BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
75,741 - 75,760 of 175,207 Comments Last updated 18 min ago
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85338
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Terry Buckeye wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe. And maybe if you watched the videos you post, assimilated the information and then put it into your own words, I would give more credence to your posts. Thinking for onesself isn't ALWAYS a bad thing.
Give me one good reason why I should go out of my way to appease someone who is too lazy to click on a url.

I just "assimilated the information" in an above post and you questioned it's credibility.Would you like a source for this statement?

Lord have mercy.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85339
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is the CRIMINAL FRAUD?
#84,506
American Lady wrote:
“Don't be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are IRRELEVANT to Senator Obama's ineligibility to be President.”
"Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President.

Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore,

even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President."

SamSewell of FL 8:29AM April 28, 2011

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/susan-mil...

;-)

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85340
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
It is a fact that the long form birth certificate and Selective Service registration card are clearly forgeries.[ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!!]
That is a crime, IDIOT!
You have already agreed that a crime has been committed.
Sorry, bubster. I said you have certainly shown them to be forgeries (although technically the social security thingy is not a "forgery"), but I have challenged YOU to show how that is a CRIME.{Please provide the Class with any post in which I said there was a CRIME.)
PRESIDENT OBAMA’S CRIMINAL ACT(S)
1. YES or NO? Has the Sheriff of Maricopa County (AZ) determined there is probable cause that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has committed a CRIME?
2. If so, what is the specific criminal statute (federal or state?) that the Sheriff of Maricopa County (AZ) has determined that Obama has violated? Please cite the specific statute.
3. If so, what is the specific criminal act(s) and WHERE (the required nexus) and ON WHAT DATE was the specific criminal act(s) committed?
4. What are the requisite elements to secure a conviction for that CRIME?
5. What is the basis for the Sheriff of Maricopa County’s jurisdiction to investigate a matter related to a federal election?
====
Please cite any CRIMINAL STATUTE (and whether federal or state) and list the requisite elements for any CRIME you think has been committed. Thank you.
Without that CRIMINAL statute I can't help you in the CRIMINAL prosecution.
====
Note: 18 U.S.C.§ 1028 by its own terms is not applicable. Any uneducated idiot can see that.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85341
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me one good reason why I should go out of my way to appease someone who is too lazy to click on a url.
I just "assimilated the information" in an above post and you questioned it's credibility.Would you like a source for this statement?
Lord have mercy.
"Cowardly" bunch on here JS!
They want answers, we give them answers, along with the PROOF to back it up.....and they are AFRAID to "click"......;-)

Let's have a DNA test, shall we?....;-)

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85342
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
I NEVER used the word identical, LIAR!
I said they were the same thing, and they are!
Microfiche, and Microfilm are closely related,
Pedal this on your tricycle:
"Closely related" and "identical" are not the same.
Fraternal twins are closely related but not IDENTICAL.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85343
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Johannes never said he knew how people voted. YOU are the one who said he knew. You get so mixed up in your inventions, fabrications, lies and hatemongering that you don't realise you've gone full circle and the whoppers migrate right back to you.
Lies lies and more lies from foreign matter that doesn't matter.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85344
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Terry Buckeye wrote:
He was legally elected to office by a majority of electoral votes. How is that fraudulent?
In a landslide after the constitutional procedure described in detail in The Federalist to assure that only a constitutionally-qualified American would be elected President of the United States of America was strictly followed on Jan. 8, 2009, by the constitutionally authorized officials.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85345
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

spud wrote:
If everything were as "undeniable" as you say then there would bo no grounds for any lawsuits.
YOU ARE CORRECT -- there are NO GROUNDS.
====
"Appellants' contention [is] that “the original common law definition of an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ is a child born in the country to a United States citizen mother and father.” Appellants' Br. at 18."
“This court employs an objective standard to determine whether or not an appeal is frivolous” which “focuses on the merits of the appeal regardless of good or bad faith.” Hilmon Co. v. Hyatt Int'l, 899 F.2d 250, 253 (3d Cir.1990)(internal quotation omitted). We have stated that “an appeal from a frivolous claim is likewise frivolous.” Beam, 383 F.3d at 108. Appellants had ample notice that this appeal had no merit. They should have been aware that we rejected almost identical claims in Berg, as have courts in other jurisdictions."
Kerchner v. Obama (2010) in which ALL "birther" claims were REJECTED as devoid of any legal or factual merit.
Cancer on the pResidency

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85346
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

DEMOCRATIC SKANK Terri Tanna wrote:
Things are NOT BAD.
More Obama cheer-leading, huh SKANK?
You are an Obot and we all know it!
Quit with your lame charade.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85347
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
If he wasn't eligible to serve the office he should not have been on the ballot and should not have been able to serve. If he lacks the honestly [SIC] and integrity that it takes to be responsible enough to personally follow the requirements of Article II Section 1,he doesn't deserve to serve the office. Just because 62 million people didn't care to follow the requirements of The Constitution doesn't make it right.
The Class knows that Frank lacked the "honest[ly] and integrity to qualify for an appointment to our great nation's esteemed United States Military Academy at West Point, because as a socialist pinko commie he does not accept "The Will of 'WE THE PEOPLE'" and the principles of free market economics.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85348
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
Gilbert wonders why.
“As Ann Dunham engaged in nefarious activities with Frank Marshall Davis, who was likely involved in pornography and prostitution, why would she bring 10 year-old Barry back from Indonesia and tell her father something to the effect of,‘I’m going back to Indonesia, but please take young Barry to Frank’s house a few times a week,’” he said.
The only scenario in which Obama’s regular visits as a child to Davis’ house would make sense, Gilbert said, is if Davis was the real biological father
Gilbert explained that much of what Obama has told the American public of his childhood has been proven false.
“We now know that the family did not stay together in Hawaii until 1962, when the Kenyan Barack Obama went to Harvard to begin his graduate studies as Obama claimed,” Gilbert explained.“Ann Dunham took her infant son with her to Seattle a few weeks after his birth and began studies at the University of Washington, while the Kenyan Obama remained in Hawaii for another year before leaving for Harvard.”
The evidence, Gilbert said,“points to the conclusion that Ann Dunham’s relationship with the Kenyan Obama was a ‘sham’ marriage designed to cover up an illicit affair with Frank Marshall Davis, in which the infant had been conceived.”
Obama’s election was not a sudden political phenomenon, Gilbert maintains.
“It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that Frank Marshall Davis nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii and has been quietly infiltrating the U.S. economy, universities and media for decades,” he said.“To understand Obama’s plans for America, look no further than communist Frank Marshall Davis.”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/was-communist-ment...
Steve
Are you implying that the offical, verified, validated, codified, digitized, facsimile, sanitzed, pasturized, homoginized Hawaiian birth certificate is not correct?
Did you ask Neil Abrecrombie about this?
Are you saying that Dreams from my Father? No
-------
*_*
NOT TO WORRY ABOUT THE FAKE STATE-ISSUED BIRTH DOCUMENT:
#84,506
American Lady wrote:
“Don't be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are IRRELEVANT to Senator Obama's ineligibility to be President.”

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85349
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
The Constitution: From reverence to contempt
Please don't be so hard on your fellow "birthers" -- they are uneducated and don't know NUTTIN about our sacred United States Constitution.
Just Sayin

Toledo, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85350
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
"Cowardly" bunch on here JS!
They want answers, we give them answers, along with the PROOF to back it up.....and they are AFRAID to "click"......;-)
Let's have a DNA test, shall we?....;-)
Knowing the "Useful Idiots" as we do they would just mix and match the results and say the DNA test was inconclusive.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85351
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
<quoted text>
We know it happened in 2008, Got Some Proof?
I can recall when many elections were called BEFORE the polls closed.

Results were based on exit polling. The networks then changed their policy to withhold results until after the polls closed (even if for only ten seconds.)

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85353
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
"Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President."
====
Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President."
”Appellants'[Kerchner's] contention [is] that “the original common law definition of an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ is a child born in the country to a United States citizen mother and father.” Appellants' Br.[by “atty.” Mario Imabozo] at 18. That assertion goes to the merits of whether President Obama is in fact eligible to hold office.”
“This court employs an objective standard to determine whether or not an appeal is FRIVOLOUS which “focuses on the merits of the appeal regardless of good or bad faith.” Hilmon Co. v. Hyatt Int'l, 899 F.2d 250, 253 (3d Cir.1990)(internal quotation omitted). We have stated that “an appeal from a FRIVOLOUS CLAIM is likewise FRIVOLOUS.” Beam, 383 F.3d at 108. Appellants had ample notice that this appeal had NO MERIT. They should have been aware that we rejected almost identical claims in Berg, as have courts in other jurisdictions.”
In Kerchner v. Obama (2010) the United States Supreme rejected expeditiously ALL “birther” claims with prejudice as being devoid of any legal or factual merit. RES JUDICATA.
Next?
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85354
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Just Sayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Knowing the "Useful Idiots" as we do they would just mix and match the results and say the DNA test was inconclusive.
YepperZ...you're probably right =)
Did you see the picture of his so called half brother from China?
Mark? A lot of favorance going on there. That's the Obama side.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85355
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Terri Tanna wrote:
<quoted text>
Please don't be so hard on your fellow "birthers" -- they are uneducated and don't know NUTTIN about our sacred United States Constitution.
You calling the Supreme Court uneducated? and saying they KNOW "nuttin".....?????

“Wise politicians … know that every breach of the fundamental laws, though dictated by necessity, impairs that sacred reverence which ought to be maintained in the breast of rulers towards the constitution of a country, and forms a precedent for other breaches where the same plea of necessity does not exist at all, or is less urgent and palpable.”(Federalist No. 25)

Over the past several years I have on numerous occasions dealt with the profoundly important constitutional issue at stake in the controversy over Barack Obama and the Constitution’s requirement that the president of the United States be a natural born citizen (e.g.,“Obama’s eligibility: The true issue,”“Obama’s eligibility: Will courage or cowardice prevail?”,“The eligibility case Obama wants no one to hear,”“Natural law knows no party,”“Glenn Beck: Sometimes it’s better to be silent,”“The end of the constitutional republic”). Last Monday, in a case in which I was one of the plaintiffs, the U.S. Supreme Court once again evaded its responsibility to treat with respect all the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Given the uniform tenor of its prior actions, there was no reason to expect the Court to act differently in this case.
Ads by Google

2nd Bill of RightsRead the book that will guide us back to good government www.TheNewFederalism.com
Will Obama Re-elected?Have an Opinion on 2012? Share with Others on LiveCitizen! www.livecitizen.com

Because I have written so much about this in the past, and because the Court’s action came as no surprise, I was tempted to let it pass with the same silent contempt the Court is showing for the Constitution. It occurred to me, though, that this is precisely what the smug destroyers of constitutional government are working to achieve. They mean to spread contempt for the Constitution like a silent contagion until the people’s attachment to constitutional self-government atrophies, like limbs benumbed by leprosy.

The Court’s now-routinized disrespect for the terms of the Constitution is just a symptom of the pervasive contempt for constitutional self-government undeniably evident amongst the elitist faction seeking permanently to overthrow it. This is a far cry from Alexander Hamilton’s concern that any such breaches of respect would diminish the “sacred reverence” toward the Constitution wise statesmanship requires.

Is it only a lack of wisdom we have to fear in our times? Would that it were; but the elitist faction tolerates and moves to enlarge the breach Obama’s election represented because they no longer share the commitment of America’s founders to “rest all our political experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government”(Federalist No. 39).

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/the-constitution-f...

Ya DWIDIOT....

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85356
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
They want answers, we give them answers, along with the PROOF to back it up.....[SIC] and they are AFRAID to "click"......[SIC];- )
Let's have a DNA test, shall we?....[SIC] ;-)
State any EVIDENTIARY FACT that PROVES your president is not a natural-born AMERICAN citizen.
(This has been asked at least ninety times without ANY response. BTW, a statement of a legal principle is not an EVIDENTIARY FACT.)
====
“Ellipsis points (three[3] equally spaced periods) mark an omission from a quoted passage.”
Hodges Harbrace Handbook (Thirteenth Edition) at 17i.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85357
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Terri Tanna wrote:
"Things are NOT BAD."
Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
More Obama cheer-leading, huh?
You are an Obot and we all know it!
Quit with your lame charade.
What's so bad about a booming economy with huge corporate profits (due to low labor costs and high unemployment) that benefit EVERY AMERICAN shareholder.

“SAVING BIRTHERS FROM IGNORANCE”

Since: Jul 09

The Farm North of Hinsdale

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85359
Jun 15, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:
Another USURPATION???
WHO NEEDS CONGRESS: OBAMA TO GRANT IMMUNITY TO YOUNG ILLEGALS
Don't you find objectionable executive orders that enforce free market economic principles?
(Does l'il tacky even know what are the free market economic principles?)

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

8 Users are viewing the California Forum right now

Search the California Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Thousands of Blue Sea Creatures Wash Up on Cali... 24 min -Lea- 20
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 1 hr Cecil 52,984
California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 2 hr seekers 4,900
CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 2 hr Pole swap 7,855
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr truth-facts 45,907
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 8 hr Orange Cove cow licker 200,366
California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 9 hr rain or snow to slow 15,928
•••
•••