Bills allowing guns in cars limp forward

zardoz wrote:

<quoted text>"Nobody" got shot in the old west either did they ??

The wild west wasn’t so wild. Gun fights weren’t part of the normal day. That perception comes from Hollywood.

I bet people got stabbed with knives, hit with rocks and fell off horses as well.

There are approximately 254 million cars in the US. More than 300 million guns. Care to guess which one causes more deaths?

Have Seen It Before wrote:

<quoted text>Anger Management is in the same realm as Sensitivity Training. Both should be called Crock Of Shit. The truth upsets some people so badly that the truth teller gets sent to some lame ass limpdick mandated training to show them the error of their ways. Last time I was sent I took the certificate and farted on it in front of the whole class before tossing it in the trashcan on the way out the door.

The truth is closer to many people today don’t want to be responsible for their own actions. Easier to blame a condition rather than self.

Hondo wrote:

Soon we will all be wearing a gun on our hip....just like the old west. Government gone crazy !!!

If it's a gun in our hip, then so be it. There is nothing so Americna than being armed. After all, this is gun country.

zardoz wrote:

<quoted text>"Nobody" got shot in the old west either did they ??

As the other poster said, the wild west was not at all that wild. Sure, all that shoot-em-up makes for an exciting movie, just like the tough guys of today's shows. In no town, county or state did EVERYONE wear a gun all the time, not even cowboys,...but it was nice for rattlesnakes! Why, even Wyatt Earp didn't constantly wear one and neither did Doc Holliday (but he did carry a knife all the time.) But I'm telling you, I "will" pull a gun on Russia, China or Cuba any time..........and I'm not sure about Nobama yet!

JasonStorm wrote:

<quoted text>
After all, this is gun country.

You can tell that from all the murders in the news everyday.

"The right to bear arms shall not be infringed"

ALL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

jackson wrote:

<quoted text>You can tell that from all the murders in the news everyday.

The "gun" don't do the killing. The person who pulls the trigger does. Think of it that way and you may learn something yet.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
The wild west wasn’t so wild. Gun fights weren’t part of the normal day. That perception comes from Hollywood.
I bet people got stabbed with knives, hit with rocks and fell off horses as well.
There are approximately 254 million cars in the US. More than 300 million guns. Care to guess which one causes more deaths?

Funny, I tried to go to the store in a gun but the gun was too small and had no wheels...or an engine.

Anti Booze wrote:

"The right to bear arms shall not be infringed"
ALL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

Funny, there are many criminals on the same side of that sentiment as you. You keep bad company.

eternal cynic wrote:

<quoted text>
So, because there are some violent people in our nation we should punish everyone? That’s logical. Let’s ban automobiles. Angry people have used them as murder weapons. Stupid people kill people with cars every day.
Should we also ban alcohol because some people have anger issues when drunk?
That is what you’re saying.
Anger management is a crock of shit. It’s also a phrase idiots use to an attempt to desperately prove a point.

You are so paranoid. Who the hell is infringing your ability to have an arsenal that would put the military of a small country to shame? Who? Who? Who?

There are millions of guns. Who exactly is taking them away except for the goonies inside your paranoid brain?

No one is banning guns. No one is banning automobiles. No one is banning alcohol.

Pot OTOH is banned by people like you. Gay marriage OTOH is banned by people like you. You are not only paranoid, you people are hypocrites. You want freedom for yourself and slavery for people you do not like.

Typical.

The Rogue wrote:

<quoted text>
The "gun" don't do the killing. The person who pulls the trigger does. Think of it that way and you may learn something yet.

Going along with your utter lack of reasoning, the gun is unnecessary. Pick up a bullet and throw it.

Yep, that has exactly the same effect.

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny, I tried to go to the store in a gun but the gun was too small and had no wheels...or an engine.

That reply is ignorance in the first degree.

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
You are so paranoid. Who the hell is infringing your ability to have an arsenal that would put the military of a small country to shame? Who? Who? Who?
There are millions of guns. Who exactly is taking them away except for the goonies inside your paranoid brain?
No one is banning guns. No one is banning automobiles. No one is banning alcohol.
Pot OTOH is banned by people like you. Gay marriage OTOH is banned by people like you. You are not only paranoid, you people are hypocrites. You want freedom for yourself and slavery for people you do not like.
Typical.

Who would be "you people" ?

ORSux wrote:

<quoted text>
Which is why the words well regulated militia were never used in the 2nd Amendment...oops, wait!
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Have a gun, be part of a well regulated militia. Seems very, very, very clear except to those who want guns but are too lazy to attend the militia meetings.

There is a comma between the "militia" part and the "people" part; a coma use used for "and" or "or" thus it is TWO separate rights.

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
You are so paranoid. Who the hell is infringing your ability to have an arsenal that would put the military of a small country to shame? Who? Who? Who?
There are millions of guns. Who exactly is taking them away except for the goonies inside your paranoid brain?
No one is banning guns. No one is banning automobiles. No one is banning alcohol.
Pot OTOH is banned by people like you. Gay marriage OTOH is banned by people like you. You are not only paranoid, you people are hypocrites. You want freedom for yourself and slavery for people you do not like.
Typical.

Gays can NOT "marry" since they can't reproduce. Gun laws are unconstitutional and requiring a permit is unconstitutional

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny, there are many criminals on the same side of that sentiment as you. You keep bad company.

Criminals like gun bans. They like their victims unarmed. Since they are criminals the gun ban don't apply to them. Look at New York, almost impossible to own a gun legally yet the criminals have no problem with getting them and using them against the sheep. You have been proven a liar over and over again, you have no credibility here. You are simply making a fool of yourself.

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
Going along with your utter lack of reasoning, the gun is unnecessary. Pick up a bullet and throw it.
Yep, that has exactly the same effect.

Humans have been killing each other for thousands of years before guns. You continue to lie and make a fool out of yourself.

OregonSUX wrote:

<quoted text>
You are so paranoid. Who the hell is infringing your ability to have an arsenal that would put the military of a small country to shame? Who? Who? Who?
There are millions of guns. Who exactly is taking them away except for the goonies inside your paranoid brain?
No one is banning guns. No one is banning automobiles. No one is banning alcohol.
Pot OTOH is banned by people like you. Gay marriage OTOH is banned by people like you. You are not only paranoid, you people are hypocrites. You want freedom for yourself and slavery for people you do not like.
Typical.

More assumptions on your part. I’m all for the legalization of pot. In fact, I would legalize all drugs. Prohibition doesn’t work, that was clearly illustrated by the prohibition of alcohol. Did you know that’s what gave rise to organized crime in the US?

Gay marriage? I’m good with that as well. Why would I care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home. I do take issue with things like gay parades. Imagine if someone organized a straight parade. They of course would be called homophobes.

I never said they’re banning guns. Are you capable of understanding plain English?

Seems every time there’s a high profile incident where some idiot used a firearm in a criminal manner idiots come out demanding more gun laws. Aren’t more than 20,000 gun laws enough?

You’re a typical liberal liar. Assumption and the creation of bullshit as you go.

Southern Baptist wrote:

<quoted text>
Gays can NOT "marry" since they can't reproduce. Gun laws are unconstitutional and requiring a permit is unconstitutional

Actually why is that a prerequisite? I believe we have enough people in this world now.

What two consenting adults do in the privacy of their home is none of your business, or mine. I feel they should be allowed to marry and enjoy all the “benefits” of it. Alimony and divorce come to mind.

Intent wrote:

<quoted text> Criminals like gun bans. They like their victims unarmed. Since they are criminals the gun ban don't apply to them. Look at New York, almost impossible to own a gun legally yet the criminals have no problem with getting them and using them against the sheep. You have been proven a liar over and over again, you have no credibility here. You are simply making a fool of yourself.

New York is 2 seperate and unequal states. In Upstate which is everything except NYC & Long Island it's fairly easy to own a rifle or shotgun but handguns are a problem. In NYC ALL guns are a problem to get. Pistol Permits are "May Issue" which leaves it up to the issuing judge. Some judges are inclined to issue "full carry" permits which are good to carry everywhere except NYC while others issue restricted permits for hunting & target shooting. Some judges are not inclined at all to issue so County of residence makes a difference. The permit process can take up to TWO years to complete to even OWN a handgun much less carry it...