I agree completely. Worst case was Khan(on no not the great Khan debate). The Pakistani who developed their bomb. Muslim terrorist who not only believes devoutly in his creator but believe in 72 virgins as his reward for taking out Israel. Lets hope his preferred weapon is not biologic. The joining of science and religion could be horrific. Whats up with 72 virgins, I want one girl who knows what she is doing<quoted text>
You don't realllly want me to go into the subjects of religious wars, tyranny, slavery, witch-hunts, inquisitions and conquests etc. etc. etc?
Religion, science, big muscles, a weapon, a talent with language, charisma, information withheld, warped or disseminated are powerful things that can be used, have been used and will be used for great good and great evil. That being said, and science being relatively new to humanity, do you honestly think science has done more in the material world for humanity or religion?
There is nothing on this planet more monstrously terrifying than people caught up in the hysteria and madness of religious passion, believing that their ONE TRUE faith demands or permits the exploitation or elimination of other human beings.
Washington
Intelligent Design: Coming To A State Legislature Near You
- Posted in the Washington Forum
Comments (Page 262)
|
|
|
Yeah, as a lawyer might respond to an objection to their action it court: "Goes to motive." That is, what people can DO is determined by their motives. If they use knowledge gained through science to accomplish their goal, this doesn't make science the cause of their immoral action. Their motivational system is the controlling factor. |
|
|
ID and Evolution are two completely different things. One deals with the creation of life while the other deals with the changes / mutations of of life. It is like comparing apples to chain saws - they're not even close.
Niether Darwin or the Theory of Evolution ever denied the exitance of God. In fact, Charles Darwin was a God fearing man. He viewed evolution as a wonderment of God's work - not as a replacement of God. He felt honored that God had given him the opportunity to witness God's own work. If anyone wants to see evolution in action all they have to do is look at the virus, the bacteria, and the cockroach and see how quickly they biologically adapt to their environments and exposure to chemicals - that's evolution at its finest. I can hardly wait to the reaction of the ID freaks when evidence of life is discovered on Mars. How do you explain God's little side projects? |
|
LOL With those big ears I am not surprised. Have you seen the Vicar of Dibley where the old lady on her death bed tells her closest friend she is the Easter Bunny that has been seen by the village children and asked her friend to carry on after her death. Easter morning 10 people show up dressed as the Easter Bunny |
|
I guess you haven't been following along. The Darwin-as-Christian thing has been pretty thoroughly debunked. But the life on Mars thing would be a cool pitch-fork for the ID gunnysack. As would some major asteroid passing between the Earth and the Moon.(Okay, maybe not so close. We don't want to have to replace all our satellites.) |
|
Didn't see that one. Sounds hilarious. |
|
|
Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Comments: 812
|
Hello, "EADGBE," This is completly OT, but do I get a prize if I am guessing right that your moniker comes from the phrase "Eat A Darn Good Breakfast Every [Day]," the strings on a guitar?? ;-) Many thanks for your excellent posts!! And many Cheers to you and yours! |
|
Joined: May 16, 2008
Comments: 90
ISP Location:
Wickenburg, AZ
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Chinese Proverb |
|
Judged:
1
1
1 I'd sooner home school my children than subject them to that crap. |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 The buzz word concept is "Irreducible Complexity" like the 7 molecule rotor that allows the flagella of microoganisms (like sperm) to move and actually go somewhere. Without all 7 protein molecules together, in the correct positions, the flagella will not work and that cell or microorganism isn't going to go anywhere. The big question for Evolutionists is, "How did all 7 proteins get formed correctly and assembled just so by 'accident'"? ID theorists just say that some intelligence from somewhere else in our universe has something to do with it. Just because creationists have co-opted the ID theory doesn't mean all ID theorists are creationists. And would someone PLEASE show me some actual EMPIRICAL evidence for "evolving" completely new genetic information? Evolutionists claim it occurs, but STILL CANNOT show how or why this may occur. They have lots of stories, but NO REAL EVIDENCE ... and they call Creationists dreamers! That shoe fits Evolutionists, too. |
|
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Adaptation is NOT true evolution. It is merely the expression of genes that already exist to help an organism's survival. Otherwise, how could any organism survive long enough for the millions of years it takes to "adapt"? Re: Life on Mars -- What difference would it make if and IDer, or even God, had created life on Mars or anywhere else in the Universe? Why should Earth be the only place?(Even though some creationists don't believe it). Personally, I think it's more likely than not. It's statistically more likely than Evolution occuring multiple times in multiple places and 'creating' life merely by chance over & over. |
|
You have the sound of a troll, but on the off-chance that you're not, let me observe that is ironic to hear about closed-mindedness from somebody who just dropped in with a "you will bow down to my favorite ancient deity" message. Precious irony, indeed. |
|
|
Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Comments: 1042
|
Judged:
1
1
1 http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB200_1... |
|
Judged:
1 But the problem of irreducible complexity is handled reasonable well by evolutionists, and many proponents of evolution (of which I don't qualify to call myself) are pretty sure it handles it completely. But when you say it "fits evolutionists TOO" (emphasis mine) you're admitting that the "dreamers" label fits creationists. Since I'm in neither camp, I don' have any bias toward one or the other. Lacking that bias, I can easily see that Creationism (by any name) surely does rely on stories with no evidence, as you admitted. And since it is ID/Creationism that we're discussing, let's deal with that before we move into areas of science in which neither of us are trained. Then, after we've handled the topic at hand, maybe the two of us can encourage the evolutionists to jump in with their knowledge or reveal their lack thereof. |
|
|
Judged:
1 Excellent advice. However, I have retained Zeke to sue you for slander. Lumping me with the ID folks! See you in court, sweetheart ;-) |
|
|
Joined: Apr 29, 2008
Comments: 153
Tiny place with a Starbucks
ISP Location:
Amarillo, TX
|
Judged:
1
1
1 How does one non-organic cell just spontaneously become something that is organic, has the attributes of life, and is more than just one cell? It seems extremely unlikely to me. |
|
Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Comments: 812
|
Thanks for the reference. However, not being versed in evolutionary scientific terms, do you know of a "Sci.Am.- level" reference? Secondly, have any IDers responded to this reference? TIA |
|
Joined: Mar 18, 2008
Comments: 812
|
Minor correction: Behe's favorite example of IC is the rotary motor structure (complete with a free-spinning rotor that turns within a stator - just as in an electric motor) that drives the flagellum of the e-coli bacteria (the sperm has an attached, non-free-spinning flagellum). Since you're new to me on this forum (others please bear with me), are you familiar with Dr. Gerald Schroeder's "Latent Library" hypothesis, explained in his book, The Science of God, which proposes that *all* the DNA information/structure needed for *all* subsequent life forms was included in the first one-celled life form. As the environment on earth became amenable to life, each DNA sequence in the library expressed itself and each phylum appeared. Fantastic and preposterous, perhaps, but it is one version of ID that would explain how the eye, for example, developed independently in five different phyla. Check him out at http://www.geraldschroeder.com/sog.html |
|
Oh heck guys and gals. I think God just "poofed" everything into existence just as it is. What's so hard to believe about that? Poofed the earth first. Then the solar system and the sun after the earth. Poofed the waters before the light! Poofed man. Poofed the genetic structure of all those animals and plants before man came along. Got tired along the way and duplicated most life's cell structures, but "poof it" He did! Poof. Poof. Here a there. Everywhere a poof poof! Makes sense to me. Enough so that I think we can pretty well discount the sum total of scientific discovery. Don't cha think?
|
|
What scientific research program? When I see debates about Evolution vs. Creationism I truly see The Dumbing of America is well under way. Evolution has nothing to do with creationism or intelligent design. Creationism has to do with the the creation of life and evolution deals with the changes, mutations, and adaptations of life. They are two completely different things. It's like comparing apples to blow torches. |
|
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 'The War Is Not Over' (from Sep '06) | 6 min | Likearock | 116319 |
| Iran says attacking it would be "madness" | 44 min | Podunk | 701 |
| OMG Look at this! | 2 hr | Sammy | 5 |
| First Resident Wolf Pack Confirmed in Washington | 5 hr | jjh | 1 |
| US removes uranium from Iraq, Saddam's WMDs | Thu | Ronald Ruthe... | 51 |
| DMV Will Issue Colonial Williamsburg-Themed Pla... | Thu | Washington DC | 2 |
| Free Washington Classifieds | Jul 23 | Easy Peddler... | 1 |
Related Topix Forums:
Family,
Science / Technology,
Science,
Evolution Debate,
Biology,
Adolescents and Pre-Teens,
Genetics,
Washington Government

