McCain is coming to Buffalo

Jim in KT wrote:

As this political season has evolved, I have been increasingly puzzled by the meteoric rise of Barack Obama. I find myself wondering: why exactly? Is there some great accomplishment in his unexceptional political life story that would set him apart from any number of his peers in the Senate or House? Apart from his gifts as an orator, and huge political ambition, what has he actually done that would so set him apart for greatness?
As far as I can see, his most compelling qualification is that he is not George Bush. Obama was in the right place at the right time, and was astute and daring enough to recognize and seize a unique political opportunity: pass go, collect $200, advance 12 spaces. He has a timely and catchy mantra, and is the poster child for political correctness — criticize him at your peril, and check your First Amendment rights at the door.
He is handsome, charming and pleasantly pliant. He is a chimera, a mirror, a sort of political Mr. Potato Head onto which well-intentioned believers can attach and rearrange various virtues and accomplishments without regard to actual reality. And most importantly, he is not Bush.
To all those who are so ready to attend his coronation, I would remind them of the childhood story of the emperor’s new clothes, and would suggest that perhaps they might step back, take a breath and have another look.
The liberal media never compare the foreign experience of John McCain and Barack Obama. They are too busy generating fear over vice presidential hopeful Sarah Palin’s inexperience.
Even if Obama were experienced, I would prefer an inexperienced Palin as president. The reason is simple: I believe Palin would uphold and support the economic and political principles and values that made this country the envy of the world; Obama would not.
Palin doesn’t see the United States as an evil presence in the world; Obama does. Palin would not go to other countries and speak ill of America; Obama did. Palin would not side with foreign powers against the United States; Obama would. Palin wouldn’t surrender U. S. sovereignty to the United Nations; Obama would. Palin doesn’t view Americans as racist capitalists who rape and steal the resources of other countries for their own selfish ends; Obama does. Palin is not supported by haters of America, such as Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan; Obama is. Palin will not put the interests of other countries before the United States; Obama would.
Despite her inexperience, Palin will be guided by her principles and loyalty to her country. Obama can’t make that claim.
A liberal socialist with a Muslim name? Who would have thought that this country would sink this low and people would be this stupid?

Jim in KT wrote:

That dumb prick t-**** doesn't see to understand that his liberal gang also ran up the national debt, but he's a fool and in complete denial of the facts.
The Magic Negro can **** on bread and feed the masses. That's what he thinks.
Obama a free pass, while attempting to discredit and mock Sarah Palin. The Associated Press reported Obama recently celebrated his 16th wedding anniversary. While on the campaign trail, Obama had stated it was his 15th anniversary. The AP had the audacity to report that it was understandable in that he and his wife had spent most of the last year apart.
Also, while on the campaign trail, Obama referred to the fact that he has visited 57 states. One could only imagine what the liberal media would have done to Palin if she couldn’t recall how many years she has been married or how many states there are. Instead of constantly ripping Palin, maybe it’s time the liberal media started to examine Obama’s connections to former Weather Underground member Bill Ayers, his connections with Tony Rezko
Right, racism IS 95% of blasck voting for aman just bacsue he's black.
Wlla Street melt down. Why? Due to liberal orgnaizatiosn forcingvansk to give sub prime slaos to blascka nd Hispancis that now can't back their bills and NOW, YOU ahv to oay.
You liberals just don't get it. Bush tired to get legislation in 2005 and 2006 to stop this whole mess, but liberals like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd and Charles Schumer stopped it an the bill didn't pass.
You liberals are in complete DENIAL about who is responsible for this mess.
Whitey now has to pay up and suffer. So what else is new?
Socialism doesn't work, FOOL!

Jim in KT wrote:

As this political season has evolved, I have been increasingly puzzled by the meteoric rise of Barack Obama. I find myself wondering: why exactly? Is there some great accomplishment in his unexceptional political life story that would set him apart from any number of his peers in the Senate or House? Apart from his gifts as an orator, and huge political ambition, what has he actually done that would so set him apart for greatness?
As far as I can see, his most compelling qualification is that he is not George Bush. Obama was in the right place at the right time, and was astute and daring enough to recognize and seize a unique political opportunity: pass go, collect $200, advance 12 spaces. He has a timely and catchy mantra, and is the poster child for political correctness — criticize him at your peril, and check your First Amendment rights at the door.
He is handsome, charming and pleasantly pliant. He is a chimera, a mirror, a sort of political Mr. Potato Head onto which well-intentioned believers can attach and rearrange various virtues and accomplishments without regard to actual reality. And most importantly, he is not Bush.
To all those who are so ready to attend his coronation, I would remind them of the childhood story of the emperor’s new clothes, and would suggest that perhaps they might step back, take a breath and have another look.
The liberal media never compare the foreign experience of John McCain and Barack Obama. They are too busy generating fear over vice presidential hopeful Sarah Palin’s inexperience.
Even if Obama were experienced, I would prefer an inexperienced Palin as president. The reason is simple: I believe Palin would uphold and support the economic and political principles and values that made this country the envy of the world; Obama would not.
Palin doesn’t see the United States as an evil presence in the world; Obama does. Palin would not go to other countries and speak ill of America; Obama did. Palin would not side with foreign powers against the United States; Obama would. Palin wouldn’t surrender U. S. sovereignty to the United Nations; Obama would. Palin doesn’t view Americans as racist capitalists who rape and steal the resources of other countries for their own selfish ends; Obama does. Palin is not supported by haters of America, such as Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan; Obama is. Palin will not put the interests of other countries before the United States; Obama would.
Despite her inexperience, Palin will be guided by her principles and loyalty to her country. Obama can’t make that claim.
A liberal socialist with a Muslim name? Who would have thought that this country would sink this low and people would be this stupid?

Andre Longprong wrote:

<quoted text>
My first time on this forum.
Is this guy serious? Or is he drunk?

Andre Longprong wrote:

<quoted text>
My first time on this forum.
Is this guy serious? Or is he drunk?

Jim wrote:

A MUST READ. STUPID OBAMA AND HIS LIBERAL CHUMPS ON RUSSIA'S FEELINGS. AHHHH! WOO WOO WOO FELLLINGS... LOL
More speding and weak on national defense.
We have also got to provide them with financial and concrete assistance to help them rebuild their economies. Obama referred to Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Georgia.
It was a brush-off answer. Obama should have known that we give Poland hundreds of millions in military aid. How, in the midst of a market crash and declining revenues, is the United States going to give it more?
Lastly, Poland’s economy right now is much stronger than ours. Poland is forecasting growth in 2009, and planning to reduce its national debt.
Behind Obama’s evasions may lie a more perplexing attitude. One of Obama’s key foreign policy advisers suggested that Obama may want to pull back from the Bush administration’s plans to install part of a missile defense system in Poland.
Michael McFaul, a Stanford University Russian affairs adviser to Obama, said the United States has to consider Russian feelings.
**A lot of foreign policy is about signals. Is Obama telegraphing a willingness to play footsie with Russia at a time it is deploying bombers and warships to Venezuela in a program of courtesy visits?
Nearly 60 years ago, a stupid signal sent by the Truman administration helped trigger North Korea’s invasion of South Korea. It cost 55,000 American lives to push the North Koreans back across their border.
We must never, in statement, treaty, declaration or any other manner, recognize Soviet domination of Eastern Europe as permanent. We must never.
Kennedy was a Democrat, too. Perhaps of a different kind. It is too bad Obama doesn’t reflect JFK’s understanding of history and our special bond with Eastern Europe.
RUSSIA'S FELLINGS! Oh my GOD!

jim wrote:

So how long did it take Bill Clinton to catch Erc Rudoplh, the Olympic bomber when he was right here in the USA? How about Ted Kasinky-the Unabomber who was right in the USA.
The economy. How was in the 110th liberal Democrat Congress for the past two years and has done NOTHING.
How's thar Iraq war stopping going in Congress. They lied to you fools. LIED!
War spending bills were passed with big fat liberal pork attached. What can we do? Deffund our troops?
This housing crisis was cauaed by liberal Democrats forcing banks to give loan to people (MINORITIES) that could not afford to pay back their loan/mortages.
What is it about this that you left wing liberal jerks can't comprehend? What?
Who was in charge on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (Democrat Barney Frank)and said everything was fine and that no bill coud pass to reign in the upcoming disaster. Liberal Democrats, that's who.
You liberals are blind, deaf and dumbThe News portrays Joe Biden’s debate as all-knowing, while giving him a complete pass on his numerous errors, if not lies. For example, he cited the wrong Article of the Constitution as defining the role of the vice president and he falsely claimed that the United States and France had kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon. He also falsely denied that Barack Obama had pledged to unconditionally meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran even though Biden himself had criticized Obama’s pledge at the time.
The News has already ignored perhaps the most revealing lack of knowledge. In the first debate, Obama tried to invoke the memory of a particular dead U. S. soldier. Obama did not even know the name of that soldier; instead, Obama had to look down and read the name of the soldier off the bracelet that he claims to wear in memory and honor of that soldier. To some, that particular lack of knowledge sums up everything we already knew about the man who wants to be our next commander in chief.
At the time of his departure, Stanley O’Neal of Merrill Lynch received a package valued at $161 million after $8 billion in losses; Charles Prince of Citigroup,$100 million; "Franklin Raines of Fannie Mae, Obama's goo buddie',$240 million; Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide,$56 million, and the list goes on.
Go ask Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who ran the senate banking commitee and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae..

Jim wrote:

A MUST READ. STUPID OBAMA AND HIS LIBERAL CHUMPS ON RUSSIA'S FEELINGS. AHHHH! WOO WOO WOO FELLLINGS... LOL
More speding and weak on national defense.
We have also got to provide them with financial and concrete assistance to help them rebuild their economies. Obama referred to Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Georgia.
It was a brush-off answer. Obama should have known that we give Poland hundreds of millions in military aid. How, in the midst of a market crash and declining revenues, is the United States going to give it more?
Lastly, Poland’s economy right now is much stronger than ours. Poland is forecasting growth in 2009, and planning to reduce its national debt.
Behind Obama’s evasions may lie a more perplexing attitude. One of Obama’s key foreign policy advisers suggested that Obama may want to pull back from the Bush administration’s plans to install part of a missile defense system in Poland.
Michael McFaul, a Stanford University Russian affairs adviser to Obama, said the United States has to consider Russian feelings.
**A lot of foreign policy is about signals. Is Obama telegraphing a willingness to play footsie with Russia at a time it is deploying bombers and warships to Venezuela in a program of courtesy visits?
Nearly 60 years ago, a stupid signal sent by the Truman administration helped trigger North Korea’s invasion of South Korea. It cost 55,000 American lives to push the North Koreans back across their border.
We must never, in statement, treaty, declaration or any other manner, recognize Soviet domination of Eastern Europe as permanent. We must never.
Kennedy was a Democrat, too. Perhaps of a different kind. It is too bad Obama doesn’t reflect JFK’s understanding of history and our special bond with Eastern Europe.
RUSSIA'S FELLINGS! Oh my GOD!

jim wrote:

So how long did it take Bill Clinton to catch Erc Rudoplh, the Olympic bomber when he was right here in the USA? How about Ted Kasinky-the Unabomber who was right in the USA.
The economy. How was in the 110th liberal Democrat Congress for the past two years and has done NOTHING.
How's thar Iraq war stopping going in Congress. They lied to you fools. LIED!
War spending bills were passed with big fat liberal pork attached. What can we do? Deffund our troops?
This housing crisis was cauaed by liberal Democrats forcing banks to give loan to people (MINORITIES) that could not afford to pay back their loan/mortages.
What is it about this that you left wing liberal jerks can't comprehend? What?
Who was in charge on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (Democrat Barney Frank)and said everything was fine and that no bill coud pass to reign in the upcoming disaster. Liberal Democrats, that's who.
You liberals are blind, deaf and dumbThe News portrays Joe Biden’s debate as all-knowing, while giving him a complete pass on his numerous errors, if not lies. For example, he cited the wrong Article of the Constitution as defining the role of the vice president and he falsely claimed that the United States and France had kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon. He also falsely denied that Barack Obama had pledged to unconditionally meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran even though Biden himself had criticized Obama’s pledge at the time.
The News has already ignored perhaps the most revealing lack of knowledge. In the first debate, Obama tried to invoke the memory of a particular dead U. S. soldier. Obama did not even know the name of that soldier; instead, Obama had to look down and read the name of the soldier off the bracelet that he claims to wear in memory and honor of that soldier. To some, that particular lack of knowledge sums up everything we already knew about the man who wants to be our next commander in chief.
At the time of his departure, Stanley O’Neal of Merrill Lynch received a package valued at $161 million after $8 billion in losses; Charles Prince of Citigroup,$100 million; "Franklin Raines of Fannie Mae, Obama's goo buddie',$240 million; Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide,$56 million, and the list goes on.
Go ask Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who ran the senate banking commitee and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae..

Jim wrote:

A MUST READ. STUPID OBAMA AND HIS LIBERAL CHUMPS ON RUSSIA'S FEELINGS. AHHHH! WOO WOO WOO FELLLINGS... LOL
More speding and weak on national defense.
We have also got to provide them with financial and concrete assistance to help them rebuild their economies. Obama referred to Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Georgia.
It was a brush-off answer. Obama should have known that we give Poland hundreds of millions in military aid. How, in the midst of a market crash and declining revenues, is the United States going to give it more?
Lastly, Poland’s economy right now is much stronger than ours. Poland is forecasting growth in 2009, and planning to reduce its national debt.
Behind Obama’s evasions may lie a more perplexing attitude. One of Obama’s key foreign policy advisers suggested that Obama may want to pull back from the Bush administration’s plans to install part of a missile defense system in Poland.
Michael McFaul, a Stanford University Russian affairs adviser to Obama, said the United States has to consider Russian feelings.
**A lot of foreign policy is about signals. Is Obama telegraphing a willingness to play footsie with Russia at a time it is deploying bombers and warships to Venezuela in a program of courtesy visits?
Nearly 60 years ago, a stupid signal sent by the Truman administration helped trigger North Korea’s invasion of South Korea. It cost 55,000 American lives to push the North Koreans back across their border.
We must never, in statement, treaty, declaration or any other manner, recognize Soviet domination of Eastern Europe as permanent. We must never.
Kennedy was a Democrat, too. Perhaps of a different kind. It is too bad Obama doesn’t reflect JFK’s understanding of history and our special bond with Eastern Europe.
RUSSIA'S FELLINGS! Oh my GOD!

Lizabeth Sanford wrote:

<quoted text>
Wear be yuo is tonihgt?
I dun tole yuo git yore white Honkiee **** ovir hear at 8 for to do me up wif thet nise thang
I hopes yuo aint bees doin up sum uthir womins wif thet thgang ef I ketches yuo I bees chopin off thet thang wif my hatshit
Gi yore **** ovir hear rite now

Andre Longprong wrote:

<quoted text>
My first time on this forum.
Is this guy serious? Or is he drunk?

Jim wrote:

Hey fool. The 2006 election.
Democrats took control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate for the first time in a dozen years in the 2006 midterm elections, and President Bush and top Democrats quickly promised to get along despite a rancorous campaign.
Webb's win over Allen gives "Democrats" a 51-49 advantage in the Senate, counting two independents who have said they will caucus with the party.
The DOW JONES went up almost 1,000 points (936) the most since 1933.
As usual, the old fool is WRONG again.
lol
Gas prices have dropped to $3.20 national ave. some states (7)below $3.00 gallon, so I guess that liberal T-**** should thank George Bsuh and John McCain, since he's blames them for the reverse.
The enitre world is in a recession and liberals are blaming McCain and Bush. That's funny. That's also STUPID!
Liberals are ignorant.

Archibald Fudpucker wrote:

<quoted text>
Get som,e new original material.
This is a copy of Doug Turner's column in the Buffalo News. He's a bitter old prick. Sholuld have retired when the Courier folded.
What special bonds with Eastern Europe?
Our language, laws, and customs come from WESTERN Europe.
We let too many Polacks into the US.
Did you know Saddam invaded Kuwait because he got a signal from Bush the Father's administration that the US didn't care if he did it? Look it up.
You really need mental help.

Jim wrote:

A MUST READ. STUPID OBAMA AND HIS LIBERAL CHUMPS ON RUSSIA'S FEELINGS. AHHHH! WOO WOO WOO FELLLINGS... LOL
More speding and weak on national defense.
We have also got to provide them with financial and concrete assistance to help them rebuild their economies. Obama referred to Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Georgia.
It was a brush-off answer. Obama should have known that we give Poland hundreds of millions in military aid. How, in the midst of a market crash and declining revenues, is the United States going to give it more?
Lastly, Poland’s economy right now is much stronger than ours. Poland is forecasting growth in 2009, and planning to reduce its national debt.
Behind Obama’s evasions may lie a more perplexing attitude. One of Obama’s key foreign policy advisers suggested that Obama may want to pull back from the Bush administration’s plans to install part of a missile defense system in Poland.
Michael McFaul, a Stanford University Russian affairs adviser to Obama, said the United States has to consider Russian feelings.
**A lot of foreign policy is about signals. Is Obama telegraphing a willingness to play footsie with Russia at a time it is deploying bombers and warships to Venezuela in a program of courtesy visits?
Nearly 60 years ago, a stupid signal sent by the Truman administration helped trigger North Korea’s invasion of South Korea. It cost 55,000 American lives to push the North Koreans back across their border.
We must never, in statement, treaty, declaration or any other manner, recognize Soviet domination of Eastern Europe as permanent. We must never.
Kennedy was a Democrat, too. Perhaps of a different kind. It is too bad Obama doesn’t reflect JFK’s understanding of history and our special bond with Eastern Europe.
RUSSIA'S FELLINGS! Oh my GOD!