Pot and law enforcement

James M Kinder wrote:

<quoted text>
No one. Remember that Measure G made it a priority lower than whale crap. And now you have a bunch of druggies running the County.

The current administration seems to confuse that term 'priority' with the more drastic term 'permission' quite a lot.

It's just another reason that people should not only vote No on B, but yes on the Pot Bloc of candidates.

At least there's some grey area in their grey matter.

need mj wrote:

james kinder one day you live in san diego the next your in la the next your from fresno are you hidding from some one keep your nose in souther cal where you belong flat lander

What scintillating intellect and wit you possess, young man. Clearly, you must be a UC Berkeley Ph.D. candidate, studying the Ptolemaic System. Just FYI, "hiding" is spelled with one "d". Go smoke a few more bongs, and complete the destuction of what is left of your brain, hemphead.

writch wrote:

<quoted text>
Yano, over on the 'Nine Myths' thread, your alter-ego(tist) posted that nobody uses any of the lies I listed.
Here's James doing it again, insinuating that there are multiple (majority) phony card holders.
So, who's convicted? I mean, if it's that rampant, there must be ONE example, right?

....Lowest Priority........Lowest Priority.....Lowest Priority...... That should explain the lack of convictions, no?

Gee, half the week's discussion has BEEN about convictions (all over twenty-five plants).

I want to know about the conviction rate for corrupt cops (particularly our local DEA chief, who's write-up in NarcoNews I posted earlier). I really liked the idea of turning coke and heroin into WalMart furniture to get it over the border (as an idea, that is).

http://narconews.com/Issue53/article3099.html

I mean, if the people who are running the show are playing both sides of the fence, shouldn't you be suspect of not just anything, but EVERYTHING that comes out of their mouths?

I can say that, since it looks like it's approved from higher up, to boot (that's why it will be such a big scandal).

Anyway, I'm off to check out spoofing IP addresses, back later.

writch wrote:

Gee, half the week's discussion has BEEN about convictions (all over twenty-five plants).
I want to know about the conviction rate for corrupt cops (particularly our local DEA chief, who's write-up in NarcoNews I posted earlier). I really liked the idea of turning coke and heroin into WalMart furniture to get it over the border (as an idea, that is).
http://narconews.com/Issue53/article3099.html
I mean, if the people who are running the show are playing both sides of the fence, shouldn't you be suspect of not just anything, but EVERYTHING that comes out of their mouths?
I can say that, since it looks like it's approved from higher up, to boot (that's why it will be such a big scandal).
Anyway, I'm off to check out spoofing IP addresses, back later.

How about the corruption rate for fraudulent "medical marijuana" growers? Oh, I forgot, in your world they are ALL medical. Vote YES on B to end commercial marijuana abuse.

I just got a letter from a man in Montevideo, Uruguay (he was sending pix from their Global Marijuana March). I asked him what the penalty was for smoking marijuana there.

He said it's not illegal to smoke or possess pot there.

It's only illegal to grow and sell it.

I thought that was an interesting enough difference to point out.

**********

Anyway, back on track. If there were fraudulent cards involved in ANY case, I'm sure that would be a front-page news item for weeks in the UDJ.

The penalty for fraud in cards is pretty severe in SB 420. I can't imagine any DA not wanting to use it if it were an option, even Lintwit.

Did I miss those stories?