Aurora police probe incident near Planned Parenthood clinic

Just the Facts wrote:

Art, As a man, especially as a man, where do you get the right to judge what decisions are made between a women and her doctor including terminating a fetus? Oh, by the way when was the last time you adopted a unwanted child ?

Godwin_Alert wrote:

Bzzzzt! I'm sorry, "Outa State" has ended the conversation by bringing up Nazis. Thanks to all our contestants for playing I Know What God Thinks, And He Agrees With Me! See you next time!

Maxine wrote:

OoooH someone touched an abortionist's arm. What about abortionists performing abortions on minors without notifying the police regarding child rape?
How about showing what they do at that clinic on TV? We see every thing else on TV from autopsies to brain and sex change surgery. After all all they are only dedicated healers removing lumps of tissue right?

ding wrote:

@Art: though a man certainly has an *opinion*, the final decision remains with the woman, her doctor, her own moral conscious and spiritual guide.
unless you're an advocate of forcing women to give birth against their will.
because that's a whole other argument entirely.

Outa State wrote:

<quoted text>Why do these stupid arguments get repeated ad nauseum? The MAN who contributed half the baby's genetic material certainly DOES have a say in whether the BABY lives or dies. A large percentage of our population - including women - believes abortion is the murder of a baby. Terms like "terminating a fetus" are used only by the pro-abortion crowd in an attempt to dehumanize the baby - like maybe if it was allowed to live full-term, it would develop into a rutabaga or something. Since when should only women be allowed to have an opinion on murder? And the adoption scenario? Gosh, I don't think Hitler should have exterminated all those Jews, but I don't think that obligates me to adopt them, does it?

Anne wrote:

While Zell's newspaper reports on abortion clinics, it failed again to report of yet another attack on a Christian Church in San Francisco the other day.

moquif wrote:

So why isn't this considered terrorism? We have physical violence done to further a religious cause. I guess some kinds of terrorism is acceptable to conservatives.

Maxine wrote:

OoooH someone touched an abortionist's arm.

Emmeline wrote:

Oh, that's a good one. The Pro-Life guy doesn't think anyone in his group would have physically harassed one of the employees. Since these people believe God is on their side, I think they'd do just about anything and consider it divine justice.

Just the Facts wrote:

<quoted text>
The men that contribute to conceiving life DON'T have any legal right to terminate or continue life. but for a couple that choose, especially a single women who chooses to terminate a FETUS (which it is), Don't need any legal crap from people like you who need to stay out of decision making between a doctor and their patients. It's none of your frickin business.

Maybe we wouldn't have so many unwanted children in need of adopted families if you prolifers adopted more.

BTW the pro life/adoption argument has nothing to do with Hitler and his extermination. That's a very STUPID argument