What Is Your Stance on Gay Marriage?

woodtick57 wrote:

<quoted text>Why wouldn't I qualify? The state lackey that did my marriage said my wife and I qualified.

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Queer Dude, get your fat Queer A$$ back on the couch where Queer Atlas can pack your shi+ again then you can su;ck him clean. Saves on wash cloths. LMFAO

Judged:

1

1

1

Biblical fundamentalist wrote:

<quoted text>
how does that definition prohibit your rights at all. It doesn't limit you right to work, speak, vote, live together, or any other way.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
Someone recently said:
"marriage is the purview of the state. Always has been. Always will be."
Hey, it was you. Most states say you don't qualify.

Judged:

1

1

1

EASY MONEY wrote:

Gay what? OH! Just where did this word gay come from? Their misfits and for sure not gay and not normal.

Judged:

1

1

1

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
And that's why there there are legal battles at the state level. The state can't make arbitrary and harmful laws and expect them to go unchallenged.

Judged:

1

1

1

Buffalo Bill wrote:

I don't care what you call it love is in the heart not in the title....

Judged:

1

1

1

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
You can love anyone you want to, be as committed as you can be, marriage is not required.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
You can love anyone you want to, be as committed as you can be, marriage is not required.

Judged:

1

1

1

no big O wrote:

<quoted text>
To get legal rights of married people it is.....

Judged:

1

1

1

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
1. Sorry, but it always amazes me that people have your attitude living in a State that allows Same-Sex Couples to marry and that this has been a reality for the last 8 years.......in fact EVERY MARRIAGE LICENSE ISSUED IN MASSACHUSETTS LOOKS THE SAME FOR BOTH SAME-SEX AND OPPOSITE-SEX, right?
2. You're right........people can love who ever they want and marriage is not a requirement......it's also not a requirement to procreate in order to get married.......so, you really have no point, do ya?
3. In fact.....you have been posting on Topix for over 4 years saying the same garbage and in reality.....you haven't done anything truly about it, right?
4. In fact, you have stated that you don't really have a problem with Gays or Lesbians getting married, just as long as they keep everything about Homosexuality out of the schools that you don't have kids going to anyways, right?

Judged:

1

1

1

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
1. Don't blame the people of Massachusetts for gay marriage, we had no say in it. Marriage licenses looked different when I got married, they changed them to accommodate gays.

Judged:

1

1

1

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, the horror! Let's hope civilization doesn't crumble because an application says "Party one/Party two" instead of "Husband/wife" or whatever.

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
That has nothing to do with love and commitment. Do you people ever say what you mean?

Judged:

1

1

1

no big O wrote:

<quoted text>
I say what I mean and mean what I say... Your comment was that you did not need marriage for love and commitment. I said no

Wondering wrote:

<quoted text>
1. Don't blame the people of Massachusetts for gay marriage, we had no say in it. Marriage licenses looked different when I got married, they changed them to accommodate gays. The answer to your question is no. My marriage license was issued in Massachusetts and it does not look the same as what is being issued today.
2. Not one that you would understand or agree with.
3. Actually, I have. In fact, just posting here and telling people about things like David Parker and Alemeda Lesson 9 are doing something about it. I have been thanked by people for posting links to this information.
4. Before gay marriage came to the state it was believed it would come to a ballot, it didn't. I wouldn't have voted one way or the other. Today I would.

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Queer Dude, do you enjoy eating & swallowing Semen & Feces ????