Breaking: Judge stops deportation proceedings against Danbury f...

voiceoftreason wrote:

Now they are just like us, and can hate just as well as we can!
C'mon, let's have Boughton invite them up for tea in the City Hall lounge, where Elise Marciano and Big "T" hang out!

What a tool, this is not the voiceofreason. It's a name changing tool.

censorfree wrote:

<quoted text>
as long as there are idiots out there spreading misinformation, I will.:)
Stop comparing civil law with criminal law, and I promise I will stop.

Ok! Point taken.

Write your congressman and demand that this imbecile called a judge be impeached. He obviously is either incomptent or corrupt.

vince wrote:

Write your congressman and demand that this imbecile called a judge be impeached. He obviously is either incomptent or corrupt.

The letters and e-mails can't go out fast enough.
Also, keep flooding the I.R.S. with photos, names, and addesses of all "the johns" you observe hiring these people. I go with photos of the rear license plate. It's discreet and non-confrontational.

The funniest thing happened to me yesterday. I was at the bus stop in danbury searching for work and this **** picked me up on his truck. He needed someone to paint his garage. When I got to his house in new milford I asked to use his bathroom and he pointed to the woods. I got so mad that I took the biggest **** in the woods and brought back a turd and put it inside of an old shoe that was in his garage. The fool paid me $200 cash.

I practice random discrimination against illegals whenever I get the chance. Just like they do to us. I hope you do the same.

Abobora wrote:

The funniest thing happened to me yesterday. I was at the bus stop in danbury searching for work and this **** picked me up on his truck. He needed someone to paint his garage. When I got to his house in new milford I asked to use his bathroom and he pointed to the woods. I got so mad that I took the biggest **** in the woods and brought back a turd and put it inside of an old shoe that was in his garage. The fool paid me $200 cash.

Awsome! That great to hear that ****. I have a similar story one of the house's i clean on a weekly basis. The home owner doesn't like me to use her bathroom. So I started taking this tea to lose weight and it gives me the sliders. On her schedule day I noticed she was not home so I took a double dose of the tea and crapped all over her toilet seat. On top of that I drank an entire bottle of Patron she had on her bar. Any other immigrants got funny stories? I would love to hear.

discriminator wrote:

I practice random discrimination against illegals whenever I get the chance. Just like they do to us. I hope you do the same.

Listen here your albino mofo. Discriminate all you want, the hispanic race will wipe you off. The Americas belong to the hispanics.

I am so happy for them, at least now I know that my tax dollars help keep illegal aliens in this town. Its not bad enough that illegal aliens don't pay taxes in the first place, now our judges are helping to keep them here.

I clean houses too, I save all my earwax and put it in the peanut butter jars, extra chunky? Who would notice?

Rico Suave wrote:

I clean houses too, I save all my earwax and put it in the peanut butter jars, extra chunky? Who would notice?

Muy bien!

i hope this judge sleeps well at night as our american troops are dying everyday so the judge can continue to make poor choices.

lets not forget 09/11

shame on you judge.

Im organizing a celebration parade on main street tomorrow at 10:00 am
Let's where our colors tomorrow! We will all meet at the war memorial.

Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law. All subject to fines and imprisonment.

The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens. In the same sense, that a son or daughter of a foreign diplomat born in the United States, is not a citizens.

The rationale that their deportation would cause undue hardship to the anchor babies is a judge making up the law. Nowhere in the immigration law is anything like that remotely proposed. By the same line of argument, one could argue that parents who robbed a bank should not have to give up the money because it would be an undue hardship on their children.

I think this will be a very important case, and should be argued to the Supreme Court. It has ramifications far beyond Danbury and impacts millions of anchor babies born in the United States. I am not so sure why they will immediately get any green card, but note if the millions of anchor baby children are deemed citizens, then under family unification, a one-year old can apply for entry of its parents. In fact, a de facto amnesty.

The impact of illegal immigration, while having these touching personal stories, is an unmitigated disaster for American citizens. Ecologically it means going from a population of 300 million (far too high) to 450 million in about fifty million years. Economically, it will impact the poorest Americans and send states like California into bankruptcy. Politically, it will mean that Los Angeles will probably declare itself independent from the U.S.(as Kosovo), Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.

Those who are championing this open borders decision better be prepared to know what they are heading toward, if decisions like this are finally the law of the land.

On 7/7/06, Mexican American professor Armando Navarro, who has organized many pro-illegal alien rallies, was quoted in the Los Angeles Times as saying, "A new majority is forming. Everything will change. The White House will be within our reach. We might have to change the name to the Brown House."

Paul Streitz
CT Citizens for Immigration Control
ctcic@optonline.net

Paul Streitz
CT Citizens for Immigration Control
ctcic@optonline.net

It is also worth pointing out that is a full-time scam run by illegal immigrants and also others who enter the country legally.

Women coming from the Orient wait till they are seven months pregnant, come here on tourist visas and then drop their anchor babies. Then get into the Aid to Dependent Children, welfare, housing benefits, etc.

Also, the same is done in the border states, especially Texas. Why have a baby in Mexico when Americans can pay the expense, and then the cost of raising and educating it through welfare.

Paul Streitz
CT Citizens for Immigration Control
ctcic@optonline.net

Zacksford wrote:

So lets see if any ILLEGAL or their famiy will have a hardship we dont ****?

No, only if they have a kid who's an honor student.

Say..... how well are *your* kids doing in school??

Paul Streitz wrote:

Without reading the decision, this is a travesty of justice. The two parents are here illegally, those that employ them are violating the law and those that rent to them are violating the law. All subject to fines and imprisonment.

Funny how no one on this forum goes after the employers, isn't it?

Paul Streitz wrote:

The "anchor baby" children are not American citizens simply because of birth in the United States because they are sons of people who are not citizens.

Yeah, they are, actually. You are mistaken. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." -14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Unless... unless... you are making the case that the children are *not* subject to the jurisdiction of the United States??

[...]

Paul Streitz wrote:

Reconquista will be accomplished and California, AZ, NM and TX will become part of Texas.

That's TEJAS to you, pal.

The Supreme Court nedds to clarify the intent of the 14th amendment. If it allows this decision to stand, our congress needs to amend the 14th to stop this abuse and misreading of the law. By the sounds of some of the comments by the hispanics in this thread, I don't think they have the kind of morals that would make them good American citizens.

FILTHY @ **** @

ameritaxpayer wrote:

The Supreme Court nedds to clarify the intent of the 14th amendment. If it allows this decision to stand, our congress needs to amend the 14th to stop this abuse and misreading of the law. By the sounds of some of the comments by the hispanics in this thread, I don't think they have the kind of morals that would make them good American citizens.

In the entire Constitution, this is probably one of a handful of sentences that do not have any wiggle room. The intent could not be more plain: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." They're talking here about real persons, not the corporations that were given personhood by judicial decree.