Allentown Chiropractors Charged With Tax Evasion

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>Footing the bill for contraception? Again, since you haven't let this simple fact sink in. CONTRACEPTION IS CHEAPER THAN PREGNANCY AND BIRTH!!! Insurance companies actually SAVE MONEY providing contraception. Premiums are not increased.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
But for the omition and reinsertion of a few words you could be writing about school block grants and the free rein the school districts and PSEA will be jumping on to raise taxes.
Evidently no one read the bill or why would Nancy pelosi have adressed all the senate by saying "we must get this bill passed so we can read it".
To Nancy ,
There was a little girl
Who had a little Curl
Right in the middle of her forehead
And when she was good
She was very very good
And when she was bad
She was horrid

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

Obama Care vote
Democrats 219 yea
34 nay
Republicans 176 nay
It passed 219 yes votes to 210 no votes .
Barely . Shame on the stupidity of our elected honorable house members that voted for such a controversial piece of legislative bull.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
The point being it would force religious institutions to provide abortion and contraception services violating the constitution.
He moves the wording around a little and the insurance companies still have to pay. Still illegal, so as a last resort the religious institutions could cancel health care .Threats are shallow. Just do it .

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>Shame on who? What don't you like about it? The fact that people have to buy their own insurance with the help of subsidies?(GOP plan). That large employers must provide basic insurance? That kids can be covered on their parents insurance up to the age of 26? The closing of the donut hole for seniors saving many of them thousands? The law that keeps insurance companies from dropping your coverage when you get sick? The law that allows people with preexisting conditions to actually buy insurance? Yeah, how controversial. Health insurance availability for all.

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>Again, Nancy Pelosi was not addressing the Senate. She was addressing constituents. And she said this because the bill was changing weekly with amendments. She was basically saying that we won't know what the final bill is until it's passed. Secondly, Pelosi never addressed the Senate, she was speaker of the House of Representatives.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

I didn't read the health care bill , and neither did you. The GOP ?
Next . Every person will have to buy health insurance or be fined .
Pelosi, pass the bill first and then read it. They did and are now sorry . How many pages long is it and why didn't they read it first ?

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess a way out for all religions that are against having to pay for contraception pills would be to cancel all insurance policies.
My Pastor doesn't bring politics to the pulpit . Freedom from religion ? Are you sure you don't mean freedom from govt. intrusion in religion.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
Constituents ? enough democrats to get the health care bill passed so they could read it. It's the law now and a Republican president wouldn't be able to repeal it . They throw these things out from both sides of the hall and ignor what's really wrong with our country. The real unemployment rate ? Overseas jobs that will never come back? No government ,state or Federal makes money . They only have our money and are spending it unwisely.
Would your worker health insurance cover your children til age 26.
Mine wouldn't .

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
Not all health insurance will provide coverage to children til age 26.
Some are exempt, do you know which ones? Doesn't seem right but some are exempt locally.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
Not all health insurance will provide coverage to children til age 26.
Some are exempt, do you know which ones? Doesn't seem right but some are exempt locally.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
Constituents ? enough democrats to get the health care bill passed so they could read it. It's the law now and a Republican president wouldn't be able to repeal it . They throw these things out from both sides of the hall and ignor what's really wrong with our country. The real unemployment rate ? Overseas jobs that will never come back? No government ,state or Federal makes money . They only have our money and are spending it unwisely.
Would your worker health insurance cover your children til age 26.
Mine wouldn't .

FRIENDS wrote:

<quoted text>
All of them are the same! They all have a good promise of some kind to get the votes but when they win they are only out for themselves and their pocket! They are ALL scammers but direct it to look at others so you don't realize that they are the real scammers. They are liars are liars and cheat! And Now they have become insurance agents to make people buy health insurance! Which ALL Insurance are rip offs! You spend a lot to get a little bit. That's the name of the game. And people are satisfied with the little bit of help than to fight for what we deserve. One person can not fight for ALL of us.And the ones with the open mouth gets fed. the ones with closed mouths don't get fed. It's like Homeowners Ins that we buy for to cover our homes. People have found out now that the Thousands that we have been paying for homeowners insurance does not cover everything. Like flooding,sink holes, You have to have specified these things in your policy and pay more. I think if we Insure our homes it should cover any natural disaster, whether it be a sink hole, a flood, a crack that developes in your foundation which happened over time should be covered. So we pay for homeowners and get ripped off. Just like car Insurance you are paying for car insurance never have a claim but one day after all those years you make a small claim and come renewal time they do not want to renew you or they want to increase your premium for the same amount of insurance or less. But you paid them thousands of dollars all those years prior. So makes out here?

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>You still didn't answer what part of the bill they should be ashamed of.

FRIENDS wrote:

<quoted text>
As far as I know it used to cover your children until age 23 IF they were still in school. But I do think it has changed. Because by law before you were still responsible for taking care of your children until the end of the 23rd year. Which allowed the GOVT account for the parents income if they applied for grant and student loans. Unless they married or got pregnant. Then they were legally emancipated. If you have grandchildren living with you and cover them with your insurance now UNLESS you adopt the grandchild! But they will give welfare insurance to that grandchild instead of allowing you to put that child on your insurance. Any thing to keep you in the welfare system.

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>By law your employer provided insurance MUST cover any child living in your house until 26 years old if they're not covered by any other policy.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
All of it for not reading the whole thing. These religious complaints were part of it since the bill passed. What gives ,someone didn't want to touch it til now or didn't read it.
I wont name the institutions that are exempt from medical coverage for children til age 26 but they are there. Probably the largest employer in the Valley.
Insider trading for elected officials to protect us from the same abuseses ? People go to jail for that kind of activity.
Church and religion is a racket . Agreed , so is war and politics.

sofa_king_cool wrote:

<quoted text>By law your employer provided insurance MUST cover any child living in your house until 26 years old if they're not covered by any other policy.

Northampton Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't get the details on how the exemption worked . All I could say was , wait a minute it's the law ? You may know where I'm talking about but don't know if it's state wide ,country,county,municipality etc. The bottom line is , I couldn't find out why the children under 26 weren't covered.

FRIENDS wrote:

<quoted text>
I was speaking of the legality of children now have to be adopted to be covered under your employment healthcare Ins. You just can't have custody in PA to cover your grandchildren or any other children living in your household that you want to cover. And I was speaking of the legality of your children being in College and applying for grants or student loans that they go by the parents income until the child is 23, unless they (female) have gotten pregnant or either (male or female) gets married. but if the child is considered grown at 18 yrs old and can move out how can they go by your income for their college?