Gay marriage commission fails to make recommendation

progressive wrote:

<quoted text>
I might ask your wife that.

Thats a nice thing to say about someones wife who has no part in this conversation! You are a real class act! You did grow up in Bennigton and that explains alot.

VermontChristian wrote:

Remember GOD is watching!!!

GOD knows that He does not need to watch, for He remembers that HE made me GAY and that is why Jesus died, because HE made me GAY!!

The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.

Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.

No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.

Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.

No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.

Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:

Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!

Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.

Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

Samuel wrote:

The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

How long have you been in the closet?

Unreal wrote:

<quoted text>
How long have you been in the closet?

All of you homosexuals seem to hate yourselves and the horrible perversion by which you define your lives. It's always your worst insult to project your perversion onto anyone who opposes your political tyranny. Of course, it has already been documented that you can make no logical case for homosexual "marriage."

Brock wrote:

(nothing worth repeating)

It's not meant as an insult WilBea, more like a reality check thrown in your direction. We've told you time and time again that the science in this field is pretty much incontrovertible, men who hold such extreme anti-gay views are more often than not using it as a front to mask their own homosexual arousal. Actually, if anyone should be insulted by your being homosexual, egodystonic or otherwise, should be us, afterall, we put up with more than enough abuse without having to count you among us. Face it, the only one you've managed to fool is yourself....

Sick Hick in a Kansas trailer park wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not meant as an insult WilBea, more like a reality check thrown in your direction. We've told you time and time again that the science in this field is pretty much incontrovertible, men who hold such extreme anti-gay views are more often than not using it as a front to mask their own homosexual arousal. Actually, if anyone should be insulted by your being homosexual, egodystonic or otherwise, should be us, afterall, we put up with more than enough abuse without having to count you among us. Face it, the only one you've managed to fool is yourself....

Yes, Sick Hick, we know that you hate yourself and the horrible perversion that has left you dissipated, despised, and alone. You are not alone, countless other h0mofascist fanatics hate themselves and try to project their perversion onto others. You are so fanatically and hatefully devoted to nonsense that you can't logically defend. Insults are really your only outlet.

Ken wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, Sick Hick, we know that you hate yourself and the horrible perversion that has left you dissipated, despised, and alone. You are not alone, countless other h0mofascist fanatics hate themselves and try to project their perversion onto others. You are so fanatically and hatefully devoted to nonsense that you can't logically defend. Insults are really your only outlet.

Lots of people here hiding in their own closets. It is funny, ya know, we talk about being Christian and loving each other, but somewhere down the road, we have forgotten how to be human.

Wil oops I mean Ken wrote:

(nothing worth repeating)

Flail away WilBea, flail away. or should that be flame away? Anyways, if all you have left at your disposal are childish taunts it's a clear sign that I've got your number once again. If you don't want to admit your own rather obvious homosexual tendencies, you don't have to and in fact most of us would rather you didn't as that is definitely one image we don't want to get stuck with. You can attack me all you want, but the truth is inescapable and the more you protest the more obvious it becomes.

Sick Hick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>
Flail away WilBea, flail away. or should that be flame away? Anyways, if all you have left at your disposal are childish taunts it's a clear sign that I've got your number once again. If you don't want to admit your own rather obvious homosexual tendencies, you don't have to and in fact most of us would rather you didn't as that is definitely one image we don't want to get stuck with. You can attack me all you want, but the truth is inescapable and the more you protest the more obvious it becomes.

Forget it, Sick Hick. You cannot project your homosexuality onto somebody else. You're only revealing your profound self hatred in trying and your complete inability to logically defend your ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage."

John Johnston wrote:

<quoted text>Thats a nice thing to say about someones wife who has no part in this conversation! You are a real class act! You did grow up in Bennigton and that explains alot.

Skidsee and I have a 'repoire'. He won't take offense to it, I assure you.

Yes but his wife might! How do you know that she is a Lesbian, do you two hang out together on the weekends or something?

John Johnston wrote:

Yes but his wife might! How do you know that she is a Lesbian, do you two hang out together on the weekends or something?

How does skidsee even think I'm either a man *or* a lesbian?

Same difference.

Don't you have an orifice to bury your head in?

progressive wrote:

<quoted text>
Skidsee and I have a 'repoire'. He won't take offense to it, I assure you.

You mean "rapport".

I don't always agree with you, but this guy wants you a little too badly, if you know what I mean.

You seem to attract secret admirers here.

Maybe you should open a 1-900 business for them.

The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.

Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.

No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.

Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.

No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.

Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:

Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!

Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.

Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

Elmer Fudd wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean "rapport".
I don't always agree with you, but this guy wants you a little too badly, if you know what I mean.
You seem to attract secret admirers here.
Maybe you should open a 1-900 business for them.

Yes,'rapport'(darn firefox didn't auto correct!); thanks!

I'm not sure what the attraction is; maybe someone who tries to think before they speak is a challenge for them.. lol

Astin wrote:

The ridiculous political charade of homosexual "marriage" remains exposed as the fraud that it is.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron.
Homosexuals are NOT the same as other people. They seldom form longterm exclusive
relationships, often completely obsess on perversion, and have much elevated rates of many diseases and social ills. THIS is the reality.
No homosexual "marriage" is recognized by the US Government. We have a democratically established national definition of marriage as solely between one man and one woman.
No law could ever make even one homosexual relationship into a real marriage. It is of course ludicrous to claim that "equal rights" are involved in trying to disenfranchise others on the legal definition of marriage.
Homosexual "marriage" is a complete FRAUD.
Two unequals will NEVER be equal.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage, and the two are VERY different.
No homosexual relationships is the "equal" of a real marriage.
Marriage is indeed very different from any homosexual relationship:
Here are some MAJOR differences between real marriage and any sort of homosexual relationship, especially regarding any governmental involvement:
Like it or not, marriage and family are the basic building block of American Society.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that allows the contrived oxymoron and only about 1.6% of the US population claims to be "GLBT" anyway, so homosexual "marriage" fails on this one!
Children are the usual and natural result of real marriage. No child will EVER be born as a direct result of a homosexual relationship, so homomarriage fails on this one, too!
Having both a mother and father in the home is one of the best statistical predictors of a child's future success in life. No homosexual relationship can provide this.
Marriage is recognized as moral and necessary by nearly all Americans. Americans overwhelmingly reject homosexual "marriage" and most find homosexual acts to be immoral and damaging.

I'm singling you out because you posted most recently.

Homosexuality is not a 'perversion'.
There are plenty of heterosexual people out there (you'd probably be astounded at the numbers) who have sex in ways you probably fantasize about, but are too uptight to explore.

Most people who are outwardly vocal about their aversion to such 'perversions' are only that way because they don't understand them, are afraid of them, or tend to keep themselves socially confined to the point that they're unaware of cultural matters happening beyond their personal microsphere.

An4l sex happens between *lots* of people; not strictly homosexual men.
And not strictly between a man and a woman.

I doubt you'd actually be shocked at some of the sex acts you claim are 'perversion' if you were watching a heterosexual couple perform them.

I'm sure you watch movies where a heterosexual man and woman kiss. Or hold hands. Or proclaim their love for each other.

Most humans who have the capacity to be emotional and empathetic have those feelings toward other humans. For some, it's the opposite sex. For others, it's not.

What does it matter to you what happens behind closed doors, if it's not in your home? And, would you feel the same if your romantic/sex life were under scrutiny to the point that a law could prevent you from marrying the person you loved? Or made a crime certain things you might do in bed when you're feeling all a flutter?

I'm sure you'd feel a bit oppressed.
Put yourself in someone elses shoes. It doesn't mean putting yourself in their bed. It means: be empathetic to other humans, and understand that simply because you don't like it doesn't mean you get to say it's wrong and then make it so. There are others with thoughts and voices as well, and theirs count just as much.

I love people who quote God and the Bible regarding gay issues - it's all they have to stand behind. Pathetic. It's called treating people with respect and dignity...what a novel concept.

GetALife wrote:

I love people who quote God and the Bible regarding gay issues - it's all they have to stand behind. Pathetic. It's called treating people with respect and dignity...what a novel concept.

That's right,atheism is so fashionable these days.Everyone's into it.If you want to be part of the crowd,be a atheist.Faith is a gift,it needs to be unwrapped.
Ye shall know them by their fruits and you my @#$% are one of them.Get a job.