
truthist wrote: <quoted text>Oh you mean you caught "much" was musch. Very good. You now pass the 2nd grade. You can use the book you offered next year.. unless you want to use it over the Summer. I was judging your education by not your typo(s) but by your ideas and concepts and your use of the language and grammar. For example, you wrote: "But have not went to one link you have left." I am glad we had this talk together. See post 1903: "unaducated"? "michief"? "...unable to write in good language what you are trying to communicate." Yikes! Great lesson. Keep up the gud work!
|
|
Mothra
Portland, OR
|
Robert wrote: Truthist you know your computer has spell check right? You might want to turn it on. You might not look so stupid! Spell check won't help her with that.
|
|
MattJ
San Jose, CA
|
Mothra wrote: <quoted text> See post 1903: "unaducated"? "michief"? "...unable to write in good language what you are trying to communicate." Yikes! Great lesson. Keep up the gud work! Well, yes, she should use the spell-checker in her browser. But the difference between you and her is: her posts really will be vastly improved by that. Yours will not be. For both the thoughts you express and the language you express it in are hopelessly base.
|
|
“Climate Realist”
Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Comments: 12208
Eichstätt, Germany
|
They don't understand climate, they think they are working with average weather, that if all of Earth's surface is measured and combined they have some new information about climate. The problem is, when you average temperatures, you lose information, not gain it. If you take the temperature in to cities, New York and Los Angeles, and average them, you don't have more information, instead the average tells you about an imaginary, nonexistent place. In any case, it's cooling now and the warmists don't like that.
|
|
Fun Facts
AOL
|
Cousin Jethro wrote: And 46 states had record low temperatures in June. http://iceagenow.com/Record_low_temperatures_...
|
|
MattJ
San Jose, CA
|
Brian_G wrote: In any case, it's cooling now and the warmists don't like that. The cooling was never global, and is over now. El Niņo has begun.
|
|
Earthling
Elda, Spain
|
MattJ wrote: The cooling was never global, and is over now. El Niņo has begun. So you're happy as long as warming is back, even if it's caused by an El Niņo event? How sad is that.
|
|
Fun Facts
AOL
|
Judged:
1
The warming was never global, mostly in northern asia.
|
|
Mothra
Portland, OR
|
Earthling wrote: <quoted text>So you're happy as long as warming is back, even if it's caused by an El Niņo event? How sad is that. Agreed. Matt is sad.
|
|
MattJ
San Jose, CA
|
Mothra wrote: <quoted text> Agreed. Matt is sad. Of course, both of you are wrong, and not just about this. Only your insane inability to READ, inflicted by your own insane bias, could lead either of you to think I was happy about the return to warming.
|
|
|