Md. to revoke more than 150 driver's licenses in fraud case

Why is the A-ACLU always supporting illegals?
Clearly our homeland security means NOTHING
to this communist-based anti-American Criminal
Libility Union.

ACLU Sux wrote:

Why is the A-ACLU always supporting illegals?
Clearly our homeland security means NOTHING
to this communist-based anti-American Criminal
Libility Union.

They aren't "always supporting illegals."
It does.
Roger Baldwin purged the ACLU of all communists back in the late 40's.

Get some education. You need it.

"We just want to make sure there was no profiling and this was done free of any type of bias," said Sebastian G. Amar, a CASA staff attorney.

Sounds reasonable.

"Questions about licenses issued by a former employee arose as part of a federal investigation, and the MVA notified scores of individuals around the beginning of June that their licenses or identification cards had been canceled."

So, if it all revolves around a certain former employee and what he/she did, then there would be no profiling at all. Simply going over the records of this former employee.

Of course, if the State of Maryland didn't start giving drivers licenses to people who could not prove citizenship and residency, that is their stupidity. I wasn't even aware that they were doing this until recently. I would like to know whose decision it was in the first place.

We should be giving the illegals nothing but a one way ticket back to home of origin. Adios.

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
They aren't "always supporting illegals."
It does.
Roger Baldwin purged the ACLU of all communists back in the late 40's.
Get some education. You need it.

It's Flabioso, the wanna be lawyer. Your La Raza is showing again!

Look E Here wrote:

<quoted text>It's Flabioso, the wanna be lawyer. Your La Raza is showing again!

I'm white.

Silly person.

And the justice is just beginning!

yes we need to let all the mexicans and an yone else that wants to come to usa free everything WE CAN AFFORD IT WE A RICH COUNTRY WAFJ

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm white.
Silly person.

There are alot of "white" LaRaza supporters. What's your point.

real american worker wrote:

yes we need to let all the mexicans and an yone else that wants to come to usa free everything WE CAN AFFORD IT WE A RICH COUNTRY WAFJ

Why dont you change your name to Clueless worker, fits much better

shine4me wrote:

<quoted text>
There are alot of "white" LaRaza supporters. What's your point.

My point is that I'm not among them. You just went right ahead and made a false assumption that I was.

Not very smart of you.

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
My point is that I'm not among them. You just went right ahead and made a false assumption that I was.
Not very smart of you.

"False assumption" - how so?

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
My point is that I'm not among them. You just went right ahead and made a false assumption that I was.
Not very smart of you.

I'm not trying to start an argument with you. When another poster stated, "your La Raza is showing again", you did not repute that - you simply stated, "I'm White".

My understanding from that is simple and obvious. Either "your La Raza" isn't "showing again" because you're "White"; or, you're "White" and therefore you can't be "showing your La Raza again". Either way, saying "I'm White" does not say "I'm not a 'La Raza'. Therefore I'm not assuming anything. I'm simply stating that being "White" doesn't mean that you aren't a "La Raza" because there are those with "La Raza" beliefs that are "White".

shine4me wrote:

<quoted text>
"False assumption" - how so?

Assuming that I am a supporter of La Raza, when I am actually a critic.

shine4me wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not trying to start an argument with you. When another poster stated, "your La Raza is showing again", you did not repute that - you simply stated, "I'm White".
My understanding from that is simple and obvious. Either "your La Raza" isn't "showing again" because you're "White"; or, you're "White" and therefore you can't be "showing your La Raza again". Either way, saying "I'm White" does not say "I'm not a 'La Raza'. Therefore I'm not assuming anything. I'm simply stating that being "White" doesn't mean that you aren't a "La Raza" because there are those with "La Raza" beliefs that are "White".

Well hopefully it's clarified by now.

I think La Raza sucks.

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
Assuming that I am a supporter of La Raza, when I am actually a critic.

[sigh]- Excellent;)

Fabioso wrote:

<quoted text>
Well hopefully it's clarified by now.
I think La Raza sucks.

It's all good:)

real american worker wrote:

yes we need to let all the mexicans and an yone else that wants to come to usa free everything WE CAN AFFORD IT WE A RICH COUNTRY WAFJ

Question: WAFJ - does that stand for, "what a f^^king jerk"? Mind if I use that?

shine4me wrote:

<quoted text>
[sigh]- Excellent;)

In fact, I consider them a racist organization and counterproductive to the goal of ensuring equal rights for Latino citizens.

Sort of how PETA is counterproductive to animal welfare.