Kan. abortion rules face test in federal court

nunya wrote:

I disagree with war yet my taxes go to support war. Isn't war kind of like performing really, really late term abortions by the thousands? Why can anyone who claims to be pro life support war? Perplexing indeed.

Judged:

2

2

1

Grrrrrrrrrr wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a traversty and a disgrace what people do in lieu of birth conrtol 53 million abortions/CHOICES has nothing to do with health rights of anyone but dead babies
dispicable
KUDOS Kansas!

Judged:

2

2

1

californio wrote:

<quoted text>And you have ever right to protest against war, lobby your congressman against War and try to get war stopped.

Judged:

2

2

2

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

BREAKING NEWS:
A federal judge has blocked Kansas from enforcing new rules for its abortion providers.
Wow, another great court decision to go into the 4th of July weekend celebrating our Independence from the right-wingers attempts to end this great country as the Founding Fathers meant for it to be.

Judged:

2

2

nunya wrote:

I disagree with war yet my taxes go to support war. Isn't war kind of like performing really, really late term abortions by the thousands? Why can anyone who claims to be pro life support war? Perplexing indeed.

Judged:

4

4

4

demoncraps wrote:

funny how liberetards stick up for the murder of God's little children ... democraps make me sick!

SIR LANCELOT wrote:

<quoted text>As i have said many times before liberals are evil. They proclaim how cultured and caring they are, but if you notice it is the scum and evil they stand up for while abusing the most innocent.

Judged:

1

1

nunya wrote:

<quoted text>
What? Are you upset at the lot lizards who refuse to be the mother of your children? All she wanted was some money to buy some more meth. It's probably best that she ended you child's life before it began. She wouldn't have been a good mommy and you are always on the road hauling Chinese products to the American masses. That's why your wife keeps going to planned parenthood. Not to "protest" like she says, but to keep you from seeing the color of the dark skinned men she sleeps with when you drive off for another week of over the road trucking. If abortions were illegal, you would be able to catch that cheating #@$% once and for all. lol

Judged:

2

2

2

Marine Corp Pat wrote:

BREAKING NEWS:
A federal judge has blocked Kansas from enforcing new rules for its abortion providers.
Wow, another great court decision to go into the 4th of July weekend celebrating our Independence from the right-wingers attempts to end this great country as the Founding Fathers meant for it to be.

Judged:

1

1

nunya wrote:

<quoted text>
That doesn't mean I have the right to bomb warrior's workplaces or go into churches and murder off duty warriors. Face it, the supporters of pro choice are far less radical than the pro life crowd who bomb clinics and murder doctors just because they didn't get their way in the courts. The courts have decided that not even the government can force a woman to carry a child from conception to birth if she doesn't want to. That would be like caging up an animal and forcing them to breed. Try to remember that involuntary servitude was prohibited by constitutional amendment.

Judged:

1

1

1

californio wrote:

<quoted text>
Your reply has nothing to do with anything I posted. Trying to change the subject?
I will state my position again. If I am not paying for it I have no say in what a woman does. But if said woman going to hand me the bill ,then I have the right to stick my nose i her business.
So if you are paying for your own abortion it is none of my business, but the moment you hand me the bill(Use my tax dollars to fund it) IT IS MY BUSINESS.

Judged:

1

ProLife wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a hero to defend the unborn...abortions induce mental health risks, breast cancer, and many other serious problems that actually HINDER the health of women. Worst of all, abortions kill.

Judged:

1

pamiety wrote:

<quoted text>
Something you might be interested in:
http://www.usatoday.com/yourlife/health/medic...
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/01/13...
More women suffer from mental health issues who give birth then the terminate the pregnancy for what ever the reason.
It's the woman/couple decision.

pamiety wrote:

<quoted text>
Where are you being handed the bill? I guess you are not familiar with the Hyde Amendment which has been in affect since 1976. No federal money for abortions. So you have nothing to worry about because your tax money is not being used for abortions.

Judged:

1

1

1

ProLife wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for the links, but I never made a claim that woman suffer health risks more so if the have an abortion than if they actually gie brith. What you say is totally true, but I want you to think about this: what is better...two lives, one fine and the other one "challenged," or only one life, seriously scarred by the knowledge that her child was killed...within her own womb.

californio wrote:

<quoted text> I live in California where State money is used.

Judged:

3

2

2

nunya wrote:

If someone wants to go to the doctor it is their business, not your. What the doctor says to the patient is none of your business. What the patient says to the doctor is none of your business. Any diagnosis given is none of your business. Any treatment prescribed is none of your business. The laws of this land prohibit the release of medical information to third parties so if lab results indicate someone is pregnant, it is none of your business and you have no right to know. Only the doctor and the patient. If the pregnancy is terminated through abortion or miscarriage, it was none of your business in the first place so quit trying to make it so.