Tough road ahead for Boxer

Patrick n Angela wrote:

Boxer is OK.

JohnB wrote:

Congress is a cesspool of liars, thieves, inside traders, traitors, drunks, criminals, and other low level swine who, as individuals (not all, but many), will do anything to enhance their lives, fortunes and power, all at the expense of the People of the United States and its Constitution, in order to be continually reelected.
It is time for new blood. ANY new blood. These are supposed to be "public servants", remember?

OutWithBOXER wrote:

She's under qualified for the job! She's an embarassment for California and women alike! She's clueless and needs to be voted out in 2010!!!

Vileorc wrote:

Actually, Feinstein is more of a Repub than Boxer. Feinstein is Cali's own Leiberman. She has sided with the GOP more often than not. If you want to get rid of someone, get rid of her, not Boxer.

dane thorsen wrote:

<quoted text>
You flatter Sen. Feinstein by claiming that she might use her mind rather than her robotic allegiance to the most destructive political party in American..the sub human California Democrats.
Look around. They destroy most all they touch. I was a Calif. dem until I grew a pair.

Judged:

1

SAW wrote:

Don't throw out experience and senority when we need it.

Twisted sista wrote:

Only a self destructive mental defective or a Calif. Democrat would re-elect something like Boxer.

Duh wrote:

No one is less worthy of the Senate than Boxer. She will easily be elected by the drooling imbeciles, racist chicano anarchists and greedy Union thugs who call themselves Dems in CA.
No State is in worse shape and no State Party is less worthy of respect.

falcon wrote:

<quoted text>
Sadly I agree, she will get re-elected. Hopefully she'll have to put up a good fight this time around. I can't imagine my fellow Californians wising up enough to get rid of her.

SAW wrote:

<quoted text> I have never viewed her as anything but a representative who has always been concerned about CA. In the Congress, seniority is what counts, and the citizens are going to make a big mistake if they trade that seniority for a new jr. senator. That mistake will be compounded if the replacement is a failed CEO who got a multimillion dollar golden parachute.

tatooedbagOshet wrote:

<quoted text> You poor dumb baboon

Jimmy wrote:

Boxer is a racist:

jak wrote:

Remember; the Republican party did not give one congressional vote to implement Social Security in the 1930 or Medicare in the 1960's, they called it socailism.