Local News: Bermuda 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Eureka Times Standard

Prices at the pump hitting budgets hard

Full story: Eureka Times Standard

With gas prices heading toward the $4 mark, North Coast cities, the county and schools are feeling the pinch with larger impacts expected next year.

Read All 49 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of49
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Jackie Gleason

Carson, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
#1
Mar 8, 2008
 
We can thank George W. Bush and his cohorts for the slipping value of the dollar, our unpopular reputation in Europe, which caused the dollar's value to sink and caused lack of interested investors from Europe and elsewhere, for giving his contributors in the oil and gas industries tax cuts in the billions, and an unregulated red carpet to extort the American people of their hard earned bucks at the fuel pump. Where are those hydro-fuel cells he was rambling on about in his State of the Union Speech a few years back along with his planned exploration of Mars? I thought I heard him say Ethanol and Bio-Diesel, so where is it? Ethanol is being made from sugarcane in South America and it is fueling millions of vehicles there. The US jumped on the corn based Ethanol boat, but it has driven food prices up for consumers and the Ethanol made has yet to make it out of the Midwest to California. Dark days for America, dark days indeed.
Mark

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#2
Mar 8, 2008
 
When GW Bush took office, gas prices were about $1.42 a gallon. Now we're headed for $4/gal..."Mission Accomplished!"
Re Think

Aptos, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#3
Mar 8, 2008
 
Its'time for the US to change the culture of big and decadant vehicles.China and India are only going to continue to fuel the high oil prices.

Consider midsize or compact vehicles.Too bad the American big three basically force people into buying full size vehicles.Anything less than full size is basically junk.Some midsize pickups and SUVs on par with the full size would be great.
A Patriot

Concord, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#4
Mar 8, 2008
 
Geee thanks Mr. Bush
voice of treason

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#5
Mar 8, 2008
 
anyone want to blame liberals or potheads for this one? I know who wont chime in on this one....pick-up truck drivin toothless goobers, thats who...
Wake up America

Alameda, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#6
Mar 8, 2008
 
www.prisonplanet.com

read the truth!
charlie

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#7
Mar 8, 2008
 
We as a society have no one to blame but ourselves. The convenience of having our personal vehicles or way of transportation is instilled in us from the day we learn to walk.

We have public transportation, which is often under-used due to the inconvenience of having to wait a little longer, or the need to walk a couple of blocks. If society wanted to change the need on high priced fuel, we first need to change our habits.

We shouldn't be punished for not driving back forth to work every day from our insurance companies and paying higher insurance costs because we drive less. Same as using public transportation, our employers should not punish one for using public transportation to run errands and it takes longer.

Public transportation is inconvenient, but instead of using this as an excuse, provide information to HCOAG on what can be done to make it convenient; then use it when it is provided. Develop more car pools or parking for transit buses to carry employees to work from central points and back at the end of the day.

Instead of driving to the chaaper store for smal grocery items, walk a couple blocks to the small store for small items needed.

It is society and its need for "now" that needs to change our dependency on fuel. As long as "now" is in our thinking, we will always be complaining about about high fuel costs.

“HENCHMAN OF JUSTICE”

Since: Dec 07

McKinleyville

ISP: San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#9
Mar 8, 2008
 
Well, well, well, the old pocket book a little lightweight these days.

Take a look at this link:[http://new.music.yahoo.c om/videos/--2146292]

Click on the small video screen and enlighten yourselves.

Have a great day.

Jeffrey Lytle
McKinleyville - 5th District
Elmer Fudd

Portland, OR

|
Report Abuse
|
#10
Mar 8, 2008
 
I see the same dimmers that comment on the schools closing also are here blaming Bush for jumping up the price of oil. Right on one hand, but wrong on the other hand.Price of oil-gas is way up for the following reasons:

1. World-wide demand is way up with India and China using more,
2. Every time we drop interest rates here to stave off a recession it won't work much longer by the way, we drop the dollar's value on the worldwide currency mkt. and we have to pay more $$ for a barrel of oil,
3.We refused to drill in US fields, such as ANWAR, 15 years ago and now we don't have that oil.A 5% increase in our supply would make a difference, since the price of oil is set at the margin, and a 5% decrease in our imports would make a large difference in world prices.

Besides.if Eureka keeps losing population your prices should go up more with a smaller mkt to service.
TMK

Berkeley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#12
Mar 8, 2008
 
I agree with Charlie. We all continue to pay for this ridiculously priced gas, even when it gets as high as it is. If people weren't so busy trying to keep up with the Joneses, buying bigger SUVs and trucks, having to have the biggest, nicest, most gas guzzling vehicles, we wouldn't be complaining so much. There are plenty of cars and vans that are more than accomodating as far as number of people (or kids) are concerned, so that's no excuse. They just might not be as "cool." Everyone should get off their lazy asses and walk for a change, a little fresh air might do them good...

“HENCHMAN OF JUSTICE”

Since: Dec 07

McKinleyville

ISP: San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#13
Mar 8, 2008
 
Elmer Fudd wrote:
I see the same dimmers that comment on the schools closing also are here blaming Bush for jumping up the price of oil. Right on one hand, but wrong on the other hand.Price of oil-gas is way up for the following reasons:
1. World-wide demand is way up with India and China using more,
2. Every time we drop interest rates here to stave off a recession it won't work much longer by the way, we drop the dollar's value on the worldwide currency mkt. and we have to pay more $$ for a barrel of oil,
3.We refused to drill in US fields, such as ANWAR, 15 years ago and now we don't have that oil.A 5% increase in our supply would make a difference, since the price of oil is set at the margin, and a 5% decrease in our imports would make a large difference in world prices.
Besides.if Eureka keeps losing population your prices should go up more with a smaller mkt to service.
Very well stated points and facts regarding oil consumption.

My personal wants are sustainable resources and energies. All of the money being created for this war on terrorism adds up. A substantial proportion of taxpayer's generated revenues could be going into alternative energy sources. This is our planet's future along with technology and innovation.

Question - In your opinion, why is this country still fixated on oil? Is it because it is easier than change?

Jeffrey Lytle
McKinleyville - 5th District

“HENCHMAN OF JUSTICE”

Since: Dec 07

McKinleyville

ISP: San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#14
Mar 8, 2008
 
TMK wrote:
I agree with Charlie. We all continue to pay for this ridiculously priced gas, even when it gets as high as it is. If people weren't so busy trying to keep up with the Joneses, buying bigger SUVs and trucks, having to have the biggest, nicest, most gas guzzling vehicles, we wouldn't be complaining so much. There are plenty of cars and vans that are more than accomodating as far as number of people (or kids) are concerned, so that's no excuse. They just might not be as "cool." Everyone should get off their lazy asses and walk for a change, a little fresh air might do them good...
Great Points! Lower the demand.

Jeffrey Lytle
McKinleyville - 5th District
Porkchop II

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#15
Mar 8, 2008
 
For an election year, why aren't the candidates kicking **** on the enviros for not allowing to punch holes in Mother Earth's local available resources on U.S. soil? Add a few more refineries. Every time a refinery sneezes, the (temporary) price increases go up & then seems to stays there. The public has short memory on these issues. No politicians seem to have any balls and stand up to the Eco Nazis.
I rest my case...I need to finish here at work so I can afford to drive home.
Mike

Sebastopol, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#16
Mar 8, 2008
 
Thank you to those on the Left with extremist views about energy. You have successfully stymied the drilling for oil in and around the U.S., stymied the building of new oil refineries, and foolishly increased designer fuel by using America's food supply for the production of ethanol.

You continue to allow for the most dirtiest means of electrical production, coal fired power plants and have denied, what France has successfully utilized for years, nuclear power plants.

You have boned headed ideas that have never been perfected and usually end up costing much more to use then it saves.

Take a bow! The ship is sinking and you're going down with it.
Observer

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#17
Mar 8, 2008
 
charlie wrote:
We as a society have no one to blame but ourselves. The convenience of having our personal vehicles or way of transportation is instilled in us from the day we learn to walk.
We have public transportation, which is often under-used due to the inconvenience of having to wait a little longer, or the need to walk a couple of blocks. If society wanted to change the need on high priced fuel, we first need to change our habits.
We shouldn't be punished for not driving back forth to work every day from our insurance companies and paying higher insurance costs because we drive less. Same as using public transportation, our employers should not punish one for using public transportation to run errands and it takes longer.
Public transportation is inconvenient, but instead of using this as an excuse, provide information to HCOAG on what can be done to make it convenient; then use it when it is provided. Develop more car pools or parking for transit buses to carry employees to work from central points and back at the end of the day.
Instead of driving to the chaaper store for smal grocery items, walk a couple blocks to the small store for small items needed.
It is society and its need for "now" that needs to change our dependency on fuel. As long as "now" is in our thinking, we will always be complaining about about high fuel costs.
Charlie you are completely right! All you a--holes that are blaming Bush and everything else better start looking at yourselves! You want lower gas and oil prices? Start living without them a little less! Thats the answer! It's called supply and demand! Ever heard of that before? Haven't any of you a--holes ever taken economics while in school? Do you even know the deffinition of the word? "Economics" Maybe you people need to take a refresher course in it and then will understand what Charlie and I am saying here! Stop the blame game and start conserving!
Downtownbrown

Eureka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#18
Mar 8, 2008
 
What is Arcata's next move??
(#1) Not fix the roads? First cutback? he he he!!
(#2) Implement a new creative tax on business.
Oh yeah. An absolute must.
(#3) Increase their already phony storm-water drainage run off tax.
(#4) And the list goes on and on & on &.....
Renner Sucks

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#19
Mar 8, 2008
 
we really should be thanking renner petroleum for our abnormally high gas prices in this county. what a crook
old hippy

Cypress, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#20
Mar 8, 2008
 
Adjusted for inflation , gas prices were just as high or higher in the 1970's when JIMMY CARTER was president. His solution was to wear sweaters. Mike is correct that we need nuclear power plants. Japan and France have been nuclear sound for decades and China is planning to build hundreds of nuclear plants. Humboldters continue to live in their outdated 1970's nightmare. What's next , a hemp car powered by soy?
jason

San Angelo, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
#21
Mar 8, 2008
 
Elmer Fudd wrote:
3.We refused to drill in US fields, such as ANWAR, 15 years ago and now we don't have that oil.A 5% increase in our supply would make a difference, since the price of oil is set at the margin, and a 5% decrease in our imports would make a large difference in world prices.
We export as much oil as we import. Instead of further drilling why don't we just choke back on our exports?
Do you think that once we start drilling Anwar, that oil will be 'ours'? That oil will enter the world market like all the other domestic oil and, like you alluded, will likely end up in India or China.

Specifically tell us how drilling in Anwar will help Americans and not just oil company shareholders? Do you know of some provisions that state it must stay for domestic use? Even if this was the case, wouldn't a 'california lottery' scam occur whereas the Anwar oil would stay but we would increse exports from other domestic sources for a net zero gain?

Really, prove to us this Anwar hoax isn't just a way for the oil industry to make more money with no direct benefit to the American pocketbook.
Observer

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
#22
Mar 8, 2008
 
Mike wrote:
Thank you to those on the Left with extremist views about energy. You have successfully stymied the drilling for oil in and around the U.S., stymied the building of new oil refineries, and foolishly increased designer fuel by using America's food supply for the production of ethanol.
You continue to allow for the most dirtiest means of electrical production, coal fired power plants and have denied, what France has successfully utilized for years, nuclear power plants.
You have boned headed ideas that have never been perfected and usually end up costing much more to use then it saves.
Take a bow! The ship is sinking and you're going down with it.
I disagree with some of what you said but agree on other points. First, we need to get away from fossil fuels. Thats why we are in this mess! Remember the Exxon Valdez? We have to protect the last vestiges of our wildlife and oceans. Haven' you heard about what is happening with our oceans? Not to mention to the planet as a whole! Now I agree with you on what you were saying about coal power! This should be stopped! But again Nuclear is not the answer! You say nuclear power is clean? You really need to do your homework here! Where do you think all the spent nuclear fuel rods go? Do they somehow magically dissappear? Think about that one long and hard!
Would you like us to alert you when someone adds a comment?
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 20 of49
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Eureka Times Standard Discussions

Search the Eureka Times Standard Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Poll: Should Kids Given Up For Adoption Have Their Ri... 6 min Kitty 9
Local officials await bad news in State of State 47 min Gdog 21
New laws to start today 50 min Gdog 68
The Marina Center or a Trojan horse? 1 hr Gdog 84
State of State draws mixed reviews 1 hr Porkchop 1
No teeth 1 hr Yawn 1
Where did Humboldt County go? 2 hr Wiking 12

Be the talk of the town

Get your topix hats, t-shirts & more!

Shop our store now!

Eureka Conditions

(updated 1 hr ago)

Weather
Fog 48°F
Hi: 58°F
Lo: 46°F
Feels like: 52°F
Visibility: 0 mi

See Tomorrow's Forecast »

Eureka Times Standard Poll

created by: Topix Pollster | May 15, 2008

World News

80,860 votes

How Long Will US Troops Be In Iraq?

Click on an option to vote

  • 1 year
  • 2 years
  • 5 years
  • 10 years
  • 20 years
  • 50 years
  • 100+ years

Create a poll for Eureka Times Standard!