Jeb Bush says no to being Romney's vice president

At least there's one Bush with a brain.

That's sad. We have a W, but we don't have the Bush name.

:(

W 2012!

Jeb Bush isn't as severely conservative as Bishop Rmoney. WTF? Is the RNC looking for commies to run???

How about a Tea Party candidate for VP? How about Donald Trump?

Why isn't Rmoney for Trump?????

Makes sense wrote:

Jeb Bush isn't as severely conservative as Bishop Rmoney. WTF? Is the RNC looking for commies to run???
How about a Tea Party candidate for VP? How about Donald Trump?
Why isn't Rmoney for Trump?????

IF the RNC was looking for a COMMIE to run things than it need not look any further than who is OCCUPYING the white house presently.

Good. He was a good governor in my home state of Fl but I don't want to see anymore Clinton's, Bush's or Blobama's.

The laughing liberal wrote:

Good. He was a good governor in my home state of Fl but I don't want to see anymore Clinton's, Bush's or Blobama's.

Well that leaves little Ronnie Reagan. Since the RNC is looking for commies to be VP.

Why do you liberal A-holes hate Donald Trump or a Tea Party VP? Is it because Bishop Rmoney is already seen as too severely conservative?

The laughing liberal wrote:

Good. He was a good governor in my home state of Fl but I don't want to see anymore Clinton's, Bush's or Blobama's.

Really? What did he do besides install his brother as president?

Did he do anything conservative?

Makes sense wrote:

<quoted text>
Well that leaves little Ronnie Reagan. Since the RNC is looking for commies to be VP.

Commies and twinkle-toe fairies belong to the Dems. Little RR should fit in perfectly.

Jeb Bush is not the answer or the magic fairy dust to help stiffy, shifty, characterless RMoney.

But who is?! LOLL

Maybe Jeb doesn't want to be stained a loser by attaching himself to the Romney ticket. In four years he'll run for the top of the ticket, his family's ego will madate he do so.

Makes sense wrote:

Jeb Bush isn't as severely conservative as Bishop Rmoney. WTF? Is the RNC looking for commies to run???
How about a Tea Party candidate for VP? How about Donald Trump?
Why isn't Rmoney for Trump?????

We already have that.......

Obama’s Third-Party History
New documents shed new light on his ties to a leftist party in the 1990s.
On the evening of January

11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final years of his run as the head of Bain Capital, Barack Obama formally joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate Obama deceived the American public about his potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh as today’s headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the United States toward European-style social democracy, which was precisely the New Party’s goal.

In late October 2008, when I wrote here at NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE that Obama had been a member of the New Party, his campaign sharply denied it, calling my claim a “crackpot smear.” Fight the Smears, an official Obama-campaign website, staunchly maintained that “Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party.” I rebutted this, but the debate was never taken up by the mainstream press.

Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:

Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.

Gunnery Sgt Hartman wrote:

<quoted text>Commies and twinkle-toe fairies belong to the Dems. Little RR should fit in perfectly.

You are so right. He father belongs there too. Talk about COMMIES! That guy sucked big time!

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>We already have that.......

So why do we want more??? Why aren't any Tea Party candidates being considered for VP? Is is because Bishop Rmoney is already viewed as too severely conservative for America?

How about Scott Walker for VP?

Is he 35 yet? Too liberal? Too inexperienced? He did such a nice job with the commies in Wisconsin.

Sarah Palin?

There are so many choices, but I just keep hearing about liberals being considered.

Until the populist victory of Andrew Jackson, the Founding Fathers, who did not necessarily agree on all matters, were almost guaranteed the Presidency. The line of succession was Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe. Adams' son, John Quincy was defeated in his bid for a second term by Jackson who was the antithesis of the intellectuals of the Enlightenment. Although the War of 1812 was officially over, he was famous for his victory at New Orleans where he utilized volunteers of all stripes as well as regular troops. Political operatives accused him of bigamy because he had mistakenly married before his wife's divorce was final. His response to personal insults was to challenge the peep to a duel.

By the time Jackson was elected, the frontier had moved westward and from among the settlers, only the strong survived. Jackson was their hero. John Quincy Adams was viewed by the new breed of rugged individualists as a dynastic figure, exemplifying the type of royal succession most Americans abhorred. This is not to say that Jackson's presidency was not flawed. What we are seeing with the Bush family also smacks of a sense of hereditary privilege. It appeared to many people that the Kennedy clan was pursuing the same path, although unsuccessfully.

Despite his qualifications, Jeb Bush would probably do more harm than good as a VP candidate. My son, who is 31, told me that with the exception of Obama, the only presidents he remembers were named either Bush or. Clinton. Is there no one else in the Republican Party but Bush'? Back to the drawing board.

Good! In Fact, Great! Let the Bushes,(all of them) fade away in shame for what they have done to this country! BTW, I am a former Republican! I have high hopes for Romney and his business acumen. Just so you know I'm not a supporter of the Kenyan.
Regards, Terri

TerryE wrote:

Good! In Fact, Great! Let the Bushes,(all of them) fade away in shame for what they have done to this country! BTW, I am a former Republican! I have high hopes for Romney and his business acumen. Just so you know I'm not a supporter of the Kenyan.
Regards, Terri

• WIRE: Cruel June for Obama, Dems -- and could get worse...

• Tense exchange as Attorney General Eric Holder gives series of 'I don't know' answers to House Judiciary Committee probing whether he or anybody else in the Justice Department told the White House about so-called 'gunwalking' tactics. FOR SOMEONE IN HIS POSTION NOT REMEMBERING, OR NOT KNOWING ANYTHING…………SHOULDN’T HE RESIGN.