Repeal could force action

appleandorange wrote:

<quoted text>
Absolutely, I would rather not deal with alot of issues, but they are here right now and I've learned ignoring them only makes things worse.

Exactly. Couldn't have said it better. That's why I'm here.

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly. Couldn't have said it better. That's why I'm here.

So, this comes down to each persons beliefs and expectations.

I agree to disagree.

appleandorange wrote:

<quoted text>
So, this comes down to each persons beliefs and expectations.
I agree to disagree.

Fair enough.

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
Anyway. Shoo fly.
Get back to me when ya find the sac to answer the question.

If you only had a couple then perhaps you would address what I already posted. So far you've misread my posts (purposely) and accused me of twisting your words. To date you have not addressed what I wrote so as far as I'm concerned you never had any balls.

Do trolls have balls?

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
Could care less about other countries. I care about this one. And gay marriage is only legal in two states, Tex, not "several" (soon to be only one state come November).
Quit dodgin' this here question!

I didn't dodge the question. You simply didn't like my answer. Comparing homosexuality to incest is downright silly. You are comparing apples to oranges.

devons wrote:

<quoted text>
If you only had a couple then perhaps you would address what I already posted. So far you've misread my posts (purposely) and accused me of twisting your words. To date you have not addressed what I wrote so as far as I'm concerned you never had any balls.
Do trolls have balls?

Again, using my material. C'mon devons, that's not fair, get your own!

Anyway. Shoo fly.

Get back to me when ya find the sac to answer the question.

Patrick in Texas wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't dodge the question. You simply didn't like my answer. Comparing homosexuality to incest is downright silly. You are comparing apples to oranges.

"Side-step, side-step, now swing your partner, dos-e-doe, now side-step, side-step..."

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
"Side-step, side-step, now swing your partner, dos-e-doe, now side-step, side-step..."

I see you're still trying to compare homosexuality with incest.

60 years ago California passed legislation allowing for interracial marriage. Back then, opponents of interracial marriage lamented that incest and polygamy would be next. That was 60 years ago and it never happened.

The slippery slope argument is so old and tired. Don't you have anything better?

Patrick in Texas wrote:

<quoted text>
I see you're still trying to compare homosexuality with incest.
60 years ago California passed legislation allowing for interracial marriage. Back then, opponents of interracial marriage lamented that incest and polygamy would be next. That was 60 years ago and it never happened.
The slippery slope argument is so old and tired. Don't you have anything better?

It's not a slippery slope argument for me, only for you.

"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

I thought all people were created or evolved equal. If people would just mind thier own business this would be a non issue. Also if people put as much effort into helping people as tghey do judging people the whole country/world would benifit and less people would get hurt. Puting people down because you do not agree with them hurts you and them.

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not a slippery slope argument for me, only for you.
"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

Then why hasn't it happened yet? It was 60 years ago that people just like you warned of incest becoming legal after legalizing interracial marriage.

It is indeed the old slippery slope argument. You can scream all you want that legalizing same sex marriage will lead to incest, but history shows you to be wrong. Sorry!

Patrick in Texas wrote:

<quoted text>
Then why hasn't it happened yet? It was 60 years ago that people just like you warned of incest becoming legal after legalizing interracial marriage.
It is indeed the old slippery slope argument. You can scream all you want that legalizing same sex marriage will lead to incest, but history shows you to be wrong. Sorry!

"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

You didn't answer my question.

"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

Live and let live!
How can two people getting married hurt anyone?

Patrick in Texas wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't answer my question.
"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

I'll answer yours when you answer mine. I asked my question first, Tex.

Now, yes or no?

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, using my material. C'mon devons, that's not fair, get your own!
Anyway. Shoo fly.
Get back to me when ya find the sac to answer the question.

It's been answered by not only me. You just don't like the answer. Now you have to resort to only posting "anwer the question" over and over again. I guess you feel people with mistake you as someone that asked some question no person can answer.....LOL. More very old silly troll tactics.

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not a slippery slope argument for me, only for you.

ROFLMAO

Silly troll.

bridog wrote:

<quoted text>
I'll answer yours when you answer mine. I asked my question first, Tex.
Now, yes or no?

I already answered your question. Go back and read my responce since it seems you never did read it. Now where is the answer to my question?

"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

We are still debating this issue? Well, I think what ever people do is there business not the government.

Patrick in Texas wrote:

<quoted text>
I already answered your question. Go back and read my responce since it seems you never did read it. Now where is the answer to my question?
"...now swing partner, dos-e-doe, dodge the question, and 'round he goes! now side-step, side-step..."

TEX: "The old slippery slope routine is so old and tired. Gay marriage has been legal for a while now in several countries around the world. I don't see pedophiles, bestiality lovers or incestous couples fighting for the right to marry in those countries. I bet the slippery slope routine was also used to try and prevent interracial marriage in America."

This is your answer to my question (See Post #168). This is not an answer. Not even close. A simple "yes" or "no" will do, and then we can discuss it further if you like, or I'll answer your question about the inter-racial marriage argument sixty years ago. Fair enough?