Calif. Supreme Court rejects lawsuit against Calif. marriage amendment

Judged:

1

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
Would the anybody who understood this moronic comparison please raise your hand? Anybody? Anybody?

Judged:

1

1

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
Forget about it, this guy is a master at dodging and double talking any legitimate question asked of him. I've yet to read one single thing of substance from his posts on any thread. I'm starting to think his Indian name would be "Running Joke". I mean no offense to the Native Americans for associating him with you.

Judged:

1

disciplemaker wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, wrong-o, on constitutional issues, the majority cannot decide on the rights of the individual. There are no rights for Queers in the U.S. Constitution.
Long may it wave.
D

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>Right. This coming from the people who constantly lose discussions and scream BIGOT, YOU ARE FULL OF HATE. Blah blah blah.

newanarchy wrote:

I've posted this question all over these boards and still have not had one single person answer it, come on folks, people who are so convinced they are right should be able to answer this with no problem.
How does gay marriage affect your straight marriage? Do I love my wife any less now that gays are allowed to marry in California than I did before they were allowed? Is my marriage any less viable now than it was before? Do I love my children any less because gays can marry?
Come on folks give me some answers without resorting to "religious" reasons which have no argument based on common sense or laws. Tell me how it affects YOUR marriage. Tell me why you are against equal rights for everyone.

Judged:

1

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>These questions have nothing to do with the issue that homosexuality is wrong. How it effects my marriage and all the other red herrings are nothing but a distraction from the main issue. Nice try though.

Judged:

1

1

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>These questions have nothing to do with the issue that homosexuality is wrong. How it effects my marriage and all the other red herrings are nothing but a distraction from the main issue. Nice try though.

Judged:

1

1

Kerdy 1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Correct! It amazes me how these people miss simple points and cant grasp simple concepts and analogies. Amazing!!!!

Judged:

1

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
More bullsh!t and double talk from the running joke, lots of talk be he never really says anything.

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
Avoiding the question, I'm not surprised, it would mean you would actually have to think.

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>These questions have nothing to do with the issue that homosexuality is wrong. How it effects my marriage and all the other red herrings are nothing but a distraction from the main issue. Nice try though.

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
Avoiding the question, I'm not surprised, it would mean you would actually have to think. I don't give a flying fu(k if you think homosexuality is wrong, this country wasn't founded on what you think is right or wrong, I should have known you were just another brain dead bigot, crawl back under your rock loser, because the times they are a changing and people like you will be left behind.

Reasoner wrote:

<quoted text>
FINALLY, an honest answer from a Christian. None of this "protecting the sanctity of marriage" bullshit. If only other Christians would be as honest. Denying someone something because they are different is as bigoted and hateful as you can get, but at least I can respect the honesty.
Learn something from Nephilim, Kerdy. Drop the retarded, nonsensical obfuscating analogies and just admit that you want to deny gay people their human rights because you don't like them and you have the power to do so.
And now Nephilim, we can discuss why you think you have the right to deny someone their rights because you think what they do is wrong. I think indoctrinating little kids with religion is wrong; should I have the right to take that away from you because I disagree with it?

newanarchy wrote:

<quoted text>
Avoiding the question, I'm not surprised, it would mean you would actually have to think. I don't give a flying fu(k if you think homosexuality is wrong, this country wasn't founded on what you think is right or wrong, I should have known you were just another brain dead bigot, crawl back under your rock loser, because the times they are a changing and people like you will be left behind.

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>These questions have nothing to do with the issue that homosexuality is wrong. How it effects my marriage and all the other red herrings are nothing but a distraction from the main issue. Nice try though.

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>What a load of poop. You aren't even worth responding to.

Kerdy 1 wrote:

<quoted text>
You have been answered. It isnt our problem if you dont like the answers. You can try all you like to ignore them, but again, thats your personal problem. Not ours.

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>Is it always necessary to curse and call names when called on your nonsense?

Nephilim wrote:

<quoted text>What a load of poop. You aren't even worth responding to.

Roku Roku Roku wrote:

<quoted text>Although I can agree with you on the Gay marriage issue and that Kerdy's analogies are lacking, the stooping to foul language and insults does not help your argument. Kerdy and some others will always bring up the "what's next?, people marrying animals and animals getting married?" even though the comparison has no validity, that is his view. You are not going to change it by lowering yourself to the point of arguing from the gutter.