crime statistics by race for those who cry racism...

Marcus wrote:

Well Marvo "Da" Mighty (with stress on the "dah" firmly understood), I must admit that "Looking at the space between" motto following your "highly" creative AKA must reflect what you see between your ears when you look in the mirror. And while I would like to reply in a more thorough manner I am unable at this time. However, I will be glad to enlighten you later tonight.

So basically aside from a Rather impotent and stupidly attempted insult, you said basically nothing... you ignored the U.S. Federal Government Web site I based my response on. secondly there was no denial... TO DENY something is to Say IT IS NOT as stated by someone else. But since you failed so miserably at insulting me, and obviously Reading is a tad too difficult , abstract concepts like comparative analysis is too hard for you to follow. If you had indeed paid attention instead of letting the hatred and limp , pathetic comments you mustered up , you would have seen the flaw in the initial comment made, and the error was pointed out ,the expanded to a more realistic set of data, then sited in a corresponding Site and data source the DEPARTMENT of Justice (FBI, CIa, NSa, State police, City Police) which states that the disparity you stated is WRONG. Not my anger a Federal Government Website, you are jst upset, because the data trends to reverse what you believe so deeply, It shows that the Savages are as close as the face in the mirror and NOT the Blackman, that the majority of Crime in this country are indeed NOT Blackpeople. And that crushes your sensibility. So you act like a child and choose to pick on my Screename.

BTW you cannoT see SPACE , so the comment about looking at DA Spaces in between was just sad. and the proper effection of Clulessness is "DUH" not "DAH". So there is That. Nice try , but The only Denial is yours feel free to comment, so I can take apart another one of your posts, its rather easy . While you CANNOT find anything to debunk my findings.

TA TA and good luck...

"TA TA" ????? Marvy, Marv. What are we to do with you? Need you be reminded that you don't own this blog and thus do not retain the right to kiss off anyone from this forum - not even those annoying types of your limited intellect. Therefore, although it is quite in keeping with your black arrogance (more like ignorance)to demand otherwise, I'm not going anywhere. Thank you, nonetheless, for the clear demonstration of the black attitude in it's true glory (with appologies to those fine members of the black community who are unlike this twit).

Now I'm sorry to start out this way but I'm rather dissapointed, Marvy. I had suggested that you not bring a knife to a gun fight didn't I. Well, sorry to say but based upon that pathetic rant you offered above I must suggest that you didn't even bring the knife. Wait a minute, Marvo Dah, maybe this will clarify it for you: "I says Marvo my man, man I axed you not to be bringin' no knife to no f***ing gun fight!" Got it now? That-a-boy.

Alright Marvin, in keeping with your commentary regarding stats, you failed to make mention that the reporting style of the fed's (if not the data collection itself) has changed in a decidedly politicaly correct fashion. In light of this I direct you to an article that I will post on this blog seperately since it will not likely fit within a single blog. No pictures, Marvy - you're going to have to buckle down a bit for this educational experience.

PS Marvy, Marv: The "Dah" as opposed to "Duh" was simply in keeping with the "Da" in your namesake. Didn't pick up on that, huh? Of course you're no doubt of the conviction that only the negro is permitted to butcher the English language.

Taboo! The Truth about Black Crime, II by Gene Lalor in Current Affairs (submitted 2009-09-30)

As long as mankind is imperfect, human societies will be imperfect and one glaring imperfection is the prevalence of criminal activities. When we ignore or deny the truth concerning the perpetrators of crime we not only perpetuate but encourage such activities.

Such is the prevailing wisdom today in America where political correctness-and fear-dictate domestic policy with regard to law enforcement, such as with profiling, and media reports regarding Black on Black and Black on White crimes.

As noted in the first of this "Taboo!" series, "It's one thing if Blacks choose to maim and murder other Blacks. When they choose to visit mayhem on others, they should take into account that they are a minority," http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/... , point being that neither the majority of a people and certainly not a minority are permitted to get away with murder. And murder, as well as every other crime imaginable, is rampant in Black communities.

One oft-heard, simplistic defense for Black crime stats is that they aren't true. It's a simplistic argument (Marvy is a simplistic guy) since Whites outnumber Blacks in America by a ratio of 5 to 1 so that more Caucasian reprobates would be reasonable. We also hear that so great a percentage of Blacks, principally, young, male Blacks, are imprisoned in America's jails not due to their crimes but because of racial discrimination. That's tantamount to saying that a much lower percentage of White people who should be in prison are comfortably ensconced in their homes watching the boob tube and swilling Budweisers simply because of their race. In other words, murders, robberies, assaults, rapes, burglaries, etc. have absolutely nothing to do with rates of incarceration. It all goes back to racism, as does the sad inability of swine to fly.

Then we come to the issue of interracial crimes. Wikipedia cites some astoundingly chilling statistics on that subject from a recent study. Using 1994 figures, "Whites committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 62.55 per 100,000, while the corresponding black rate was 3,493.63 per 100,000, a figure 55.85 times that of the white rate... the average black person was 56 times more likely to a commit act of criminal violence against a white person than a white person was to commit the same kind of act against a black person... for every violent crime committed by a white against a black, there were 56 corresponding violent acts committed by blacks against whites."

Those numbers are 15 years old due to the subsequent FBI decision to cease and desist in the practice of analyzing crime data according to racial components. Political Correctness wins again. Anyone care to bet those numbers are far worse in 2009 Obamaland?

One researcher has uncovered such stats as:
"* Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.
* When blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.
* Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
* Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black:" http://bit.ly/14NRHJ

America can go on ignoring basic truths about crime and interracial relations. We can go on pretending that we don't have a very serious problem. We can go on telling ourselves in Panglossian fashion that we live in the best of all racial worlds where all is good and everything is beautiful. When reality finally bites us on the ****, we may think differently.
Maybe.

Marcus wrote:

"TA TA" ????? Marvy, Marv. What are we to do with you? Need you be reminded that you don't own this blog and thus do not retain the right to kiss off anyone from this forum -

Says the Kettle. Need I remind you it was your own flippant remarks that initiated this exchange,it was your own avarice and attempt to insult that cheapened the intial exchange. But When he truly inane and worthless have nothing to say, it is often then that they decide to resort to base , and vulgar benalities allthe wile diverting atention from the core conversation. In each of your rather limited and quite similar attacks we learened two things .

1. you are Easily angered
2. You have little Imagination
3. Your attempt to act sperior comes of a tad Lame, probably due to some sort of mental or physical deficiency
4. When Confronted by unbiased Data, you resort to tossing books written by heavily Biased writers as some sort of Proof of your claims, Mind you this books like that one are written to effect a certain Audience and are representaive of Skewed data.

And that leads to the analysis of Crime itself. The above examples are Prime attributes of Criminals, each one can exist on its own, but most of ten then not they exist in multiples. So when you do have someone Delusional abot thier palce in the world , angry at being made to feel inferior by someone who mistakenly thinks them selves superior. Well those persons of a less deveoped sense of self resort to more simplistic ways of taking back personal power.

On the topic at hand that is the cause of crime , that removal of personal power (real or not) if it is perceived by someone they will act out. Sadly too many people in this country have a "victims" mentality which instead of making them overcome or PUSH harder they gave in, and of all the Ethnic groups in the country the bgges identifier with that feeling of nothingness of being not quite invited to the party is the Blacks in this Nation in particular.

In your case the experiment proved that. You went immediately for the Admonishment of what you think I am doing, all the while excusing your own, You immediately went to the I am Superior because I am talking now and you can't stop me ("knife to a gun fight" euphamism) The yo immediatel launched into an undirected rather drunken stance that was off the mark to justify your point, all while making the same tired effectations of Mintrelization in some rather small, weak way to goad me into a tirade that would satisfy your need for attention.

Nice Try, but do try to stay on topic....

Marcus wrote:

Taboo! The Truth about Black Crime, II by Gene Lalor in Current Affairs (submitted 2009-09-30)
As long as mankind is imperfect, human societies will be imperfect and one glaring imperfection is the prevalence of criminal activities. When we ignore or deny the truth concerning the perpetrators of crime we not only perpetuate but encourage such activities.
Such is the prevailing wisdom today in America where political correctness-and fear-dictate domestic policy with regard to law enforcement, such as with profiling, and media reports regarding Black on Black and Black on White crimes.

This particialr publication, is qlready going inthe wrong direction it only identifies Black on Black / Black on White Crime

The exclusion of other variables of crime even in the Preface is clear the book is for a tageted Audience. The data collected in that is when viewed only to ine point accurate but only when the data is presented as the ONLY point of reference, Outside of its intended context it fails to deliver.

Now a more accurate Body of Criminology is one I ran across a while back... http://www.ncjrs.gov/criminal_justice2000/vol...

many noted Authors and Material Experts contribud to this..
Janet Reno - former attorney general
Karen Heimer - Womens Rights and Crime prevention Advicates
Ramiro Martinez, Jr., and Matthew T. Lee - speaking about the role of immigration and its role in crime.
Graham C. Ousey - Urban Antropology analysis about Regional and industrialized areas and the crimes that are committed.

There are many more people who contributed to the compilation, most interesting is the last one. Ousey makes alot of the same claims your own author stated, but not in the myopic context of it being BECAUSE of thier skin color as a Biological factor, but more of a physical barrier, one of Perception in short.

Gene Lalor, is a person who thinks a Ph.D somehow makes him a sage of all sages. Most credible writers and even political types see him as a Don Quiote persona , Tilting at anyand all controversial topics that offend his Ultra Conservative mentality, all the While betrayingthe very idea of conservatism by making commenst that lash out at the ver idea of American ideals as much as he thinks it will fix them.

Now I am sure Lalor has hadsome good points, most of ten these people do, but you cannot build a head of steam in support based on one or two hits.

Marcus wrote:

Whites committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 62.55 per 100,000, while the corresponding black rate was 3,493.63 per 100,000, a figure 55.85 times that of the white rate... the average black person was 56 times more likely to a commit act of criminal violence against a white person than a white person was to commit the same kind of act against a black person... for every violent crime committed by a white against a black, there were 56 corresponding violent acts committed by blacks against whites."

Actually thsis is not so true. The DOJ does indeed have Race based crime statistics on thier web sites. You might want to look it up. also wikipedia for it's intent is a good resourse ,but its open editiable content make it somewhat unreliable and prone to data manipulation. Especially hen the dats is based on the tonry report from 1995 , and based heavily on Bell Curve derived examples of data modeling. Both of which were discredited by EVERY major body of Data modeling, Anthropological, and Statisical analysis body of expertise out at the time.

funny thing is the misuse of statistical data to predict a trend.
its not as simple as multiplying a variable. That is using data asming all things are the same and at a constant rate or exposure. That is not a VALID model to use when speaking baout people, or a society since at its nature it's living and evolving, there for teh changes are consant and minute or grand depending on ebviromental factors.

Try these instead the numbers are fair, and I toss them at people on both sides who try the same lie. WHITES ARE BAD (LIE) BLACKS ARE BAD (LIE) humanity is and of itslef benign it is the circumstances that lead us one way or another .

look for yourself
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.ht...

Canada Data :
http://news.therecord.com/article/363994

William McPherson on British Race base crime.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/speci...

Rate of child abuse by race:
White = 51%
African American = 25%
Hispanic = 15%
American Indian/Alaska Natives = 2%
Asian/Pacific Islanders = 1%

these are the actual numbers from a real Child Abuse prevention organization.

To Jason: Very interesting research you've offered up and the first thing that pops up when one Google’s "Child abuse rates by race". What you failed to mention is that those numbers reflect raw totals and are not proportional by race.

In that the population in the U.S. is approximately 12% black one might have hoped for a PROPORTIONAL representation in crime rates. However, even without removing the politically correct blinders of the day we can see that blacks take first prize in even this cowardly act (child abuse) in sunny California. The educated thinker might be inclined to think that in states with much larger numbers of blacks that number increases both in raw form AND proportionally.

Here's some stats that are entirely contradictory to your "first to pop up on Google" research. Facts are not prejudicial. They speak for themselves unless skewed by the dysfunction of a politically correct "the Emperor has no cloths" mindset.

Enjoy!

Substantiated Cases of Child Abuse, by Race/Ethnicity: 2008
California Rate per 1,000

African American/Black 24.6
Asian/Pacific Islander 4.0
Caucasian/White 8.3
Hispanic/Latino 9.9

Definition: Rate of substantiated cases of child abuse per 1,000 children ages 0-17, by race/ethnicity.

Data Source: Needell,****., et al. Child Welfare Services Reports for California. Retrieved 07/06/09, from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. http://cssr.berkeley.edu/CWSCMSreports/

Footnote: A child is counted only once (per year, per county), in the category of highest severity reported. LNE means that there were fewer than five cases.

Before Marvy points out my type-o it's "clothes" not "cloths". Marv will attempt to imply that a simple type-o renders one's entire entry insignificant.

Close very close, but not quite accurate.

Now When those same numbers are taken into ACTUAL proportion
We have numbers more clearly representative

For instance
Center for Social Services Research
University of California at Berkeley
California Child Population (0-17) and Children with Child Maltreatment Allegations, Substantiations, and Entries
Incidence per 1,000 Children
Agency Type=Child Welfare
Jan 1, 2008 to Dec 31, 2008
The population of Children Identified as Black in California :585,702
Reported Allegation : 67,187
Substantiated allegations : 14,534
Percentage of Substantiations For this Group : 45.9 percent

The population of Children Identified as White/Caucasian in California : 3,103,380
Reported Allegation : 124,409
Substantiated allegations : 25,870
Percentage of Substantiations For this Group: 33.0 percent

When you put the above numbers into perspective they are again subject to the scrutiny of proper data modeling. The numbers you showed were of the Substantiated findings so out of 1000 cases processed 8.3 percent were substantiated (blacks 24.8), And out of the Total Allegation (same 1000 subset 20.8 Percent were abused white children , compared to 21.6 Percent Being Black)

Your Data also lacked the race of the offender (only the victim), and the assumption made is that the person who abused the child is of the same ethnicity as the child victim.

Rates are based on "un-duplicated" counts of children with allegations, substantiations, and entering care during the time period.

The Educated person would run the database query and see the results as cumulative data about the Victims of abuse (in all it's forms)

Data Source: CWS/CMS 2009 Quarter 1 Extract.
Population Data Source: California Department of Finance annual population projections (Based on the 2000 U.S. Census).
Program version: 1.10 Database version: 5D6ACFB0

Marcus wrote:

. The educated thinker might be inclined to think that in states with much larger numbers of blacks that number increases both in raw form AND proportionally.
Here's some stats that are entirely contradictory to your "first to pop up on Google" research. Facts are not prejudicial. They speak for themselves unless skewed by the dysfunction of a politically correct "the Emperor has no cloths" mindset.
Enjoy!
Substantiated Cases of Child Abuse, by Race/Ethnicity: 2008
California Rate per 1,000
African American/Black 24.6
Asian/Pacific Islander 4.0
Caucasian/White 8.3
Hispanic/Latino 9.9
Definition: Rate of substantiated cases of child abuse per 1,000 children ages 0-17, by race/ethnicity.

Marcus wrote:

Before Marvy points out my type-o it's "clothes" not "cloths". Marv will attempt to imply that a simple type-o renders one's entire entry insignificant.

Hardly since I have repeatedly demonstrated a less that proficient ability to type, error free.

Well hello Marv-oh. Somehow I knew you’d factor in even though the exchange had shifted to myself and another fellow. I had not even read the blog in weeks. Oh well, the more the merrier I say.
Close very close, but not quite accurate."

Now, for some misguided reason you nonchalantly put forth your view as if we’d all agreed that you alone are the grand authority of all things statistical. Let’s get this part straight right away - you are not nor have I ever considered you to posses such authority. This is further understood when one considers the selectively of any data you've sighted here. Therefore, when you offer up statements such as "... close but not quite accurate .." you do little for your cause other than reveal the ethno-centric arrogance from which your point of view hales.

You know Marv, one need not resort to statistics to instinctually know in their heart of hearts that if you park your nice car in the black areas of Detroit MI you can kiss it goodbye 9.9999 times out of ten. One need not consult with the latest propaganda to note that the most dangerous cities in the U.S. are those with the largest black populations - new data released just today point again to this very fact but most of us already knew this. One need not consult with Marv-O to know that if you go walking at night the streets of Philly, Chicago, Miami, L.A., Newark or Camden N.J., N.Y. and on and on that you stands a better than good chance of dying by way of a complete BLACK stranger for what might be had in your wallet, purse or perhaps for no reason at all. This applies whether the victim be white or black.

Instinctual conviction is not only legitimate but absolutely necessary in terms of survival of all things alive. I would never, for example, walk the streets of Detroit waiting for the first thug to pop out (and that would not take long my friend) with gun in hand only to refer him to YOUR statistical superiority. "No sir Mr. Black man, this can't be. You see Marv says it ain't so. It's all right here in his blog entries. In fact, gimme the gun. I should be shootin’ you. Marv says so.”.... BANG !!!

I'll bet my last dollar that you or I can make it safely through say .... the Chinese sections of just about any city - perhaps even being afforded the civility of asking for directions. How ’bout the ghetto, Marv where the savage lures like a predatory beast void of any civility just waiting /hoping for some action? Intuition tells me that for my own safety I best stay clear of such situations. End of story. No hand picked stat would otherwise convince a sane individual to walk into such a lion’s den. And by the way Marv, I'm not Chinese.

Save your energy. Your efforts here with me and all other like- minded folks, those who simply refuse to allow popular notions cloud their vision, is an exercise in futility. Worse still, you're rant does little more than provide members of your own community this perpetual facade from which blacks deny the reality of their violent nature rather than dealing with it in realistic terms.

Why is it you don't see most other races relying on the same crutches blacks continue to to this very day? Why is it you do you not see oriental, French, Italian, Russian, East Indian, Portuguese and on and on ... equivalents of such mouth pieces as Al Sharpton? Can you imagine a wing nut like that in say ... Japan? Me neither. They don’t need those types to even the score. They simply work hard and show respect for themselves and all others.

Blanket statements? Perhaps. Generally correct? Absolutely.

Cont'

My Lord, how I used to loath conservative types like Mark Levin, just hate their right wing agenda and rantings on the radio. In fact I walked out of university fully left of centre and quite proudly the bleeding heart liberal type only to have that humanitarian characger exploited in every which way and simply taken for granted by blacks. I've seen a high jacking of the left for politiccally correct ideology whereby my interest had always been on the economic issues and the evening out of wealth.

I am extremely proud of all the achievements of white man (my God that list is endless)but it's close to facism if one dares even mentions it. Yet here I owe as you do almost every advancement which benefits the common man to the white race. Instead I am urged to proport and regularly recongnise a violent and misguided savages race?

I am tired of pretending as if all is wonderful, sick of celebrating the slightest of black acheivments while their savagery is conveniently ignored. NO MORE. For my kids, for my future grandkid "the Emperor has no clothes" (sorry, I like that one). I've had it. We are on a societal suicidal trek. Time to wake up people and get honest no matter how politically incorrect it might be.

So save your carefully selected stats and get over your denial, Marv. You will never sway me or others of my kind. We are not racists, we are realists. Instead why don't you attempt to do something productive not only for your own kind but, in turn, for the entire populous. You know, kind of in the vain of a Bill Cosby. Recall his mention of the black male tendency to make lots of little babies all over the ghetto but not being much of a father in return. How about starting there.

But you know, intuition suggests you'll simply report back offering up the same olf schtick of selected stats with the usual statements that you've doled out thus far.

Marcus

Uhm , Close but Wrong...

The very nature of Statistical data is that it's based on fixed data points, and as I've always said those data points do not translate well io interruptable subject matter. and by saying that you would know that no one claims to be expert on such constanlty shifting data. I have a passing Familiarity with analysizing data and being able to extrapolate the conditionals, hardly the ego trip you accuse me of (can you say transfer complex)

I really have little care it YOU think I am expert at anything, nor should you have any care that I am. My sole purpose is to offer counterpoint, and point , especially the former. I detest people who use data to prove a point and do so in such a manner it abuses the sensibilities and becomes a tool of hatred ,clumsy at best and lacking the respect for the intellect of those reading, who may take it at face value, and lacking reasearch would be acting on partial flawed data.

your obsession with me is fascinating, and I think warrants some attention by you to see just why. I however don;t really care about your comments , just the bad data and fooling of people is my concern, you are but the hapless medium and of little consequence aside from our playful little exchanges, you spouting Vile "ethno-centric" epitaphs and my responding in kind. By the way how can a person NOT be etho-centric whe they spend thier whole lives as a member of one ethnic group? I think you meant Self centered Black Militant Arrogance. It fits more with your perception of Me.(all this talk about you talking about me, my goodness I feel so special)

Marcus wrote:

Well hello Marv-oh. Somehow I knew you’d factor in even though the exchange had shifted to myself and another fellow.

you alone are the grand authority of all things statistical. Let’s get this part straight right away - you are not nor have I ever considered you to posses such authority. This is further understood when one considers the selectively of any data you've sighted here. Therefore, when you offer up statements such as "... close but not quite accurate .." you do little for your cause other than reveal the ethno-centric arrogance from which your point of view hales.

I do not think we need speculate that anyone who has entered an opinion on this blog is in any way “obsessed” with you. That would most definitely include myself. You give yourself too much credit. Perhaps you neglected to notice that you and I (save for an entry by “Jason”) are all that remain on this blog. And my entries are often replied to in duplicate by yourself. So, who’s obsessed with who????

While you’ve once again achieve the comedic element (without intention) with your commentary, the idea that anyone would and/or could find you in anyway an obsession (of course stemming entirely from obvious self indulgence with it's root in insecurity) is synonymous with Adam suggesting that Eve thinks him the best looking guy in Eden. Take some confidence building workshop, pal.

Now, since it is only yourself and I left voicing our opinions and offering up both anecdotal submissions while pointing at statistical data (although as I’ve pointed out that your’s is of a select, politically correct variety) there is no longer any need for me to continue on involving myself in your futility. Therefore, I will sign off this blog for the last time on this particular vein of this subject matter and move on to more rewarding endeavours.

Your entire stance from the moment I joined in on this topic has clearly come from a biased perspective. This is of course why I speculated early on that you are in fact black. Therefore, from the very start you’ve not adhered to any scientific empirical methodology of verstehen which translates to mean that none of your crap represents the overall truth. In fact, I checked up on absolutely none of your sited references since I knew these were selected among the politically correct sources. This type of misrepresentation or propaganda need be confronted. That, my friend, might well be an obsession of mine whether it be you or anyone at the other end of the debate.

Why don’t you (and what I really mean is all like minded people - not necessarily you personally) instead put on a nice suit and take a long walk for an hour or two (if you make it that long) through the jungle area(s) of any major city in the U.S.. Consider Detroit, right across the river from my home town. Hell, bring the wife and kids. I think it’s highly likely that you will become a statistic as opposed to presenting yourself as a qualified statistician one who purports the truth via well rounded data.

Reliance on politically correct thought and policy is a weakness not a strength.

Scott,
While trying to prove you are not something, you just prove that you are. Embrace your racist self. Be happy, you get to feel superior to somebody. Doesn't that make you feel better?

Ah yes, statistics leads you to the truth, while human emotion and anecdotal information leads you nowhere. Maybe fire off these stats to Al Sharpton.

By the term once Again, and how close you pay attention it's obvious your comments to the contrary are not so believable. And a reply is one thing, a tirade directed Toward someone is entirely another thing. Maybe your sense of comedy is flawed. But It seems that the poinr originally was
1. The Extent of Racial incidents By Blacks as opposed to those against blacks. the Historical reference was invoked of Rosewood
2. Rosewood was commented as irrelevant , then not even accurate as it was "BASED ON" events thus the attempt was to make it trivial
3. The Historical evidence about Rosewood was posted , and then challenged as accurate or even true
4. Someone mentioned the movie , I mentioned stories I heard as a boy from old people who were there (or claim to be) and their accounts differ greatly from the movie and other "sources" contradict.
5. Someone came up and decided that THIER point of view and that somehow any account I have is flawed hands down. And there is where the Personal commentary came in MArcus.
And Much like you attempted to make it personal , I maintained 2 things 1. accounts of an incident are usually emotive and are prone to errors so discussion is always preferred, and 2 . Why does the inclusion of Personal attack have to precede any intelligent conversation on this topic?
Now if indeed that is your idea of funny then so be it. Also for the record you did jump in on this Again. with nothing to offer but personal accusatory statements that are well reflected on your actions as well as anyone else.:Glass Houses and Rocks don't mix!
Especially when the Tirade continued to be laden with :I Have this and I am better and look what I can do commentary all the while diverting deeply from the topix at hand. But of course that is how things work, when any comments become too spot on (me or anyone else) send a troll to shake it up. Point is the degree of Ugly and Inhuman treatment aimed at blacks in the last 200 years Has always been somewhat greater than ANY suffered by whites in the same time frame.
Nice try though, I'll give you points for remaining consistently flacid in your commentary.

Political correctness maybe weakness to you, but to some it is a way of extending discussion without inciting visceral reactions, that would be counter productive to the process, which is your real problem. You expect that kind of from the hip angry response and I am so glad to offer you the exact opposite.

Marcus wrote:

I do not think we need speculate that anyone who has entered an opinion on this blog is in any way “obsessed” with you. That would most definitely include myself.

Reliance on politically correct thought and policy is a weakness not a strength.

Please Al Sharpton is hardly relevant.. He tries to make people mad to make a point. When all he needs is those stats.

Chuck wrote:

Ah yes, statistics leads you to the truth, while human emotion and anecdotal information leads you nowhere. Maybe fire off these stats to Al Sharpton.

I believe blacks are less evolutionary and much closer to some type monkey than human. The average IQ in Africa is 70, in America the lighter the skin of the black the higher their IQ.