Gun Bill Signed; Abortion Bill Vetoed

Well, that 1 for 2. It's well for gun collectors and Second Amendment supporters. However, the governor's blindness due to her pro-abortion agenda, of the real health hazards to women, will continue to allow them to be exploited, expecially the minors. Hopefully, there are enough votes to override the veto.

Rick: Let's let the women decide on this...too many men are running the anti-abortion movement and cabal...it's time the women decide...for OR against. When you can conceive and give birth...them perhaps you could have a voice. PERSONAL OPINION...but permissible.

What a lousy misandrist.

KSSENIOR wrote:

Rick: Let's let the women decide on this...too many men are running the anti-abortion movement and cabal...it's time the women decide...for OR against. When you can conceive and give birth...them perhaps you could have a voice. PERSONAL OPINION...but permissible.

My personal opinion was formed partly by the women I know and my 9 years experience in a medical center. Are you familiar with the problems abortion cause for women? You can google it and get back to me. Que pase un buena noche!

To KSSENIOR,
You wrote:

"Rick: Let's let the women decide on this...too many men are running the anti-abortion movement and cabal...it's time the women decide...for OR against. When you can conceive and give birth...them perhaps you could have a voice. PERSONAL OPINION...but permissible."

So KS senior, should women never be allowed to vote on anything normally dominated by men.
What about war? And don't write back and tell me women are in Iraq fighting.

Why aren't men qualified to vote on abortion legislation? I would imagine half those babies being exterminated are males.

Perhaps you would like all abortion providers to be females.

I know more women who are opposed to abortion then those who believe it to be OK!

Hey KSSENIOR, if abortion is something that is acceptable, then do me a favor and lobby the networks to televise three or four live abortions one evening.
You won't do that, will you? No, of course not.
It is a pretty gruesome procedure, and it would make many people sick to see what is done to a live baby.

Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
Burned with saline solution. ALIVE. Sounds a little like Auschwits or Dachau.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE.

No, this isn't a matter for just women to vote on.

I would love to see how all you feminists would react if any male suggested we shouldn't let females vote on some issues.

Boy, Katie bar the door.
NAG!! The National Association of Gals would go crazy.

Is that you Phil Kline?

Rick op wrote:

Well, that 1 for 2. It's well for gun collectors and Second Amendment supporters. However, the governor's blindness due to her pro-abortion agenda, of the real health hazards to women, will continue to allow them to be exploited, expecially the minors. Hopefully, there are enough votes to override the veto.

Tom D wrote:

It is a pretty gruesome procedure, and it would make many people sick to see what is done to a live baby.
Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE.
No, this isn't a matter for just women to vote on.
I would love to see how all you feminists would react if any male suggested we shouldn't let females vote on some issues.

Again, there was a federal ban on partial birth abortions enacted in 2003 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2007.

You can't make these people understand.

concerned mom wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, there was a federal ban on partial birth abortions enacted in 2003 and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2007.

[QUOTE who="Tom D
It is a pretty gruesome procedure, and it would make many people sick to see what is done to a live baby.
Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
Burned with saline solution. ALIVE. Sounds a little like Auschwits or Dachau.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE.
No, this isn't a matter for just women to vote on.
I would love to see how all you feminists would react if any male suggested we shouldn't let females vote on some issues.
[/QUOTE]
Why do you keep referring to this procedure when there is already a federal law banning it?

Me thinks someone doth protest a wee bit too much?(Tom D.) What woman kicked your butt? I'll say this..the anti press has done it's job. According to your comments ....no child or woman has survived without the wisdom and protection of we men...yeah.. I am a male.

And while I'm at it: Concerned Mom states in part:
"Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
Burned with saline solution. ALIVE. Sounds a little like Auschwits or Dachau.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE."

WOW... a bit of sensational anti-abortion back talk for use against the concept. If your going to protest...use something aside from an "emotional" appeal ... I've heard those same words quote so many times that either: someone has really succeeded in brain washing or, there really is a genetic predisposition to posit canned chatter.

Kssenior wrote:

Me thinks someone doth protest a wee bit too much?(Tom D.) What woman kicked your butt? I'll say this..the anti press has done it's job. According to your comments ....no child or woman has survived without the wisdom and protection of we men...yeah.. I am a male.
And while I'm at it: Concerned Mom states in part:
"Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
Burned with saline solution. ALIVE. Sounds a little like Auschwits or Dachau.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE."
WOW... a bit of sensational anti-abortion back talk for use against the concept. If your going to protest...use something aside from an "emotional" appeal ... I've heard those same words quote so many times that either: someone has really succeeded in brain washing or, there really is a genetic predisposition to posit canned chatter.

...And your point?

Hey KSSENIOR:
What ever makes you think some woman kicked my butt? I doth protest too much?

I disagree, I don't think enough protesting has been done, because the killing of babies is still taking place.

I know your name implies you are a Kansas Senior, but I have to ask, is that senior - as in old fart.
Or is that senior - as in the 12th grade.

Either way, you are slightly lame.

You just criticized someone in your own camp - you dweeb.

You wrote:
And while I'm at it: Concerned Mom states in part:
"Torn apart - limb by limb. And then have their little skulls crushed in order to evacuate the head from the woumb.
Burned with saline solution. ALIVE. Sounds a little like Auschwits or Dachau.
And yeah, I almost forgot, that little necessary procedure called partial birth abortion, where the entire baby is delivered except for the head, into which a spike is driven ending it's LIFE."

Are you that much of an idiot to not realize, "Concerned Mom," didn't state that which you cut and pasted.
She quoted me, you dim-wit.

Then you wrote:
"WOW... a bit of sensational anti-abortion back talk for use against the concept. If your going to protest...use something aside from an "emotional" appeal ... I've heard those same words quote so many times that either: someone has really succeeded in brain washing or, there really is a genetic predisposition to posit canned chatter."

You want protesting the killing of an infant child to be free of emotional appeal?

Earth to KSSENIOR, Earth to KSSENIOR:

Objecting to murdering an infant in the woumb, is not canned speech nor is it brain washing, you dunce.

Have you grown so cold hearted that seeing, or even knowing, that a baby is laying in the abortuary lifeless, does not effect what few emotions you may have left.

Sorry, but you do not get your wish.

Perhaps, when you kick, there will be no tears shed for your cold-hearted useless butt. Perhaps no emotion shown by anyone attending your funeral.
Would that be fitting, since you don't like emotion?

I despise people like you. If you died it would be good for society, or at least good for the unborn. I pray God would send upon you nightmares of lifeless babies surrounding you asking you WHY?
WHY DO YOU KILL US? WHAT DID WE DO TO DESERVE THIS? PLEASE, LET US LIVE.

To all,

Yes, there is a federal ban on partial birth abortions, but don't kid yourself - it is still performed.

You say that abortins do not occur after the second trimester - Uh! wrong again. "Tiller the killer," has been doing late term abortions without any fear of getting busted.

So I will continue to say that which you do not wish to hear. TOO BAD

If you're against something...use reason, logic and facts...not canned remarks. Please let us live? Don't kill us....that's a really logical argument. It's called Argumentum ad Hominem and it means.. you can't marshal reasonable and documentably and logical facts against someone's stand.. so you go to the pity place. SHAME.

Kssenior wrote:

If you're against something...use reason, logic and facts...not canned remarks. Please let us live? Don't kill us....that's a really logical argument. It's called Argumentum ad Hominem and it means.. you can't marshal reasonable and documentably and logical facts against someone's stand.. so you go to the pity place. SHAME.

It might help if we knew to which post you are responding.

Tom D wrote:

To all,
Yes, there is a federal ban on partial birth abortions, but don't kid yourself - it is still performed.
You say that abortins do not occur after the second trimester - Uh! wrong again. "Tiller the killer," has been doing late term abortions without any fear of getting busted.
So I will continue to say that which you do not wish to hear. TOO BAD

I don't see any posts here advocating for late term or partial-birth abortions.

To dim-wit,

If you are referring to me, when you suggested canned remarks should not be used, I have no idea to what you are referring.

Pretty much whatever is said in favor of offing little babies by the pro-abortion side is also canned remarks.

So what is your point.

You can't talk about this issue without it being emotional. And I have no idea what remarks are canned, according to you.

Tell you what; Why don't you let me know what I can't say, or even better, what I can say.

You must know all the canned remarks - so do me a slight favor and just list about 10 to 15 of the most used canned remarks, so I don't violate your sensibilities.

How do I communicate with you to let you know I think you are a lousy human being.
And I feel that way, because anyone who would sanction, support, promote, and favor killing unborn children through abortion is absolutley no better then people like Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, or any other mass murderer.

STOP KILLING THE BABIES!!!!!!!!!!

Was that canned? or insensitive on my part? I wouldn't want to impart emotion into this debate.

You and people like you are ruinning my country.
I meant what I said before, you are a dim-witted dunce.
You must be lacking in some cognitive functions.

You wrote:
"you can't marshal reasonable and documentably and logical facts against someone's stand.. so you go to the pity place. SHAME."

Over and over again people have offered logical, documented, and reasonable facts against your position, but you do not accept them.

Sorry, you are not allowed to silence those who would oppose you, you can not impose your assinine rules by dismissing anything said on the pro-life side as unreasonable, undocumented, and illogical. SHAME, SHAME, SHAME ON YOU.

Who the f*ck cares what any male has to say about the issue of abortion at all? Get off it, you pricks. If you can't get pregnant, shut the hell up and stay out of it. You don't have a say.

Dewhickey wrote:

Who the f*ck cares what any male has to say about the issue of abortion at all? Get off it, you pricks. If you can't get pregnant, shut the hell up and stay out of it. You don't have a say.

My, a potty mouth and a name caller!!

Rick op wrote:

<quoted text>
My, a potty mouth and a name caller!!

Cry me a river, Dick op.