Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband

Cranberry Frame wrote:

I winn.

Mrf Yrrbnrc wrote:

<quoted text>
Passing fancy song quote service:
"people living in competition"
"too many "people" have died"
"somebody ought to start a fight, before the "animals" start a war"

Anndde wrote:1. Wikipedia's article on Cold fusion presents it as a "continuing controversy."

Liberals hope that Cold Fusion will rescue us from our oil dependency without the need to drill for oil off our coasts.

Cold Fusion experiments are actually widely discredited.

Cranberry Frame wrote:

<quoted text>
Duhhhh? What that?

Anndee wrote:2. Liberals loathe self-defense,

and Wikipedia's entry on the national self-defense system of the
Strategic Defense Initiative is
seething with bias and outright falsehoods.
Long passages are devoted to irrational criticisms of the programs,

with inexplicable prominence given to criticisms by Hans Bethe, a European-raised scientist who later endorsed John Kerry for president.

The entry even claims that SDI brought "the nuclear standoff with the Soviet Union to its most critical point!"

Judged:

1

1

1

Mrf Yrrbnrc wrote:

<quoted text>
If you have to ask, then I cannot explain it to you.
Thanks

Anndee wrote:3. Wikipedia biographies for conservatives such as Rush Limbaugh and Michelle Malkin are usually saddled with large sections titled “controversies”. These “controversies” are often nothing but quotes or complaints by fringe liberal elements.

However, the Wikipedia page for “Hanoi” Jane Fonda describes her obviously controversial propagandizing for the North Vietnamese government during the Vietnam War as “political activism” rather than “controversy”.

Judged:

1

1

1

Mraf Yrrebnarc wrote:

<quoted text>
Many if not most presidents have mismanaged some aspects of a war at the outset.
I am no cheerleader for Bush, but I do feel compelled to speak out occasionally against the nasty and irrational Bush bashing that permeates cyberspace.

Judged:

1

1

1

Anndee wrote:4. Wikipedia promoted to good status, or GA, its smear entry about Conservapedia, in which Wikipedia claims that Conservapedia "has received much criticism from those who have accused it of factual inaccuracies."

Judged:

1

1

1

Anndee wrote:

<quoted text>
The planning probably happened shortly after the first hit on the towers.
1993
*World Trade Center Bombing, February 26, 1993*: The World Trade Center in New York City was badly damaged when a car bomb planted by Islamic terrorists exploded in an underground garage. The bomb left 6 people dead and 1,000 injured. The men carrying out the attack were followers of Umar Abd al-Rahman, an Egyptian cleric who preached in the New York City area.

Anndee wrote:

Just 10 of 127 examples
The following is a growing list of examples of liberal bias , deceit, silly gossip , and blatant errors on Wikipedia .
1. Wikipedia's article on Cold fusion
presents it as a "continuing controversy." Liberals hope that Cold Fusion will rescue us from our oil

Judged:

1

1

1

McCain McDunce McGramm wrote:

The point you are missing is dubya mismanaged ALL aspects of this voluntary invasion. This invasion has gone on longer then WWI and WWII; where the foe was much larger, much stronger, and much more organized. Those wars were also wars of necessity.

McCain McDunce McGramm wrote:

<quoted text>
The point you are missing is dubya mismanaged ALL aspects of this voluntary invasion. This invasion has gone on longer then WWI and WWII; where the foe was much larger, much stronger, and much more organized. Those wars were also wars of necessity.
In the end, the cost to the taxpayer will be staggering. To give a clue as to why some of the so called "intellectual" Americans are upset, here's some points to ponder.
#1. It was a voluntary, illegal invasion of a sovereign nation that could have been solved on a diplomatic basis.
#2. bush& **** used doctored and cherry picked intelligence with extraordinary nazi grade propaganda to support fraudulent claims.
http://downingstreetmemo.com
http://intelligence.senate.gov/080605/phase2a...
http://intelligence.senate.gov/080605/phase2b...
#3. To sell the war to the public, it was supposed to be a cakewalk, flowing in money, with no cost to the U.S. taxpayer. Even the neocon fringe have called bush an utter, total disaster.
When you get done with those points, here are some more...
200,000+ Iraqi civilians deaths
4,000,000 displaced Iraqi civilians
?,???,???+ wounded Iraqi civilians
175,000 American military families "on hold"
4,000 American sons, fathers, husbands d e a d
37,000+ Americans maimed
We should not forget to ponder these devastated lives.

McCain McDunce McGramm wrote:

<quoted text>
The point you are missing is dubya mismanaged ALL aspects of this voluntary invasion. This invasion has gone on longer then WWI and WWII; where the foe was much larger, much stronger, and much more organized. Those wars were also wars of necessity.
In the end, the cost to the taxpayer will be staggering. To give a clue as to why some of the so called "intellectual" Americans are upset, here's some points to ponder.
#1. It was a voluntary, illegal invasion of a sovereign nation that could have been solved on a diplomatic basis.
#2. bush& **** used doctored and cherry picked intelligence with extraordinary nazi grade propaganda to support fraudulent claims.
http://downingstreetmemo.com
http://intelligence.senate.gov/080605/phase2a...
http://intelligence.senate.gov/080605/phase2b...
#3. To sell the war to the public, it was supposed to be a cakewalk, flowing in money, with no cost to the U.S. taxpayer. Even the neocon fringe have called bush an utter, total disaster.
When you get done with those points, here are some more...
200,000+ Iraqi civilians deaths
4,000,000 displaced Iraqi civilians
?,???,???+ wounded Iraqi civilians
175,000 American military families "on hold"
4,000 American sons, fathers, husbands d e a d
37,000+ Americans maimed
We should not forget to ponder these devastated lives.

Judged:

1

1

tournefort wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Jim, I'm glad you posted in response to my message. I'm sorry for being unclear. I was NOT critcizing YOU. I was commenting on the nasty comments made to you by Donna.
These comments were addressed to her:
"Tell us, oh condescending one, just what you have contributed to "the community at large" that is, in ANY way, useful. Re-reading your posts, I find NOTHING.
And no one elected you "speaker for the forum" or the "community at large"."
I'm sure you have noticed that thus far her only "contributions" to the thread have been to repeatedly call you "liar", a variety of other names and play junior psychiatrist.

Judged:

1

1

brad jenks wrote:

<quoted text>
I've read the replies to you with some amusement. They seem to be claiming your posts make you a liar because you post things like the Prague connection to Mohammed Atta.
Although the link has been 95% disproved, if these people did actual research into that event they'd realize it actually indicts Iraq and Saddam Hussein in using terror as a tool. Let me repeat...Even though the meeting probably DID NOT occur the story proves Saddam Hussein's complicity in terror.
Also the allegation George Bush or Cheney "invented" this link proves those making such accusations know absolutely nothing about the event, nor what they speak.
The truth of the matter is the Czech Intelligence informed our CIA of the meeting April 21, 2001...well before 9/11, but the identity of the visitor (alleged by the Czechs to be Atta Sept 11 2001) was unknown on April 9,2001. But this is where it gets interesting.
The Czechs expelled the Iraqi embassy employee named Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al Ani as a result of this April 9, 2001 meeting on April 24, 2001.
The point I'm making is a meeting did occur between the Iraqi (al Ali) and 'someone' who the Czechs identified as Atta AFTER 9/11. The meeting wasn't "invented" by Bush Cheney or anyone else since it did occur. It just probably wasn't Atta.
The reason the Czechs were watching the Iraqi Embassy is a very interesting piece of history relating to terror, but since most folks ignore history I've decided it is probably not worth sharing...