why can't mccain draw a crowd?

Judged:

1

Lucifer wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey, leave SpongeBob out of this, OK?
LOL

Judged:

1

Jim B wrote:

I am just as offended by your remarks, I have a job and have never been without one, I am not on welfare and I have a family that I TAKE CARE OF. I work hard and long to put money away for my kids education so no one ever has to take care of them but me.
I am sick of taking care of all the bums that are sitting on their butts sucking money from my household too, but that has nothing to do with McCain or Obama.
Obama wants to take care of all the welfare bums and illegals. McCain wants to take care of all the illegals and provide corp welfare to big business. What's the dif?
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

Lucifer wrote:

<quoted text>
Your 10 year old sounds smarter than most posters on 'topix'.
(and so do you)

Judged:

1

BR Bean Counter wrote:

<quoted text>
In his case, that should be Fatwahs.

Judged:

2

1

1

idunno wrote:

<quoted text>
BARRACK was the PRESIDENT of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW surely he's gonna LOOKOUT and RESPECT ALL PEOPLES RIGHTS.
how's that for QUALIFICATIONS

Judged:

1

1

1

fact check wrote:

<quoted text>
What's this talk of raising taxes?
According to factcheck.org :
misleading claims about Obama's tax program, saying it would bring "one of the largest tax increases in American history." But as increases go, Obama's package is hardly a history-maker. It would raise taxes for families with incomes above $250,000. Most people would see a cut.

Jim B wrote:

Fat Whats????
<quoted text>

idunno wrote:

why don't mccain supporters come to his speeches?

Judged:

1

BR Bean Counter wrote:

<quoted text>
Fatwahs:
Muslim Religious Edicts. An interpretation of the text of the Koran that explains to the average Muslim man how to lead his life.
Please note that women don't need to worry about such things, their husband shall tell them what to do.

Judged:

2

1

1

Neko wrote:

<quoted text>
So you prefer the "Zionist" religious "Edicts" of John McCain?
Or the "Corporate christian" religious "edicts" of Pat Robertson?(Notice my use of the little "c" in the word 'christian"....not a typo!!!)
Down to 2 choices for me....Bob Barr and Obama...
Whoever will do their best to defend the CONSTITUTION from ALL enemies.
The GOP by rejecting Ron Paul has made it clear that the US Constitution is nothing but a piece of paper to them!
(Maybe....because it is printed on hemp?)
Any more lies like that from McCain supporters and I will be voting for Obama out of "spite"
Put McCain in the Whitehouse....and America is going to need a lot of body bags to pack the people who put him there!!!
Turning America into a "christian" Theocracy is an act of Capital treason!

Neko wrote:

<quoted text>
So you prefer the "Zionist" religious "Edicts" of John McCain?
Or the "Corporate christian" religious "edicts" of Pat Robertson?(Notice my use of the little "c" in the word 'christian"....not a typo!!!)
Down to 2 choices for me....Bob Barr and Obama...
Whoever will do their best to defend the CONSTITUTION from ALL enemies.
The GOP by rejecting Ron Paul has made it clear that the US Constitution is nothing but a piece of paper to them!
(Maybe....because it is printed on hemp?)
Any more lies like that from McCain supporters and I will be voting for Obama out of "spite"
Put McCain in the Whitehouse....and America is going to need a lot of body bags to pack the people who put him there!!!
Turning America into a "christian" Theocracy is an act of Capital treason!

BR Bean Counter wrote:

<quoted text>
Good Morning Neko
Actually, I don't think Obama is a true Muslim, any more than the editorial staff of Al Jazeera does. They think Barack will continue to advance the illegal occupation just like everyone else has.
So long as I have to listen to the ramblings of a group of mental midgets speaking unsubstantiated garbage about the "right", why not lower myself to their level and make the same absurd type of arguments about the "left".
While I'm not sure if Ron Paul was the answer, wouldn't it be nice to have a political party that wasn't already in the pockets of one group of special interests or the other.
Both Obama's pick of Biden, and McCain's choice of Palin seem to be nothing more than pandering to their respective extremist elements.
Thanks for the interesting reply though.

Judged:

1

1

1

It takes all kinds wrote:

<quoted text>
40,000 today in Wisconsin. Not a crowd?
More viewers on TV than Nobama pulled on the night he descended into the Greek Colosseum. Not sure how you came up with one.

idunno wrote:

why don't mccain supporters come to his speeches?

Judged:

1

1

fact check wrote:

<quoted text>
What's this talk of raising taxes?
According to factcheck.org :
misleading claims about Obama's tax program, saying it would bring "one of the largest tax increases in American history." But as increases go, Obama's package is hardly a history-maker. It would raise taxes for families with incomes above $250,000. Most people would see a cut.

Batch37 Pain Is Good wrote:

<quoted text>We are working.

BR Bean Counter wrote:

<quoted text>
Good Morning Neko
Actually, I don't think Obama is a true Muslim, any more than the editorial staff of Al Jazeera does. They think Barack will continue to advance the illegal occupation just like everyone else has.
So long as I have to listen to the ramblings of a group of mental midgets speaking unsubstantiated garbage about the "right", why not lower myself to their level and make the same absurd type of arguments about the "left".
While I'm not sure if Ron Paul was the answer, wouldn't it be nice to have a political party that wasn't already in the pockets of one group of special interests or the other.
Both Obama's pick of Biden, and McCain's choice of Palin seem to be nothing more than pandering to their respective extremist elements.
Thanks for the interesting reply though.