Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Prof Marvel wrote:

You clown.

If you say so dear.

Prof Marvel wrote:

And we can only wonder what you dress up as during the Gay "Pride."

Sorry to disappoint you buttercup, but I've never even worn a pair of assless chaps and only seen the pictures of penis hats in your collection.

Prof Marvel wrote:

You wanted evidence -- you were given videos, photos, signage -- and if you think by merely replying "Massresistence is a hate group!" rebuts all this evidence you're a bigger fool than everyone thinks you are.

MassResistance is an anti-gay hate group dear, you and they are merely in denial of that reality, it's their sine qua non. Everything they put out must be seen through that lens.

Prof Marvel wrote:

Here's a photo of the Framingham High School Gay/Straight Alliance Parade. Not the males holding the sign are all adults -- two cross dressers and two other guys in their 30s and 40s.
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/11b/yo...
Are you saying the photos are frauds -- that they've been Photoshopped? If not, how does your claim MR is a hate group explain these photos?
How does it explain the videos?
How does it explain the media's coverage of the event?

So, I guess you are letting the whole P.U.M.P./Rentboy thing die quietly. Wise move. You're right, it's absolutely shocking that adults would attend a public event put on by the youth of their community. They could be family and friends of the kids, but you and your dirty minded friends can't help but wander off into homoerotic fantasies at every possible opportunity.

Prof Marvel wrote:

How does it explain the homosexual sex manual handed out to kids as young as 14?

AGAIN, they were not handed out at the event, but left on a table where they shouldn't have been. The ONLY copy that you can swear was PICKED UP, was by the mole working for MassResistance, NOBODY else complained.

Prof Marvel wrote:

How does it explain gay activist Adam Flanders's letter in which he confesses he and other adult gay males had sex with boys as young as 14 during meetings of the Gay/Straight Alliance Club meetings (which were held at the home of one of the adults.)
Honestly, you moron, do you think you rebut all this by saying MR is a hate group?

Dear, no other adults were ever charged on the basis of Sunny's allegations and he was charged with and convicted of an act that if he had been a couple of months younger when he did it, wouldn't have been criminal. NONE of his many allegations against the group or those involved in it proved to be true. NONE. You've provided us the spin of an anti-gay hate group which never reported the fact that the investigation cleared everyone BUT the author of the letter. That certainly tells us something about them, the question is, what does that tell YOU about them?

Prof Marvel wrote:

Are you really that impossibly stupid

Of course not dear, but you are, hence your confusion.

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>If you say so dear.

You jackass, I was responding to Rose, not you.

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>MassResistance is an anti-gay hate group dear, you and they are merely in denial of that reality, it's their sine qua non. Everything they put out must be seen through that lens.

Classic LGBT rebuttal: " fill in the name) is a hate group. Everything they say must be seen through that lens."

Evidence ...?

So, I guess you are letting the whole P.U.M.P./Rentboy thing die quietly. Wise move. You're right, it's absolutely shocking that adults would attend a public event put on by the youth of their community. They could be family and friends of the kids, but you and your dirty minded friends can't help but wander off into homoerotic fantasies at every possible opportunity.

Here's the photo again, Rick.

Two of the men are drag queens, the others are in their 30s and 40s. They're holding a sign that reads "Farmingham High School Gay/Straight Alliance."

All that and your rebuttal is "They could be parents of the students"

Admit it, Rick, you're not even trying to give a rational rebuttal, you imbecile.

Prof Marvel wrote:

Actually, there was a passing out of the homosexual manual, you stupid twit.
Here's the evidence:
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/11b/yo...

And here I thought we were being treated again to your fixation over that Little Black Book, you were giving us a whole new MassResistance freak out. Sorry about that. But then again, while it may be a brand new freak out, it has the same answer. The pamphlet, by their own count, a staggering sum total of three copies, one of which was taken home by the "casual photographer" (I guess we can be thankful that this one didn't take off his clothes and run away screaming after taking surreptitious shots of middle schoolers like the last time MassResistance sent someone out with a camera), was made available to those attending, it was not being pressed on people against their will. You and your truly weird friends may not like the information contained in the pamphlet, but there is NO dispute to its accuracy. You and your sick ilk demand that nothing but ignorance be taught to young people and that's one apple cart that deserves to be overturned.

Just checking the Id's locker room.

akpilot wrote:

The problem is, people want to twist the Constitution into whatever suits them today, and that isn't the way things work. The Constitution isn't opinion based, and there is only one way to change its meaning- see Article V.

Tough shit for you that the high court seems to take a some what broader and more flexible view than you do otherwise marrying out of your own race would still be a crime- see REALITY.

Dan wrote:

<quoted text>
And it's no surprise you didn't go to work given you've never had a job.
Next.

Oh I have a job, I have the luxury of working when I want.

Prof Marvel wrote:

And there you have it, Sport's fans.

There you have it guys, Professor Malevolent continues to pretend that his post are witty or interesting or that anyone here actually cares about his incessant babbling.

Prof Marvel wrote:

And there you have it, Sport's fans.

Oh dear, dear, dear, give you the truth and it freaks you out even more. Can you say, "Gay Derangement Syndrome"? Whether or not we approve of the business that Rentboy has set up for itself, or the sex trade in general, it will continue to exist regardless. Those in that business are among the most in need of the kind of accurate information regarding issues of sexual health that the CAA and PUMP can offer. Just because YOU and your silly little friends at MassImpotence don't want to know, is no one's problem but your own

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>And here I thought we were being treated again to your fixation over that Little Black Book, you were giving us a whole new MassResistance freak out. Sorry about that. But then again, while it may be a brand new freak out, it has the same answer. The pamphlet, by their own count, a staggering sum total of three copies, one of which was taken home by the "casual photographer" (I guess we can be thankful that this one didn't take off his clothes and run away screaming after taking surreptitious shots of middle schoolers like the last time MassResistance sent someone out with a camera), was made available to those attending, it was not being pressed on people against their will. You and your truly weird friends may not like the information contained in the pamphlet, but there is NO dispute to its accuracy. You and your sick ilk demand that nothing but ignorance be taught to young people and that's one apple cart that deserves to be overturned.

I confess I didn't read all your gibberish above, and that's because when you started going on about "only three booklets were made available" it occurred to to me your understanding of the law is so pathetic, why waste any additional time on such a moron?

For example, why do you think the amount of booklets actually made available mitigates?

It was kiddie porn, you moron -- one was enough to send them to jail.

Prof Dumbass wrote:

<quoted text>
You jackass, I was responding to Rose, not you.

Earlier you were "tickled pink" and now you're having a hissy fit?

Tell us more about those hundreds of "barely legal" boys you are so vigilantly "monitoring" on line...

Not a minute too soon!

July 17 2034 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Bruno, I see you are you taking a short break from trolling kiddie porn to hurl insults. You aren't fooling anyone you depraved little troll.

LOL ... why you hiding behinde another troll name ELH you queer,you aren't fooling anyone you depraved lettle troll queer.

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I have a job, I have the luxury of working when I want.

Um...I don't think that being an "internet porn monitor" is an actual job.

July 17 2034 wrote:

<quoted text>
I know that Bruno is a pedophile and his nut sack stinks like old cheese.

ELH loves cheesy nut sacks. You are all hung up on kids stuff I see

Prof Marvel wrote:

Admit it, Rick, you're not even trying to give a rational rebuttal

You are expecting a 'rational rebuttal' to your utterly insane rants? Funny.

Maybe it's time for one of your asspuppets to chime in and agree with you. What ever happened to that bat shit crazy
hermaphrodite with the three nipples?

akpilot wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you know that you are a shit head?

Aww come on ... was that nice ?????? Now I know why people say the things they do about you creep ... LMAO

Prof Marvel wrote:

Classic LGBT rebuttal: " fill in the name) is a hate group. Everything they say must be seen through that lens."
Evidence ...?

Let's see, for one, it's one of a very few groups which has been on the SPLC's watch list of anti-gay hate groups since they first started tracking such groups. Then there is its sole reason for existence, opposing not only LGBT rights at every opportunity but any recognition of us as human beings as well. They do NOTHING else.

Prof Marvel wrote:

Here's the photo again, Rick.
Two of the men are drag queens, the others are in their 30s and 40s. They're holding a sign that reads "Farmingham High School Gay/Straight Alliance."
All that and your rebuttal is "They could be parents of the students"
Admit it, Rick, you're not even trying to give a rational rebuttal, you imbecile.

Considering the only argument that I was given was that you claim that they must be perverts, there was precious little to rebut to begin with. Your obvious problem with the men in that picture are not their problem dear, they're yours and yours alone.

Bruno wrote:

<quoted text>
ELH loves cheesy nut sacks.

I would normally recommend that you get a cream for your taint cheese but it's probably safer for all the 11 year old girls in your neighborhood if they can smell you and your cheesy balls coming so they can run and find a grown up.

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Can a man marry a woman? Yes.
Can a woman marry a woman? No.
Yes != No.

You dumbass, Yes women can marry women, Ask the other rose, what's youR stupid point???? STFU Go blow AKP