Commenters one can safely ignore

Calling people by their names is namecalling.

Richelle

Richelle wrote:

Why would we point out commentors that we can ignore? Isn't the point of this so that people can post thier opinions on things?? Just because you dont agree with what people say, doesnt mean its not true

ME..oo ooo o oo ooo Pick me, Ignore ME!

Lololololol...
I believe this was started by Andrew ess...Now he is amon...
I gave my opinion on the 1st thread that was started, which was cancelled after I gave my opinion, and this one started 45 minutes later without my opinion and Andrew Ess was not the 1st responder anymore...anon..was.

It is like the child that says "he made me look Mommy"....the child blames another for her bad choice. In the same way that telling others who to "Ignore" can only be determined by not having ignored them!

Neither the child or the grown up child (notice the potential censors are the "Progressive" posters....Leftist children), has grown to realize the inconsistency in their thought/actions.

Feed me.

Kevin (of Hudson, WI)

talus wrote:

EBO

I have made an impact in your life. You remember me forever!

you forgot Master of Clowny aka Randy

Pete Wendell wrote:

Thanks!
Is this the free speech liberal thread?

In liberal land, you can say whatever you want, as long as liberals agree with it. If they don't agree with you, shut up, and stop being a hate monger.

I can't believe that nobody has listed Mary (St. Paul).

Josh V wrote:

I can't believe that nobody has listed Mary (St. Paul).

No doubt!! ha ha ha ha

I would never advocate ignoring anyone....."Know thine Enemy"!(even if they are just Political Enemies)

But if I were to evaluate posters based on consistency, credibility, honesty, upstanding insights, ect. These people would not make my list.

Dianne/Mellers
Sarah
Mary
MankatoMike
Laughing

And all those that pull "snippets", change the context, and ignore the real point of the poster they are attacking...then ask for proof of the assertion they assigned to the poster theyclaim to be responding to.

..........I will stop.

I'm dangerous to ignore. I fester.

telltale sign wrote:

Consistent (and all his other names)
Red Ryder (and all his other names)
Scott Simon
Cybear
Tank Murdoch
Gndydncr
John - St Paul
Knowledge is Power
Back When
Red Foreman
NObs
Chris (of Savage, MN)
Archie Anderson
Anyone using an Anonymous Proxy Server

Please add your response to the quote

Savage Fan

Sen Amy K

Consistent wrote:

I will stop.

Finally -- you quit while you were ahead.

Green Bay Sucks without a doubt - he's been making up quotes and attributing them to me. What's funny is they're are obvious fakes. Once a troll, always a troll, I guess.

Consistent wrote:

I would never advocate ignoring anyone....."Know thine Enemy"!(even if they are just Political Enemies)

I think you coined the pharse "ignore list"....

Consistent wrote:

I would never advocate ignoring anyone....."Know thine Enemy"!(even if they are just Political Enemies)
But if I were to evaluate posters based on consistency, credibility, honesty, upstanding insights, ect. These people would not make my list.
Dianne/Mellers
Sarah
Mary
MankatoMike
Laughing
And all those that pull "snippets", change the context, and ignore the real point of the poster they are attacking...then ask for proof of the assertion they assigned to the poster theyclaim to be responding to.
..........I will stop.

Actually, Mellers seems to have disappeared - she used to be here alot, haven't seen her in weeks.

Platea Aequitas wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you coined the pharse "ignore list"....

He also coined most of the things he accuses others of - namecalling, avoiding questions he doesn't like, quoting out of context or twisting quotes, etc, etc. I've been on his "ignore list" for weeks, so hopefully he won't respond this time either (except to call a name).