A reversal for coal plant

the more you study the global warming debate, the more we find out its all exagerations.

al gore movie is a good example

No one biting, troll(s)?

Good!
We don't need coal plants and hydro and nuclear and we need to stop wiring the Environment. If anything, we need to shut down powerplants of all kinds and raise taxes on energy sources, especially gasoline.
Conservation is the key, there's no reason everyone shouldn't be paying 25% of their alloted $50K/annum on energy.
Shut it Down!

wellstonevoter wrote:

Good!
We don't need coal plants and hydro and nuclear and we need to stop wiring the Environment. If anything, we need to shut down powerplants of all kinds and raise taxes on energy sources, especially gasoline.
Conservation is the key, there's no reason everyone shouldn't be paying 25% of their alloted $50K/annum on energy.
Shut it Down!

Your an honest liberal. I don't like it when some on these lefties try to pretend they are for more energy supplies and greater economic prosperity.

You make no bones about. Shut down the economy and shut down all this energy usage. Return to our energy levels and GDP of 1910.

Foolish, but your honesty is appreciated!

Don Shelby wrote:

<quoted text>
Your an honest liberal. I don't like it when some on these lefties try to pretend they are for more energy supplies and greater economic prosperity.
You make no bones about. Shut down the economy and shut down all this energy usage. Return to our energy levels and GDP of 1910.
Foolish, but your honesty is appreciated!

Do you often fall for trolls like this?

Will Media Remember Gore's 1994 Tie-breaking Vote Mandating Ethanol?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/20...

As the international disaster of ethanol begins taking its toll on the planet -- and, maybe more important, as press outlet after press outlet finally begins recognizing it -- will media remember that Vice President Al Gore cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate requiring this oxygenate be added to gasoline?
After all, regardless of recent reports blaming ethanol for world hunger problems, rising food costs, and increased greenhouse gases, it seems highly unlikely green media will want to tie any of these problems to Nobel Laureate Gore.
Yet, as inconveniently reported by States News Service on August 3, 1994 (no link available, emphasis added throughout):
In a move that enraged midwestern senators, Louisiana Democratic Sen. Bennett Johnston tried Wednesday to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from mandating the use of ethanol in reformulated gasoline. The Senate narrowly killed the measure, voting to table it by a margin of 51 to 50. With the vote tied, Vice President Al Gore had to come in and cast the deciding vote.[...]
" This is really a gigantic flim flam to the American public," Johnston said.[...]

breeze wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you often fall for trolls like this?

I love how these liberals run from the facts.
They think they have studied this debate, when in fact all their information comes for the left.

It is fun to watch them explain global warming as if it factual.

Barack Hussein wrote:

<quoted text>
I love how these liberals run from the facts.
They think they have studied this debate, when in fact all their information comes for the left.
It is fun to watch them explain global warming as if it factual.

THE IPCC: ON THE RUN AT LAST (gore-bull warming fanatics can't find support data)

Tuesday, March 25, 2008
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/...

That there is a mismatch between model prediction and 2007 climate reality is again unsurprising. For as IPCC senior scientist Kevin Trenberth noted recently:“... there are no (climate) predictions by IPCC at all. And there never have been”; instead there are only “what if” projections of future climate that correspond to certain emissions scenarios. Trenberth continues,“None of the models used by IPCC is initialized to the observed state and none of the climate states in the models corresponds even remotely to the current observed climate”.