BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, he never was popular with the Democrats and we Conservatives had issues with him too. What do you expect?

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>He was still ten times better than the guy the is currently occupying the White House. Bush may have let the Democrats push him around for a couple years,but he never wanted to destroy our nation and our economy. Unlike Obama, Bush loves our country.

Just about anyone would be better than Obama.

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The Birfoon plaintiffs requested that the judge not rule in their favor simply because defendant did not attend the hearing. Plaintiffs specifically requested that the judge rule on the merits, and they got their wish.
Another day when it's really sad to be a birfoon.
<quoted text>

Grand Birther wrote:

<quoted text>
Point us to ANY other case in American Jurisprudence where a Judge has acted as the Attorney for a Defendant, who refused to come to court, or send his lawyer to court to defend him.
You can do that, can't you, WoTARD?
The Obama case is the only case that I am aware of, where a defendant who voluntarily refused to come to court was rewarded for thumbing his nose at the court, by having the Judge act as his Attorney, and have the Judge rule in his favor as well, based on the production of no evidence presented by the Defense.
Bet you will not find one either.
Isn't it strange that Georgia suddenly got permits for 2 new Nuclear plants within days of that sham decision?
No permits for new Nuclear plant had been handed out by the Federal Government for about 30 years before that.
Just another coincidence, huh?

Ooooo, it must really upset you when they gave you an .... ugly face!!!

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
Had you clicked on the link you would have readily seen that Kenyans reported their race as African in 61. I suppose you could say they were fortunate there were no 2012 birfoons around telling them how it should be done.
http://www.hist.umn.edu/~rmccaa/IPUMSI/Census...

Several points here. First, Hawaii is not part of Kenya. In is a part of the U.S. and therefore would comply with our customs.
Next, the Kenyan forms are pristine and for a fifty year old document to look that way seems very unusual not to mention .... no signature. In other words, it does dos not look "printed" by means that were available in the early 1960's. It looks computer generated!

JEB wrote:

<quoted text>
that the best you can do after five years of posting?

Is that the best intellectually honest retort you can compile in that empty head of yours?

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
What was the name of the organization who sponsored the African airlift to the US in 59 Frank?
Oh, that’s right, the AFRICAN AMERICAN STUDENTS FOUNDATION (AASF)
http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2010/10-038.html

Isn't that funny that that document was created in ..... 2010? As if it just became historical two years ago!?!
There seems to be a lot of things about Obama that seem to have been created after 2007!!

JEB I Have No Answer wrote:
that the best you can do after five years of posting?

Grand Birther wrote:

<quoted text>
I noticed that you didn't even attempt to address any of the points made in my post.
Oh that's right, YOU CAN'T!
That explains it, my bad.

But he was smart enough to give you an ..... ugly face. How sophomoric!

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you avoid this, hmmm???
No one at Hawaii DOH has any credibility.
Fukino LIED when stating that the original document that she saw was half handwritten and half typewritten.
That is not the document that Obama released!
There must be another document!
This would explain why in one of her statements Fukino used the term "original Vital Records" instead of "original birth certificate".
No one at Hawaii DOH has explained why the document that Onaka's signature stamp was placed on has an error in the stamp, nor why it can be moved about on the document if it was only a scanned document copy that was sent to Obama.
The document is clearly a computer built fraudulent document that was not created by Hawaii DOH!
Of course, no one at Hawaii DOH has explained why that fraudulent document contains no raised visible embossed seal of authenticity that makes it an authentic State of Hawaii issued document.
That is why we know that the document is clearly a computer built fraudulent document that was not created by Hawaii DOH!
Knowing that these are facts, this is indeed reasonable suspicion, if not outright probable cause, to believe that Hawaii DOH is complicit in Obama's fraud.
Fukino needs to be charged and put on the stand to defend her LIE!
Then we tee up Onaka and Fuddy to defend their involvement in Obama's fraud.
You remain a STUPID Obot addicted to Obama ASS-CRACK!
Are you EVER going to prove that something that I have said was not factually correct, and prove it true too?

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you totally capsized? Do you think that anyone in his right mind will read your insane rants? You know something? You make mental masturbation look easy.

My mother has the marriage certificate of her parents who married in New Brunswick, Canada in 1925. With the exception of the seal, the whole document was hand written. It sort of took me by surpise. I don't know if they had run out of printed forms or what. Typewriters were around back in 1925 and I am sure there were a few in Canada then too.

Grand Birther wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, you avoided what was asked for, with the intent of doing so, I'm sure.
Point us to ANY other case in American Jurisprudence where a Judge has acted as the Attorney for a Defendant, who refused to come to court, or send his lawyer to court to defend him.
You can do that, can't you, Poopoo stain?
The Obama case is the only case that I am aware of, where a defendant who voluntarily refused to come to court was rewarded for thumbing his nose at the court, by having the Judge act as his Attorney, and have the Judge rule in his favor as well, based on the production of no evidence presented by the Defense.
Bet you will not find one either.
Isn't it strange that Georgia suddenly got permits for 2 new Nuclear plants within days of that sham decision?
No permits for new Nuclear plants had been handed out by the Federal Government for about 30 years before that.
Just another coincidence, huh?
You remain a STUPID Obot addicted to Obama ASS-CRACK!
You are so STUPID that I just have to laugh!

Asked and answered! Not every judge will grant a default simply because the other party fails to show GB.

Try taking a Lexus dealer to court on a bogus claim that they owe you a new car and see if they grant you a default “WITHOUT PROVING YOUR CASE” simply because the dealer fails to show.

Also see:“ORLY LOSES TO EMPTY TABLE”

And the Court’s judgment: the plaintiffs have no case and no credible evidence, and there is no law to support their claims. Judgment for the defendant, represented only by an empty table, on the merits. Or in this case, utter lack thereof
http://kaystreet.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/orl...

You make me laugh long time GB.

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
I am truly sorry for you, pathetic little Tacky, but the vital birth facts in President's LFBC posted at the White House were very recently verified by Dr. Alvin Onaka, in every last detail, your fixation with Dr. Fukino notwithstanding.
Such verification “shall be considered for all purposes certification that [a] the vital event did occur and [b] that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.” Haw. Rev. Stat.§ 338-14.3 (b).
<><><>< ><><><> <>
1. The original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
2. The information contained in the "Certificate of Live Birth" published at http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/pre... obamas-Iong-formbirth-certific ate and reviewed by me on the date of this verification, a copy of which is attached with your request, matches the information contained in the original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama II, on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health." Alvin T. Onaka, May 31, 2012.
<quoted text>

And Dr. Alvin Onaka is neither impartial or a real document expert, is he?

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Also, it is a birfoon fantasy that the defendants did not present a defense. Everything that they needed to say was submitted in arguments filed with the court. No need to show up for oral arguments.

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly! Never did understand what game Malihi was playing by denying defense motion to quash, but it sure had Orly and GB ecstatic.
We won! Yippeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. LOL
GB makes me laugh long time.

Were they presented in court so that the other side could contest them? It was really funny in that Terri Tunna bashed the judge ..... until his final ruling and then he was a hero!
Yep, according to Terri Tunns, anyone in the military is a grunt .... unless you endorsed Obama like Colon Powell did ... and then you are a hero!

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is not against the law for Obama to request multiple documents. When my father passed I requested TEN copies of his death certificate.
<quoted text>
I DID NOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT "access the original records", did I? Please learn to address the subject at hand which in this case was a person requesting additional copies of his own documents.
This is a typical Libtardian attempt to muddy the waters.

It is as obvious as the nose on one's face that Obumbo and the state of Hawaii are doing all they can to hide the truth.
Hawaii keeps doubling down with hope of concealing their criminal acts.
If Obumbo was born there, it would be so easy to put this to rest.
He can have the "purported" hospital, Kapiolani, release proof of his birth...
Why does he not do this?
He could allow forensic experts to examine any and all documents related to his birth and held by the state.
Why does he not do this?
Regardless of where Obumbo was born, there are obviously very severe and damning evidence to make him not illegible to be POTUS.

If his father was really Barak Obama Sr., we know that he was not a US citizen.
In fact, a low life Communist anti-American, just as his son.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Several points here. First, Hawaii is not part of Kenya. In is a part of the U.S. and therefore would comply with our customs.
Next, the Kenyan forms are pristine and for a fifty year old document to look that way seems very unusual not to mention .... no signature. In other words, it does dos not look "printed" by means that were available in the early 1960's. It looks computer generated!

Not surprising Rogue. You’d probably say the same thing if someone handed you an original printing of the Gutenberg bible.

I suppose only you can explain what our customs have to do with how an African relates to his.

According to the Department of Health in Hawaii, the race was self-reported by the parents. That was and obviously still is “our” custom.

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Isn't that funny that that document was created in ..... 2010? As if it just became historical two years ago!?!
There seems to be a lot of things about Obama that seem to have been created after 2007!!

Are you nuts? The occurrences of the African airlifts to the US are a matter of historical record. You really do say stupid shit Rogue.
http://africanactivist.msu.edu/organization.p...

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Also, it is a birfoon fantasy that the defendants did not present a defense. Everything that they needed to say was submitted in arguments filed with the court. No need to show up for oral arguments.
<quoted text>
Were they presented in court so that the other side could contest them? It was really funny in that Terri Tunna bashed the judge ..... until his final ruling and then he was a hero!
Yep, according to Terri Tunns, anyone in the military is a grunt .... unless you endorsed Obama like Colon Powell did ... and then you are a hero!

Is Sean Hannity afraid of Jesse Ventura Rogue? He sure looked anxious to me. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Anyway.
The guy who signed the NDAA bill 2012 deserves to go in jail, with or without the american citizenship.
In one night Obama has convinced me that the war on terror was as fake as the war on drugs. It is pure fear selling business.
When I heard about the NDAA notes, I dismiss them as "conspiracy theories", but then the bill has been signed, during the new year night.
You can sum up the bill by "we are the terrorists".

It is real and easily verifiable. Obama will be known as the first president who made an attempt to install a dictatorship in America.

Just now, the bill has been declared anti-constitutional, yet the Obama's administration continue to vetoed any changes.

It is hard to verify where Obama is born, but it is easy to verify that he deserves to be arrested and judged for terrorism. To threat any "suspect of threat" of indefinite detention without trial (NDAA)*is* terrorism.

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
We can’t expect to solve our problems if all we do is tear each other down. You can disagree with a certain policy without demonizing the person who espouses it. You can question somebody’s views and their judgment without questioning their motives or their patriotism. Throwing around phrases like “socialists” and “Soviet-style takeover” and “fascist” and “right-wing nut”-- that may grab headlines, but it also has the effect of comparing our government, our political opponents, to authoritarian, even murderous regimes.
Now, we’ve seen this kind of politics in the past. It’s been practiced by both fringes of the ideological spectrum, by the left and the right, since our nation’s birth. But it’s starting to creep into the center of our discourse. And the problem with it is not the hurt feelings or the bruised egos of the public officials who are criticized. Remember, they signed up for it. Michelle always reminds me of that. The problem is that this kind of vilification and over-the-top rhetoric closes the door to the possibility of compromise.
It undermines democratic deliberation. It prevents learning –- since, after all, why should we listen to a “fascist,” or a “socialist,” or a “right-wing nut,” or a left-wing nut”? It makes it nearly impossible for people who have legitimate but bridgeable differences to sit down at the same table and hash things out. It robs us of a rational and serious debate, the one we need to have about the very real and very big challenges facing this nation. It coarsens our culture, and at its worst, it can send signals to the most extreme elements of our society that perhaps violence is a justifiable response.
BARACK OBAMA, remarks at University of Michigan, May 1, 2010
You will never hear anything close to that from Mitt Romney or any Republican Frank.

For Frank, Obama's remarks ontolerance will only confirm that the president is a leftist socialist communist and KGB agent.

American Lady wrote:

<quoted text>
That will work....the generalities of it....
No ID's of anyone......Thanks...;-)

More birther confusion.?????????

Grand Birther wrote:

WoTARD, where did you go?
Did you suddenly discover that you had a vagina instead of balls?
Hee, Hee, Hee.

Refer to post 43801 and bingo, there you are.

Corr : 83401

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Ever hear of a Memorandum with points and authority?
Nothing else needed to be stated. An empty chair would suffice, and it did. The defense stated their case prior to the hearing. The birfoons had nothing in response. Case closed. Get a life.
<quoted text>

Of course I have heard of a Memorandum with points and authority.

But I asked you to prove that one was filed in the Georgia ballot challenge, and as expected you failed to do so!
I am not surprised, as I can find no evidence that a Memorandum with points and authority was filed in that case.

Media Blackout in Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Case

Last week, I noted that Obama turned his back not just on Arizona's Governor Jan Brewer, but also on the laws of the State of Georgia. I closed my column, "Georgia Ballot Challenge: Obama Walks on By," with the observation: "And most of the media has followed along right behind him."
At the time, I had just witnessed an historic hearing that actually discussed the eligibility of the sitting president of the United States to run for a second term. The president had been subpoenaed to appear, and instead of his attorney respectfully following protocol to have that subpoena recalled, both Obama and his attorney, Michael Jablonski, simply failed to show up at all or offer any defense whatsoever.
http://www.drudge.com/archive/152954/media-bl...

I also asked you to point us to ANY other case in American Jurisprudence where a Judge has acted as the Attorney for a Defendant, who refused to come to court, or send his lawyer to court to defend him.
You couldn't do that either, could you, WoTARD?

The Obama case is the only case that I am aware of, where a defendant who voluntarily refused to come to court was rewarded for thumbing his nose at the court, by having the Judge act as his Attorney, and have the Judge rule in his favor as well, based on the production of no evidence presented by the Defense.
Bet you will not find one either.

Isn't it strange that Georgia suddenly got permits for 2 new Nuclear plants within days of that sham decision?
No permits for new Nuclear plants had been handed out by the Federal Government for about 30 years before that.
Just another coincidence, huh?