Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

RomneyCare first wrote:

Republicans said that they’ll try hard to repeal the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" starting with a July 11, 2012 repeal vote in the House of Representatives.
In other words they will continue the irresponsible, party first-country last temper tantrum that they have been throwing since Barak Obama was elected president.
What a sad sight this is as the nations needs burn while the Republican Nero's fiddle away and stomp their feet.
What a waste of taxpayer money and federal government time and effort this idiotic vote is.
What a collection of pathetic sore losers the contemporary Republican Party is.

ObamaCare would not got as far as it did if the truth was told from the start. The great obama was selling it as NOT a tax, that it would pay for itself, Now to get it passed by the Supreme Court, it's a TAX. And it will be a TAX for the middle class. Roberts wrote that the law "makes going without insurance just another thing the government taxes, like buying gasoline or earning an income." Only reason it passed. This is a tax where you must pay if you don't purchase. It's a tax on a product you must buy just because you are breathing. And you will continue to pay for free health care after this pile of doo-doo goes into effect. There are still several million people excused. You will have to pay more in taxes to pay for increased numbers on Medicaid. You will have to pay more in taxes to subsidize premiums for all those people who don't have insurance now because they can't afford. Where do you think they are going to get the money to pay for it in 2014? You my friend...YOU and me.

RomneyCare first wrote:

Next the twerp posting from Las Vegas will be asking US to send water to them?
Suck it up, get all the water you want from that idiot calling himself, Mitt Romney.

Where does your LA water come from? Limit your usage, al gore is watching you shower. You are draining beautiful mountain lakes.

Lalala wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course a homosexual judge would declare it unconstitutional, LOL. Especially when the law is all ready equal ANYONE CAN MARRY SOMEONE OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER.

Funny,then explain the higher court also upholding it! His being gay had nothing to do with it! Read the summery and you can plainly see that it was indeed on Constitutional grounds! Equal treatment under the law! Gays had the right and it was voted away and we don't vote on Constructional given rights in this country! Prop 8 was and is simply Unconstitutional period!

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you think that trans genders are homosexuals?
Why do you think that cross dressers are homosexuals?
Why should transgender people not be allowed to adopt a child.
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
I am Irish, my father was Irish. On St Paddy's day and a few other occasions he wore a skirt,( Kilt) He was a great dad. The fact that he wore a skirt on occasions did not make him any less a dad, or a man. In fact if he where alive ( He would be 90) I bet he could kick your ass. He was not a cross dresser, yet he did
have a nice green and black plaid skirt. Nothing flashy, knee high length.
Say next years St Paddy's day parade if you see a guy in a kilt, why don't you call him a queer. Let me know how long you where knocked the fuck out for. I bet 2 or 3 minuites at least.

"...Why should transgender people not be allowed to adopt a child.
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals....

And there you haven't, folks -- they call it "equality."

And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.

Well, let's see by a show of hands how many of you straight morons who support same sex marriage are all for allowing cross-dressers to adopt.

C'mon, now -- show Clyde you got his back.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
And there you haven't, folks -- they call it "equality."
And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.
Well, let's see by a show of hands how many of you straight morons who support same sex marriage are all for allowing cross-dressers to adopt.
C'mon, now -- show Clyde you got his back.

Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?

Yoga wrote:

A 39-year-old Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy was arrested early Friday June 29, 2012 police said he was found in a parked car with a 15-year-old girl at 2 a.m. in San Fernando, California.

The Professor will be OK with that. Its a man and a girl, you know the way god intended it. Never mind that the girl was 15, if she old enough to bleed shes old enough to breed, Aint that right Professor?

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

P.S., I am very much happy to see that the FBI has not arrested you.

I was so scared that I was quaking in my Manolo Blahnik's.

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Good think the higher ups don't see the shi+ you post on here cause they'd fire your a$$. You're an IDIOT, a stupid idiot. Probably a Queer idiot. LMFAO

The "higher ups"? Funny. You don't know much about me do you candyazz?

If you did then you would know that I almost always post here from WORK. BTW my coworkers agree on my assessment that Professor/Doctor spam-a-lot is a raging closed queen and that YOU are either a home schooled twelve year old boy or a VERY insecure sissy man. Funny right?

NoQ wrote:

<quoted text>
Thing...just in case you're going to correct my spelling. Queers have a problem with incorrect spelling ya know. LMFAO

Actually, I wouldn't waste my time on your spelling as it's absolutely stellar compared to your "though process".

BTW, how many times have you been "straight married" and how long have you been a alcoholic?

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Damn son how long did it take you to come up with that retort?

Bruno lays awake nights thinking up "snappy" retorts. This thread would shrivel up and die without his wit and wisdom.

I think that STFU was one of his most clever ones yet!

Prof Marvel wrote:

He isn't faking, readers...

If he was faking (or lying) he would be usurping your (very special) role on this thread!

PS you do know that the ONLY REASON anyone here, besides your azzpuppets reads your post is for a good laugh?

Prof Marvel wrote:

And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.

Did you pulled this "fact" out of the data base you keep up your butt? I say this becasue we have adopted three kids and the subject of CROSS DRESSING has never once come up on any form in any interview or during our home studies.

You seemed to have miss this during your "extensive research" but most cross dressers are actual HETEROSEXUAL.

It's amazing that someone who has "bend over backward during your years of "research" in gay bars and bath houses doesn't know the difference between a drag queen and cross dresser.

It appears there are some "gaps" in your education...maybe you need to enroll in one of those high schools full of homosexuals (and misguided heterosexual) and take one of those class on "peepee play" and "fisting" that you are always ranting about...

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?

And I just betcha that Gayry thinks he should be able to adopt? LOL,Zeus help us now oh great GOD! Hey Sly,have you heard about that bird? I heard that bird,bird,bird.......bird is the word! Kind of hot back there huh? LOL ;)

Prof Dingleberry wrote:

When you have a chance, you should check out AFTTAH. For an anti-gay website, they sure do seem to love tittilating pictures!! It's a website that is perfect for every little self loathing closet queer like Gary. They can be on it all day long!! I'm sure they have an entire staff that sits around googling all things gay all day long until they are able to find that special article or picture that gives them a boner, then they pass it on to the rest of the "group" via their website!!

It's a fundie male prostitute /porno ring masquerading as a service organization..and notice all the "not so gay looking" manly"jock" types they feature...

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?

Yet another example of how hopelessly confused these people are.

He calls "transgenders" homosexual, but calls cross-dressers heterosexual.

Why? Because in his wormy mind transgenders are normal while cross-dressers aren't.

And if you get the feeling he's making up this claptrap as he goes you're exactly right.

That's also what the LGBT community is doing when it tells you there's nothing wrong with transgender school teachers. That's what they did 30 years ago when they swore on a stack of Bibles there was nothing wrong with bath houses -- making up shit as they go.

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
Did you pulled this "fact" out of the data base you keep up your butt? I say this becasue we have adopted three kids and the subject of CROSS DRESSING has never once come up on any form in any interview or during our home studies.
You seemed to have miss this during your "extensive research" but most cross dressers are actual HETEROSEXUAL.
It's amazing that someone who has "bend over backward during your years of "research" in gay bars and bath houses doesn't know the difference between a drag queen and cross dresser.
It appears there are some "gaps" in your education...maybe you need to enroll in one of those high schools full of homosexuals (and misguided heterosexual) and take one of those class on "peepee play" and "fisting" that you are always ranting about...

Here's the point: heterosexuality is normal while everything else is abnormal.

All you're doing is trying to extend the definition of normal. You're doing this in graduated steps: first came homosexuality, then bisexuality, now transgender sexuality, tomorrow pedo-sexuality.

The second point is, if we allow this lunacy to continue we end up with a generation of Larry Brinkins running things.

Heterosexuality and homosexuality cannot co-exist; I've told you this before.

You've seen the gay pride parades -- that's what you people are all about: half-nude men marching down Main Street with erect penis hats on their heads.

That's all.

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet another example of how hopelessly confused these people are.
He calls "transgenders" homosexual, but calls cross-dressers heterosexual.
Why? Because in his wormy mind transgenders are normal while cross-dressers aren't.
And if you get the feeling he's making up this claptrap as he goes you're exactly right.
That's also what the LGBT community is doing when it tells you there's nothing wrong with transgender school teachers. That's what they did 30 years ago when they swore on a stack of Bibles there was nothing wrong with bath houses -- making up shit as they go.

LOL what a tard. I said this

Why do you think that all cross dressers are homosexuals?

Why do you think that transgenders are homosexuals?

Most cross dressers are heterosexuals.

If A man has a transgender operation and is now a woman, and she marries or dates a man how is she a homosexual?

Why would you stop a cross dresser from adopting a child?
Why would you stop a transgender person from adopting a child?

How does any of that affect a persons ability to nurture, love and raise a child?

Do you actually have a brain? You have not answered any of these questions. Is it because they are not on the list of talking points from your favorite web site? Don't you have the ability to formulate an opinion of your own? Are you a full blown retard or just plain stupid?

ELH wrote:

<quoted text>
I was so scared that I was quaking in my Manolo Blahnik's.

OMG sexy toes..... I still remember....

Prof Marvel wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's the point: heterosexuality is normal while everything else is abnormal.
All you're doing is trying to extend the definition of normal. You're doing this in graduated steps: first came homosexuality, then bisexuality, now transgender sexuality, tomorrow pedo-sexuality.
The second point is, if we allow this lunacy to continue we end up with a generation of Larry Brinkins running things.
Heterosexuality and homosexuality cannot co-exist; I've told you this before.
You've seen the gay pride parades -- that's what you people are all about: half-nude men marching down Main Street with erect penis hats on their heads.
That's all.

Yep its Friday night. All week long its been HIV/AIDs, then bath houses and now Gay Pride parades with men in giant pecker out fits.

I have to admit I had hopes when you expanded to cross dressers and transgender. Alas you must have realized that you where not talking about homosexuals and fell back to plan A.

Bill Of Rights wrote:

<quoted text>
And I just betcha that Gayry thinks he should be able to adopt? LOL,Zeus help us now oh great GOD! Hey Sly,have you heard about that bird? I heard that bird,bird,bird.......bird is the word! Kind of hot back there huh? LOL ;)

Can you imagine how frucked up his kids heads would be?

Been kinda warm to say the least.