Why risk calling a call girl?

Who writes this stuff? I think I got it the first time that Carol Conklin is a sex and relationship coach.

the exicitment of getting caught?
the spouse doesn't preform certain acts?
the could be closet freaks
all of the above

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. From such people turn away!" (2Timothy, 3: 1-5)

If these politcians what to be smacked around I'll do it for nothing.

Why call girls? How many cute women have just been hired by TV stations? Life is a system of polarities. Sex is the biggest one ever. Prostitution is certainly a consent system. It should be legalized. I will bet that violence against women would go down. Spitzer is a special case as his crusades against others probably led to a set up. There were cheers in NYC when he crashed.

Man With No Name wrote:

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. From such people turn away!" (2Timothy, 3: 1-5)

You need to drink more, or not at all.

arminius wrote:

<quoted text>You need to drink more, or not at all.

Why, so that I might become just like President Bush, with his DWI conviction and his wife threatening to leave him over his drinking???

You might be better of reading your Bible.

Man With No Name wrote:

<quoted text>
Why, so that I might become just like President Bush, with his DWI conviction and his wife threatening to leave him over his drinking???

Maybe if you sober up or just pass out you will stop posting your fairy tale biblical gibberish.

arminius wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe if you sober up or just pass out you will stop posting your fairy tale biblical gibberish.

I am completely sober, not that it is any of your business, and everything in the Holy Bible is the word of God (absolute truth).

Shaggs wrote:

Sounds like your a weak minded person and what you wrote is what would happen to you.
PS. I bang your wife

I wonder which politicians are banging you and your wife, and which police officers are transporting and protecting the wh@res?

*sigh* I love call girls

Being a woman, I completely agree that prostitution should be legalized. No, I am not a prostitute (sorry don't have the body for it!) They are performing a service, and apparently they are doing very well, otherwise they wouldn't be around this long. Furthermore, by legalizing the profession, it would cut back on transmission of STDs, and the sex slave trade (or what ever they are calling it.) The women, and man in the profession, would be entitled to health care benefits as well.

AS for this B S about sex addicts - it may not be a NEED, but let's face it, some people have a higher sex drive than others. IT IS NOT A MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ILLNESS or an ADDICTION!(MORONS) Some people just like it more than others.

Plus with the internet, people have access to all sorts of fantasy and role play ideas. It was around 20 years ago, but no one talked about it. Now anyone can get online and expose themselves to whatever they choose. Its not scientific, its common sense.

Maybe if some of these people got their head out of their books and see how society has changed, they would realize the laws need to change with it.

I think it all boils down to selfishness with anyone who is married to cheat with a call girl or anyone for that matter. We are talking huge egos here! If they are bored with what they have at home try being creative and open with their spouse about it. They would probably discover that their spouse would like a little "spark" put back in too. However, since their egos are soooo huge they wouldn't be able to handle hearing that from their spouse. Hearing "you aren't all that either" just isn't an option for these people. Hense why they "pay to play" so they can be lied to.
to the person who commented "we need to change with the times" : if something is wrong it's wrong.if you have to hide it...it's wrong. leagalizing it is not the answer. if a man or a woman wants to have multiple sex partners then don't get married.Simple as that.if the only way he/she will have sex with you is if you pay for it...doesn't that kind of ruin the mood? jm2cents

I don't agree with this "addicted to sex" thing. I don't believe that there is such a thing, other than an excuse for being horny!
People who get caught, usually high profile people, are the only ones who claim this "addiction". Everyone else is just horny, and made a stupid mistake by straying from their spouse.
In the case of a single person, who pays for sex, he/she is just fulfilling a desire; a carnal desire with no strings attached. What is wrong with that?

I have to admit I have been a sex addict over the years but my wife understood me and this problem-its a desease and I am trying to fight it and keep sanity around my home. Call girls are dangerous so I try NOT to use them

you can find sex with "no strings attached" without paying. I suppose in some freaky way "they" feel impowered to be paying?! Maybe a control thing. The realization that this other person is only "fulfilling" your needs because your paying them to could be a ontrol thing. However, one would think that in itself would be a turn off because how do you keep the thought of"this person wouldn't give me the time of day, and/or he/she is only doing this..etc" because I'm paying them. In otherwords how does one fool themselves into not knowing the other is lying and acting the entire time? Low self esteem that they can not find someone without paying or a control issue?? hmmm. Both sexes have people who just want sex without strings so why can't they get together without paying for it?

my two cents wrote:

you can find sex with "no strings attached" without paying. I suppose in some freaky way "they" feel impowered to be paying?! Maybe a control thing. The realization that this other person is only "fulfilling" your needs because your paying them to could be a ontrol thing. However, one would think that in itself would be a turn off because how do you keep the thought of"this person wouldn't give me the time of day, and/or he/she is only doing this..etc" because I'm paying them. In otherwords how does one fool themselves into not knowing the other is lying and acting the entire time? Low self esteem that they can not find someone without paying or a control issue?? hmmm. Both sexes have people who just want sex without strings so why can't they get together without paying for it?

From my experience..men want oral and anal sex and most or many women don't want to do that...so we have Prostitution!

Sex for sale gets a bad rap, mostly from women who own and control their man, or just want to point fingers because they fee so bad about themselves.
Not all the clients are married, maybe they are addicted to work and don't have time for an actual relationship. Some don't get satisfaction at home for illness or other reasons. It's the oldest profession for a reason, it has basically ignored attempts to wipe it out for millenia. The only effect the law has ever had on it is to make the money non taxable, feed crimminal organizations and make sure that it is disease ridden.

Well, I would not be so cavalier about how this is. It is against the law and look what happened to Spitzer {yes, I did vote for him}. He got involved in a dangerous game and it cost him his career. I just hope all those people realize that not only can you get arrested, you can also be exposed to STD's. This is a dangerous, life threatening risk not only to the people originally involved, but anybody else who they are in intimate terms with afterwards.