Convicted Eufaula Drug Dealer Headed To Prison

Throw away the key.

Good. Keep throwing out the trash.

yeah well you know he left someone else in charge!

**** - with a **** family.

Buford Pusser wrote:

Throw away the key.

I'd be curious to know what drugs he was selling before I can issue a ruling on this matter.

Kevin wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd be curious to know what drugs he was selling before I can issue a ruling on this matter.

Whats it matter? They are illegal, so thats exactly what it means.

OSU-number1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Whats it matter? They are illegal, so thats exactly what it means.

the feds give out way to much time for the crime. maybe he deserved it, maybe he didn't. A lot of things are illegal, but that does not mean he should get over 20 years for it. The feds have NO PAROLE, so he will do about 18 years on a 21 year sentence. that sucks

Kill him and be done with it. More than likly he will get out in half the time that he will serve.

OSU-number1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Whats it matter? They are illegal, so thats exactly what it means.

It matters because if he was selling pot, that's a little bit different than selling exstacy, meth, heroin, etc. etc. etc.

Lumping all drugs into one is actually a lot like lumping all sex offenders into one, but I've seen enough vigialanteism on here to feel safe assuming you wont be able to distinguish a difference.

The smartest person in this fourm would be kevin, the rest of you typical OKIE'S.

give me a break wrote:

The feds have NO PAROLE, so he will do about 18 years on a 21 year sentence. that sucks

Might wanna do a little research on this.... 21 years in fed time means 21 years, they don't have the so called "good time" like the state prisons do..... I don't know about the no parole, but maybe so on a drug conviction.

Only reason I know on the 21 years means 21 years is I once knew a guy that got himself in some trouble with the postal service and had to do some federal time. he got 5 years, and he served exactly that.

Kevin wrote:

<quoted text>
It matters because if he was selling pot, that's a little bit different than selling exstacy, meth, heroin, etc. etc. etc.
Lumping all drugs into one is actually a lot like lumping all sex offenders into one, but I've seen enough vigialanteism on here to feel safe assuming you wont be able to distinguish a difference.

Lumping all into one, I fully agree!

I even agree with what you are saying. However.(grin, you knew I was gonna say that) if the law clearly states this drug, or smoke carries this amount of time, then thats just how it is.

I feel sure not all drugs are in the same hat on the price ya pay. I also think that on pot, the amount you have has different pentalies.

Very simple to avoid all this though.. if illegal, just don't do it period.

Yes, I have been in a jail house a couple times. Drag racing on the I75 and many years ago, a DUI, so I am not a mister dudly doright.

Again, twenty years for dealing drugs and five for manslaughter or five for animal abuse.......who writes this ****?

unmotivated31 wrote:

Again, twenty years for dealing drugs and five for manslaughter or five for animal abuse.......who writes this ****?

Our friendly boneheads in OKC! I think what cost this man a stiffer sentence is, is because he was a network. He had quite a few people working under him selling.

I do agree with ya though... get less time for manslaughter

OSU-number1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Our friendly boneheads in OKC! I think what cost this man a stiffer sentence is, is because he was a network. He had quite a few people working under him selling.
I do agree with ya though... get less time for manslaughter

as attested to by the story on another forum where one guy died of a heroin overdose and another is in critical condition, often times dealing drugs = manslaghter

MSDT wrote:

<quoted text>as attested to by the story on another forum where one guy died of a heroin overdose and another is in critical condition, often times dealing drugs = manslaghter

You're correct! About the same as a bartender serving a drunk.

Kevin wrote:

<quoted text>
It matters because if he was selling pot, that's a little bit different than selling exstacy, meth, heroin, etc. etc. etc.
Lumping all drugs into one is actually a lot like lumping all sex offenders into one, but I've seen enough vigialanteism on here to feel safe assuming you wont be able to distinguish a difference.

I don't think you could afford expensive payroll and vacations JUST by selling pot! You have to think of all the lives he probably distroyed by selling drugs, wheather it be pot or the herion, etc.

Bzar wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think you could afford expensive payroll and vacations JUST by selling pot! You have to think of all the lives he probably distroyed by selling drugs, wheather it be pot or the herion, etc.

There's a WILD assumption.

Just to let you know that in fed time you serve like 90% of your time before you are paroled!!!

OSU-number1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Might wanna do a little research on this.... 21 years in fed time means 21 years, they don't have the so called "good time" like the state prisons do..... I don't know about the no parole, but maybe so on a drug conviction.
Only reason I know on the 21 years means 21 years is I once knew a guy that got himself in some trouble with the postal service and had to do some federal time. he got 5 years, and he served exactly that.

Bzar wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't think you could afford expensive payroll and vacations JUST by selling pot! You have to think of all the lives he probably distroyed by selling drugs, wheather it be pot or the herion, etc.

You do realize those ludacrious commercials on what Pot did to them are way out in left field. No one I ever knew blew up their car because they smoked a doobey. I knew more kids that did it sober as a nun.