USC shows its staying power

ART DECO MAN wrote:

<quoted text>> That'll do the trick!
>;)

Hey art deco man were are you lsu sucks ha..ha.. ha.. overated!.

BigDan wrote:

<quoted text>
Doesn't matter, U$C shouldn't be ranked above Geogia nor Oklahoma.

Georgia Southern W 45-21
Central Michigan W 56-17
South Carolina W 14-7
Arizona State W 27-10
Alabama L 30-41 --
Tennessee W 26-14

Compare mutual opponents:

Georgia has only played Bamma & ASU. ASU was in the game for most of it.

USC blew out ASU and shut them out.

Tennessee got beat by UCLA? who sucks.

Tenn was within 6 points with 2:50 left to play in the 4th QTR.

Georgia might be overated a bit.

Talk to me after they play LSU Floridia Kentucky and Aubie.

Offensive line still to young this year.

2-2 at best

Art Deco is a piece of shit

joe blue wrote:

<quoted text>Hey art deco man were are you lsu sucks ha..ha.. ha.. overated!.

LSU SUCKS wrote:

Art Deco is a piece of shit
<quoted text>

Go choke on a dyck !!

How bout them Tar Heels lol.

the village idiot school is #6 in the country - where is touchdown jesus .....nice try.

BigDan wrote:

<quoted text>
this coming from the village idiot.

USC STEVE wrote:

the village idiot school is #6 in the country - where is touchdown jesus .....nice try.
<quoted text>

Dude, don't count them out until we're actually done with them. They're starting to put things together right now, and Clausen is getting better with every game. I expect the ND team we face next month will be a lot better than the ND team right now. At least we have the home-field advantage. I'd hate for our unsteady-O to have to deal with their crowd.

Yes WE CAN OBAMAMAAMA wrote:

Congratulations on the great play yesterday you fing loser!!!
<quoted text>

> Hey bud! I can take a loss like a man. LSU got their @sses handed to them. No excuses!!! And I'll be here win or lose. I won't go slithering off and hiding under the nearest rock, like some of the little low life's on these threads.
>:|

LSU SUCKS wrote:

Art Deco is a piece of shit
<quoted text>

> Hey, big guy ... why don't you use your real forum name. A real man will stand up face to face with another man. Now, come back with your real forum name, and let's discuss your hatred for me like real men. I'll be waiting!
>:|

joe blue wrote:

<quoted text>Hey art deco man were are you lsu sucks ha..ha.. ha.. overated!.

> Yeah, Mr. blue, you're right on this one ... LSU did suck against Florida. The Tigers got their @sses handed to them.
>:|

the pac 10 sucks this year.

manhattan beach dude wrote:

the pac 10 sucks this year.

Arent you wasting time..when you could be laying out your school clothes for tomorrow ?

manhattan beach dude wrote:

the pac 10 sucks this year.

It's a good thing that PAC-1 doesn't AKA USC LOL~!

triple6vamp wrote:

How bout them Tar Heels lol.

you are one ugly bitch...by the way, goth is so 80's

USC STEVE wrote:

the village idiot school is #6 in the country - where is touchdown jesus .....nice try.
<quoted text>

well they aren't losing to unranked teams, I can tell you that.

Have fun losing at the Gator Bowl!!!!

NOTRE DAME IS DOG SHT wrote:

Have fun losing at the Gator Bowl!!!!

sure thing poopie shorts

no your school sucks (ucla) this year ....usc will have to pick up the slack for the other 9 pac 10 schools..cal oregon and oregon state will be in the top 25 by the end of they year....one more loss and bowl game for you...but like you said this is a rebuilding year.....and next year and the year after that and the 5 years prior...wow thats a 8 year rebuilding process.....keep up the good work!

manhattan beach dude wrote:

the pac 10 sucks this year.

USC STEVE wrote:

no your school sucks (ucla) this year ....usc will have to pick up the slack for the other 9 pac 10 schools..cal oregon and oregon state will be in the top 25 by the end of they year....one more loss and bowl game for you...but like you said this is a rebuilding year.....and next year and the year after that and the 5 years prior...wow thats a 8 year rebuilding process.....keep up the good work!
<quoted text>

Not exactly. I don't think Neuheisel is buying your 8 year rebuilding theory.

probably not cause neuheisel will only last 3 years

R U Serious wrote:

<quoted text>
Not exactly. I don't think Neuheisel is buying your 8 year rebuilding theory.