Your town. Your news. Your take.

Local News: Grand Rapids, MI 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

 
Advertisment
WOOD-TV Grand Rapids and Michigan

Smoking ban tough decision for restaurant owners

Comments (Page 5)

Showing posts 81 - 98 of 98
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
O-Boi

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Apr 16, 2008
 
But what people are not realizing here is that government is getting more and more control over our lives. now its smoking, which seems harmless since its a health risk, but you just wait, more and more of our rights are going to be stricken from us until we are no longer the land of the free. make sure you watch very closely who you vote for and place in office. Ron Paul shoudl be on the republican ballot, he believes in a limited government and the rights and freedoms of individuals. I'm still writting him in.
KJB

Battle Creek, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Apr 16, 2008
 
What is all the talk about make tobacco illegal, it would end the discussion, the state would benefit. The non smokers will gladly make up the revenue lost from tobacco taxes. They will also flock to EVERY business that supports going smoke free, that revenue will also need to be made up. I go out usually 5-6 days per week and spend on avarage about $250-300/week, yes I do smoke and tip the employees.
kris

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Apr 16, 2008
 
Mike wrote:
My wife and I decided some time ago what our solution would be - we simply don't go to restaurants that permit smoking. Does anyone know if there's a website that puts up a list of smoke-free Michigan restaurants?
I agree that its' a free country and that the owners of restaurants should be able to make their decision, without government intervention. I figure that if enough non-smokers quit going to smoke filled places, the owners will get the hint.
Yup. Check out this site for a list of smoke-free restaurants in Michigan.

http://www.smokefreemichigan.org/restaurants....
ARE YOU KIDDING ME

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Apr 16, 2008
 
just plain ol me wrote:
"Why is it that non-smokers feel they have the right to inflict their non-smoking habits in a resturant or any other public place? If you don't want to smell my smoke, stay at home."
I used to smoke. I also found out I have asthma, which was greatly increased by smoking. I can't go to a bar or most restaurants anymore, because I can't breathe if it has smoking in it. I lived in Cali for a couple years and can honestly say that making public places smoke free won't hurt business. I can however say that yes, Michigan in winter isn't a fun place to stand outside in a courtyard to have a smoke. Make an outside covered courtyard with a fire pit in the middle for some heat (maybe a couple windbreak walls, but not a full enclosure?). Maybe there could be a better way to stop smoke from traveling, but in the meantime, the benefits of stopping smoking in public places highly outweighs the slight inconvenience of the few people griping with their holier than thou attitudes about where and when they can smoke. You don't smoke in a grocery store, and you don't complain..why, because it's just always been that way. Why is waiting a little while for that cigarette after dinner or a drink such a huge problem?
I am allowed to go where I want, and shouldn't be forced to "stay home" in order to breathe.
I Don't have a problem waiting for a cigarette after dinner. But, I do enjoy my smokes a little more having cocktails. It should be up to the business owner....after all...they know what their patrons want. There are enough bars/restaurants for non smokers to choose from. Some people don't seem to understand that the more you/we allow the government to come in and take our rights away, the less WE....the taxpayers have. Be careful what you allow the government to do because someday we might be wondering how in the world we'll be able to protect ourselves or our family....without the right to bear arms. Oh and by the way, I remember smoking cigarettes in grocery stores many years ago. The 80's I believe.

“Taz say Hi”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008

Comments: 6208

Holland,MI

ISP: Holland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Apr 16, 2008
 
Zippy wrote:
What would the cost of health insurance be with no obesity. We also pay for all the health risks here too.
<quoted text>
Yes, and the state attorneys general did not sue the fast food companies like they did the tobacco companies. Then, after suing the tobacco companies for "health costs", they spend very little, if any of it on health costs or anti smoking campaigns. Instead, they sold the settlement money to an investor to balance the budget at the last minute. And now, instead of working on a budget and the messed up convoluted mess they created with the business tax, they "work" on everything but straightening out their mess that we end up living with.

“Taz say Hi”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008

Comments: 6208

Holland,MI

ISP: Holland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Apr 16, 2008
 
Health Concerned Person wrote:
Do you smoking people know that they added more nicotine and more harmful additives to cigarettes to make you crave them even more. Do you know how many people are walking around with lung nodules and lung cancer than ever before. Some people just don't know it. But you will, when you are trying to breathe and your lungs just can't do it anymore and you still have the will to live. Don't look at it like someone is trying to tell you what to do. Don't you want to live?
How can it be that more people have health problems due to tobacco smoke when there are less smokers than ever?
Mike

Lansing, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Apr 16, 2008
 
I think bars and restaraunts should have the liberty to decide on their own based on the clientell that frequent their establishment. Government regulation injected into the practices of private business all too often ends up causing discontent and higher prices and added taxes.
Sheri

Bolivar, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Apr 16, 2008
 
"Two anti-smoking groups completed the study." Wow, if the party with the agenda conducts the study, then I guess it will get the results it is seeking. Whenever SmokeFree rolls into a state and pushes its agenda, the studies always say this. However, one might venture a few miles across the state line into Ohio if he is interested in the truth about the effect of the smoking ban on bars. 28,000 violations in Ohio in less than a year since the ban went into effect. 14 counties have opted out of enforcement because of the expense. Every appeal of a fine costs the state $350 for a $100 fine. The anti tobacco foundation in Ohio has sued the state for taking money that belongs to the state...they attempted a covert transfer of $240 million to Washington DC to avoid giving the state's money back to them. If you want to know the truth about smoking bans, look to the people who live under them rather than a group that conducts its own studies. Here's a recent quote from an editorial about the legal case. "Instead, the foundation kept spending money, with some of it going to
a public relations firm even though the foundation has a
communications director... Still, the foundation refuses to respond to questions. And now money
is being spent in court." http://www.cantonrep.com/index . php?
Rider

Cumming, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Apr 17, 2008
 
This is one more case of legislators and others who have NO LIFE of their own find ways to interfere with others'. It should certainly be up to the business owner and the employees to make a choice to work in those establishments. They are not asking for anyone's "protection". Where will it ever end? Some one every day is dreaming up a new way to take away one more of our freedoms. And we are told that the people in this country should "stand united".! These so-called "protectors' need to mind their own business, watch their own backyards.
Jim

Toledo, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Apr 18, 2008
 
To me this is just insanity, we have more problems in this state then smoking or not smoking in public places hell who cares jobs are leaving, health care is a joke big business is squeezing the little out of the state and government want to tell you how to live your life, at last check i was able to make my own decisions. Mr Sikkema do you not have better things to do than kill a tax revenue for the broke treasury of Michigan?
Ryan

Kendall, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#91
Apr 19, 2008
 
Justice wrote:
<quoted text>
Ryan.... I don't want you driving to these smoke free bars/eating establishments. Your car exaust contributes to the pollution in the atmosphere. Why should I have to share the same atmosphere with you you stinking car drivers?
Just an FYI, but cars only account for about 5% of the pollution in the air so me driving my car makes no difference to you. Now your one cigarette can stink up the whole restuarant. Also, I am not saying that you can not smoke. I just don't believe I should have to smoke along with you.

“Taz say Hi”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008

Comments: 6208

Holland,MI

ISP: Holland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#92
Apr 19, 2008
 

Judged:

1

Ryan wrote:
<quoted text>
Just an FYI, but cars only account for about 5% of the pollution in the air so me driving my car makes no difference to you. Now your one cigarette can stink up the whole restuarant. Also, I am not saying that you can not smoke. I just don't believe I should have to smoke along with you.
Then don't patronize the establishment that allows smoking. Nobody is forcing you to go there.
say what

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#93
Apr 19, 2008
 
Gentle Taz wrote:
<quoted text>
Then don't patronize the establishment that allows smoking. Nobody is forcing you to go there.
There's choices on both sides. Smokers don't have to go into a place of business that allows smoking-and many are increasingly deciding to do just that-and smokers don't have to light up while in a public place of business and could choose, instead to do so in private or outside. Unless, of course, their addiction is so strong they can't stand to go an hour wihtout lighting up. It's more considerate to aovid doing something the majority of people find offensive than it is to insist that others avoid you while you engage in offensive behavior. Then again, addicts aren't known for their consideration of others; the many 'I'll smoke if I da** well want to and you just need to get over it' replies are evidence enough of that.
no problem

Hudsonville, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#94
Apr 19, 2008
 
No need to bug them, most smokers will be dead from some smoking related disease soon enough...have another by all means

“Taz say Hi”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008

Comments: 6208

Holland,MI

ISP: Holland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95
Apr 19, 2008
 
say what wrote:
<quoted text>
There's choices on both sides. Smokers don't have to go into a place of business that allows smoking-and many are increasingly deciding to do just that-and smokers don't have to light up while in a public place of business and could choose, instead to do so in private or outside. Unless, of course, their addiction is so strong they can't stand to go an hour wihtout lighting up. It's more considerate to aovid doing something the majority of people find offensive than it is to insist that others avoid you while you engage in offensive behavior. Then again, addicts aren't known for their consideration of others; the many 'I'll smoke if I da** well want to and you just need to get over it' replies are evidence enough of that.
Well, let's see, non smokers want to go every place that smokers do and then complain about the smokers. That doesn't make sense to me at all. Why shouldn't a smoker go into a place that allows smoking? I agree that you shouldn't be so offensive as to try to run my life. I don't walk into a non smoking establishment and light up so you should just stay out of smoking establishments if smoking is so offensive to you.
say what

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#96
Apr 19, 2008
 

Judged:

1

Gentle Taz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, let's see, non smokers want to go every place that smokers do and then complain about the smokers. That doesn't make sense to me at all. Why shouldn't a smoker go into a place that allows smoking? I agree that you shouldn't be so offensive as to try to run my life. I don't walk into a non smoking establishment and light up so you should just stay out of smoking establishments if smoking is so offensive to you.
Smokers want to go everywhere that non-smokers do and pollute the environment with their smoke while making the place smell like an ashtray. I have to breathe everywhere I go, but you don't have to smoke everywhere you go. Smoke all you want in your home, heck...smoke two or three at a time for all I care, but don't pollute my airspace with it and don't force me to share your nasty habit.

“Taz say Hi”

Joined: Jan 6, 2008

Comments: 6208

Holland,MI

ISP: Holland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97
Apr 19, 2008
 

Judged:

1

say what wrote:
<quoted text>
Smokers want to go everywhere that non-smokers do and pollute the environment with their smoke while making the place smell like an ashtray. I have to breathe everywhere I go, but you don't have to smoke everywhere you go. Smoke all you want in your home, heck...smoke two or three at a time for all I care, but don't pollute my airspace with it and don't force me to share your nasty habit.
I don't force you to share my habit. If you go into a smoking establishment, it's your choice, not me forcing you. I reiterate, patronize the smoke free establishments and there will be no problem.
Trish

Grand Rapids, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#98
Apr 20, 2008
 
Gentle Taz wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't force you to share my habit. If you go into a smoking establishment, it's your choice, not me forcing you. I reiterate, patronize the smoke free establishments and there will be no problem.
OR maybe it should be the law to have better ventalation in all restaurants ..so we dont have to go threw it..When we built my house the city made us put regulation smoke detectors in the house and we dont smoke...Just my opinion BETTER VENTALATION then nobody will lose customers and people still have the choice to go to there favorite place and still feel safe..it is there choice to go in the restaurants!!!!
Showing posts 81 - 98 of 98
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent WOOD-TV Grand Rapids and Michigan Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
your favorite meat market in gr 6 min Kevz 30
GM Bailout 6 min Union All Th... 85
Concensus Growing...Let Big 3 Go Bankrupt 8 min Union All Th... 115
Favorite stand up comedien of all time? 11 min steve thomas 58
Obama is a complete disaster so far 11 min DRCARP 204
Child Visitation 13 min TLC1000 67
Sick Deer In My Yard. What Do I Do? 16 min Hanging CHAD 47
Related Topix Forums: Grand Rapids, MI, Restaurant Management, Restaurant Management