BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Judged:

2

2

2

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Speaker Boehner should do to O'Bummer's what Speaker San Fran Nan did to Bush's last budget!!! Put it in the trash can, wait until after the election, then work with the president elect to craft a new one!!!

Judged:

2

2

2

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I could, but I will wait until O'Bummer releases his real Birther Certificate.

Judged:

3

3

2

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
what is says is:
'Voluntarily inactive'

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I could, but I will wait until O'Bummer releases his real Birther Certificate.

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Like Keith Olbermann did to Rick Santorum on about an award he gave to Jerry Sandusky way back in 2002? Wait until about 2:08;
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
And you Libtards claimed he received the award AFTER his sexual assaults on children became know last year!!!

Judged:

3

3

3

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, Georgia Court ruled that Obama is eligible.

Judged:

3

3

3

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm certain that John has received a double secret email claiming that Obama spent BILLIONS just not attending the GA non-hearing ...(because iT was a landmark case)

Judged:

3

3

3

John wrote:

<quoted text>
In 1993. Just four year after becoming licensed. Why would anyone work so hard to become a lawyer and give up their ability to be one 4 years later? Many people stop practicing law but keep their status. The only logical conclusion is
Wait for it
Yes, it was either stop practicing or face charges. The license were not voluntarily place inactive. It was by court order. Barry has also lost his ability to practice. Wonder what those two were up to?

Judged:

3

2

2

John wrote:

<quoted text>
That ruling was wrong. You can not win a case when your not even there to defend.
I can sue you for taking a bat to my car even though you didn't do it. If you do not show up to defend yourself the court will rule in my favor. Soetoro was in contempt for not appearing. He is abusing the power of the white house when he should be honoring that position. He has plenty to hide and has spent millions hiding it.

Judged:

3

2

2

John wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you people spend so much time defending him?
He has ruined your economy as much as he has mine.
He has put your kids and grandkids in as much debt as he has mine.
He has attacked your freedoms as much as he has mine.
He is " the most powerful man on earth " so why do you think he needs little ol you to defend him?
He is crap and those in congress are made from the same filth. The system is broken.

Judged:

2

2

1

Jacques in Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Rogue just wrote QUOTE "And about the Great Depression ending in 1933, I have never claimed it and most sources to not claim that but several Progressive sight" UNQUOTE A barefaced lie. You know it, I know it, everyone who writes in Topix knows it. You reported that some "libtards" (sic) said it ended in 1933. What's wrong with you? I simply asked where you got that. Are you concocting the same lies for the Philipps lamps and the imaginary mine?

Judged:

3

3

2

tree hugger wrote:

Did the psych. ward run out of crayons and coloring books for the inmates?

Judged:

3

3

2

Johannes wrote:

<quoted text>
Tommy,
That's crap....
You previously said:
1) that liberals claim that the Great Depression ended in 1933
2) FDR took a 'run of the mill' recession and turned it into the Great Depression
Twist and turn, but your lies remain....

Judged:

3

3

2

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, not only did they run out of coloring books and crayons, someone forgot to lock up the office with their their computer!!!

Judged:

2

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am fully aware of the "classical" definition of Liberal but modern liberalism is not the same. You add one and two and come out with six!!!
And about the Great Depression ending in 1933, I have never claimed it and most sources to not claim that but several Progressive sight do because how else can they explain FDR's economy. But the problem with you Libtards claiming that, then how do you explain 1938-39. Was it the Great Recession or still part of the Great Depression?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_liberalis ...
Modern Liberalism = Progressivism = Socialism
<quoted text>
First of all I said that SOME liberals claim that the Great Depression ended in 1933. But then they have a big problem explaining what happened in 1938-39.
Well then, why did the Great Depression last from 1929 until about 1940 then? And how can you explain what happened in 1938-39 as FDR had been president starting in 1933 and he had a Democrat majority Congress to boot?!?

Judged:

6

6

4

Grand Birther wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, and just so you know who I am.

Judged:

9

9

9

AmericanLady wrote:

It IS "in" the Constitution.......{SIC - CHILD-LIKE PUNCTUATION] LAW of the Land!!!
NOT mere opinion ;-)

Judged:

6

5

3

Cancer on the pResidency wrote:

They call it prima facie evidence, right?

Judged:

5

5

5

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

we have an Electoral College is the same reason why we have two Houses of Congress. The less populated states were worried that the states with the larger populations would rule Congress so they gave every state two Senators.
Likewise the devised the same for selecting the number of the members of the Electoral College, one for every Senator and every Representative.
But Libtards don't like that because it favors the smaller less populated states which means it is possible to get the majority of the popular vote but still lose the Electoral College vote. And since most large states are Libtard states, it is not in their favor.