The Vikings king in the NFC North?

GBPfan wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks for the stats but I wasn’t comparing Kampman and Allen. I said Allen was a fantastic player. Did you read the post? I was bustin your balls over the nonsense comparison to Culpepper.
It was ridiculous and you know it that is why you are all pissed off.
He had one good year? That is what you said. Which year was the good year, when he had 15.5 sacks or 12? Seems to me both years are good. 2 Pro Bowl years! I didn’t say anything about comparing him to Allen! So it doesn’t seem he is fizzling out like Culpepper which is what you were implying by saying he is “PROBABLY” that type of player!
Do not get mad at me cause you wrote something stupid in your little pissing contest with Kstaff.
Have a Happy 4th!!! From the punk a$$ kid in Finland

Stubby wrote:

<quoted text>
So he had 2 good years. 2 out of 7 is still 28% of his career as a top DE. Until he can sustain that level for at least 2 more years, the jury is out on whether he is great or is a flash in the pan alla Culpepper.

Blane wrote:

LOL you Vikings fans are funny! But sorry it still Packers year to win the north.

Digger wrote:

Both teams our near the top of the NFL, but the edge has to go to the Pack. They really don't a weak link on their team. Plus they have so much depth at all the positions. People giving the North to Vikings because Favre is gone, need to take a look at the Vikings QBs. I'd take Rodgers and Brohm, over any of their three. Now to all the hype about their so called #1 run defense, very overrated as far as I'm concerned. Unless you're the Bears, why would anybody run against them when you can eat their db's up all day? Their best db is a Packer reject (Sharper,) who is always in the wrong position to make the play. I'm always reminded how sorry he is, every time I turn on the NFL network they're showing him giving up the TD to TD, in the Wildcard Game against the 49ers. The PACK is a more complete team, better overall defense, solid running game, Vikes can't keep up with the BIG FIVE, and we still have a better QB. How soon people forget the 34-0 BEAT DOWN the Pack put on them. Last time I looked Farve didn't play defense, but according to the last game the Vikings don't either.

Judged:

1

Vikes_2000 wrote:

<quoted text>Hey Digger, calculate in the improvements the Vikes have made to their pass defense before making ignorant comments.

Sergio wrote:

Vikings wont even make it to the playoffs......
and the packers will even with Rodgers as QB vikings
suck....... Peterson is going to get hurt in the 4th week.
Packer Fan....

DWIGHT wrote:

We'll see about that Pete.
PACK STILL RULES!!!!!

Blane wrote:

Sorry but next year it be
Packers 12-4
Vikings 10-6
Lions 6-10
Bears 4-12

KStaff wrote:

Wow, this Jared Allen guy must be extraterrestrial. Sixteen sacks and he was the ONLY player their opponents had to scheme against. What, he must have had to bust through constant triple and quadruple man blocks to get to the QB. It's not crazy to think he will get a million sacks with the Williams boys next to him. You Viking fans have me shakin' in my boots.