mark d wrote:
It seems simple enough...If you can't support the candidate you can't be a delegate...There are enough petty rascists that will look for any reason not to support a person of color, just like there would be some sexist that would do the same for a female. Clinton is supporting Obama, the party is coming together like never before. People are starting to break away from the republicans because they see it is the party of Satan. They rape the poor and middle class, they destroy the environment, they torture, maim and kill, all for the love of money. The "money Christians" are doomed as well. God will judge the pretenders harshly.
Of course, if you don't support Obama you are obviously a racist.
The rest of you lunatic rantings are even more insane.
There are plenty of good reasons for any American to oppose Obama. His SOCIALIST agenda? Trillions of dollars worth of promised new programs with no way to pay for them. His pretend move to the middle after years of extreme leftist (SOCIALIST) actions. His only accomplishment in life is working for a left wing political action grou that's best known for conspiracy to comit voter fraud. They pay people to register 'voters'. They don't even need to be citizens, they don't even need to be alive, and they don't even need to be real people (cartoon characters, fictional characters).
I don't care that Obama is black. I care that he would be a terrible President.
He would be more concerned about buying votes in this country while stealing from those who work for a living and in trying to buy friends overseas while not standing up for the security of the country he would be sworn to defend. In his speeches overseas he said the the security of the United States would not be his top concern. It woud need to be balanced with the wishes of others in this world that might not like use.
Obama would be dangerous. If he is elected we will be less safe from terrorism and our economy will be much worse off. Gas prices will go much higher. Rapidly rising tax raes will punish everyone who gets a pay check, not just 'the rich'.
Did you know that the top 1% of wage earners get 20% of the income? You can argue about fairness and all of that but here is the point. People like Nancy Pulosi, Ted Kennedy, Howard Dean, and every other liberal, want everyone to believe the rich get by without paying there 'fair share'.
Since they mahke 20% of the income that must mean they pay less than 20% of the taxes right?
WRONG. The top 1% of tax payers earn 20% of the income but they pay 40% of the taxes. That sounds like twice there fair share.
Let me say it again. The top 1% of tax payers pay 40$ of the taxes even though they only earn 20% of the income.
The bottom 50% of tax payers only pay about 3% of the taxes even hough they ean considerably more of the income tan that.
These are all from IRS reporting.
Obama doesn't have a plan except to say anything to anybody, promise everything to everybody and hope that if we are just nicer to the terrorists maybe they will leave us alone.
That is not 'Change We Can Believe In.' That is the worst of old style politics (which he learned from the best, the Chicago system) with an extremely dangerous, naive foreign policy. The worst of both. We can't afford Obama.
Judge it!
