Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,192

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

#147888 Jun 29, 2012
RomneyCare first wrote:
Every other developed country in the world has universal coverage, spends considerably less money per person on health care and they get
better results.
They have lower infant mortality, lower maternal
mortality and longer life expectancy.
Every other country does not add 5 trillion to their deficet, in 3 years by giving corpoorations tax payer money under the guise of stimulas, for jerking its citizens around with fraudulent loans.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

#147889 Jun 29, 2012
RomneyCare first wrote:
Unlike the Republican plans (cough, Medicare drug benefit, cough) it was all spelled out in the bill.
It's all paid for with some left over, according to CBO, to reduce the deficit.
Wonder if they factored in all the illegal aliens using US health care. Now the illegals can come here with there history of medical conditions and we tax payers still get to foot the bill.
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

#147890 Jun 29, 2012
RomneyCare first wrote:
The affordable care act will be modified over time, care will be rationed, and taxes paid by everyone.
You mean except those that do not make more then 150% of the poverty level, which now includes a lot of what used to be the middle class. And of course the illiegal aliens are bring their money to chip in also, LOL
Lalala

Las Vegas, NV

#147892 Jun 29, 2012
Bill Of Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey! Haven't you heard?LOL,Read the topic of the thread at the top of the page and get up to speed! Prop 8 declared "UNCONSTITUTIONAL" Not once but twice now! Gays had the right to marry and that right was taken away and this is what makes California different oh great ignoramus! So sorry but the law at least in California did discriminate against them and thus,UNCONSTITUTIONAL! Thanks for playing you can leave now Mr. human POS! LOL
Of course a homosexual judge would declare it unconstitutional, LOL. Especially when the law is all ready equal ANYONE CAN MARRY SOMEONE OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER.

“Yellow Brick Road”

Since: Mar 12

The Land of OZ

#147894 Jun 29, 2012
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course a homosexual judge would declare it unconstitutional, LOL. Especially when the law is all ready equal ANYONE CAN MARRY SOMEONE OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER.
Kinda makes you wonder why a state say Iowa, passed a law that allows same sex marriage, after their highest court said that prohibiting same sex marriage was unconstitutional. Huh maybe they are on to something after all.

Iowa's first dealings with same-sex marriage came in 1998, after recent court cases on same-sex unions, starting in Hawaii, found that denying the right to marry to same-sex couples was incompatible with the Equal Protection Clause of the state constitutions of most states. Iowa legislators hurried to pass a local Defense of Marriage Act to prohibit marriage between gay and lesbian couples to avoid a similar court challenge.

In 2005, Lambda Legal filed a lawsuit on behalf of six Polk County same-sex couples and their children who were denied marriage licenses in Iowa, arguing that this denial violated the liberty and equal protection clauses in the state constitution. In 2007, the Polk County District Court ruled in favor of the couples, prompting the county to appeal to the Iowa Supreme Court.[2] On April 3, 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously upheld the District Court's ruling holding that there was no important governmental interest in denying citizens marriage licenses based on their sexual orientation. Licenses were originally to be available 21 days after the ruling, on April 24, but the availability of licenses was subsequently postponed until April 27 due to a Furlough day.[1]
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#147895 Jun 29, 2012
RomneyCare first wrote:
Republicans said that they’ll try hard to repeal the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" starting with a July 11, 2012 repeal vote in the House of Representatives.
In other words they will continue the irresponsible, party first-country last temper tantrum that they have been throwing since Barak Obama was elected president.
What a sad sight this is as the nations needs burn while the Republican Nero's fiddle away and stomp their feet.
What a waste of taxpayer money and federal government time and effort this idiotic vote is.
What a collection of pathetic sore losers the contemporary Republican Party is.
ObamaCare would not got as far as it did if the truth was told from the start. The great obama was selling it as NOT a tax, that it would pay for itself, Now to get it passed by the Supreme Court, it's a TAX. And it will be a TAX for the middle class. Roberts wrote that the law "makes going without insurance just another thing the government taxes, like buying gasoline or earning an income." Only reason it passed. This is a tax where you must pay if you don't purchase. It's a tax on a product you must buy just because you are breathing. And you will continue to pay for free health care after this pile of doo-doo goes into effect. There are still several million people excused. You will have to pay more in taxes to pay for increased numbers on Medicaid. You will have to pay more in taxes to subsidize premiums for all those people who don't have insurance now because they can't afford. Where do you think they are going to get the money to pay for it in 2014? You my friend...YOU and me.
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#147896 Jun 29, 2012
RomneyCare first wrote:
Next the twerp posting from Las Vegas will be asking US to send water to them?
Suck it up, get all the water you want from that idiot calling himself, Mitt Romney.
Where does your LA water come from? Limit your usage, al gore is watching you shower. You are draining beautiful mountain lakes.
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#147898 Jun 29, 2012
Lalala wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course a homosexual judge would declare it unconstitutional, LOL. Especially when the law is all ready equal ANYONE CAN MARRY SOMEONE OF THE OPPOSITE GENDER.
Funny,then explain the higher court also upholding it! His being gay had nothing to do with it! Read the summery and you can plainly see that it was indeed on Constitutional grounds! Equal treatment under the law! Gays had the right and it was voted away and we don't vote on Constructional given rights in this country! Prop 8 was and is simply Unconstitutional period!

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Baltimore, MD

#147900 Jun 29, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you think that trans genders are homosexuals?
Why do you think that cross dressers are homosexuals?
Why should transgender people not be allowed to adopt a child.
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
I am Irish, my father was Irish. On St Paddy's day and a few other occasions he wore a skirt,( Kilt) He was a great dad. The fact that he wore a skirt on occasions did not make him any less a dad, or a man. In fact if he where alive ( He would be 90) I bet he could kick your ass. He was not a cross dresser, yet he did
have a nice green and black plaid skirt. Nothing flashy, knee high length.
Say next years St Paddy's day parade if you see a guy in a kilt, why don't you call him a queer. Let me know how long you where knocked the fuck out for. I bet 2 or 3 minuites at least.
"...Why should transgender people not be allowed to adopt a child.
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals....
And there you haven't, folks -- they call it "equality."

And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.

Well, let's see by a show of hands how many of you straight morons who support same sex marriage are all for allowing cross-dressers to adopt.

C'mon, now -- show Clyde you got his back.

“Yellow Brick Road”

Since: Mar 12

The Land of OZ

#147907 Jun 29, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
And there you haven't, folks -- they call it "equality."
And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.
Well, let's see by a show of hands how many of you straight morons who support same sex marriage are all for allowing cross-dressers to adopt.
C'mon, now -- show Clyde you got his back.

Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?

“Yellow Brick Road”

Since: Mar 12

The Land of OZ

#147908 Jun 29, 2012
Yoga wrote:
A 39-year-old Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy was arrested early Friday June 29, 2012 police said he was found in a parked car with a 15-year-old girl at 2 a.m. in San Fernando, California.
The Professor will be OK with that. Its a man and a girl, you know the way god intended it. Never mind that the girl was 15, if she old enough to bleed shes old enough to breed, Aint that right Professor?
ELH

Portland, OR

#147909 Jun 29, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
P.S., I am very much happy to see that the FBI has not arrested you.
I was so scared that I was quaking in my Manolo Blahnik's.
ELH

Portland, OR

#147910 Jun 29, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Good think the higher ups don't see the shi+ you post on here cause they'd fire your a$$. You're an IDIOT, a stupid idiot. Probably a Queer idiot. LMFAO
The "higher ups"? Funny. You don't know much about me do you candyazz?

If you did then you would know that I almost always post here from WORK. BTW my coworkers agree on my assessment that Professor/Doctor spam-a-lot is a raging closed queen and that YOU are either a home schooled twelve year old boy or a VERY insecure sissy man. Funny right?
ELH

Portland, OR

#147911 Jun 29, 2012
NoQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Thing...just in case you're going to correct my spelling. Queers have a problem with incorrect spelling ya know. LMFAO


Actually, I wouldn't waste my time on your spelling as it's absolutely stellar compared to your "though process".

BTW, how many times have you been "straight married" and how long have you been a alcoholic?
ELH

Portland, OR

#147912 Jun 29, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>Damn son how long did it take you to come up with that retort?
Bruno lays awake nights thinking up "snappy" retorts. This thread would shrivel up and die without his wit and wisdom.

I think that STFU was one of his most clever ones yet!
ELH

Portland, OR

#147913 Jun 29, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
He isn't faking, readers...
If he was faking (or lying) he would be usurping your (very special) role on this thread!

PS you do know that the ONLY REASON anyone here, besides your azzpuppets reads your post is for a good laugh?
ELH

Portland, OR

#147914 Jun 29, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
And you thought I was kidding when I told you they wanted adoption rights for cross-dressers.
Did you pulled this "fact" out of the data base you keep up your butt? I say this becasue we have adopted three kids and the subject of CROSS DRESSING has never once come up on any form in any interview or during our home studies.

You seemed to have miss this during your "extensive research" but most cross dressers are actual HETEROSEXUAL.

It's amazing that someone who has "bend over backward during your years of "research" in gay bars and bath houses doesn't know the difference between a drag queen and cross dresser.

It appears there are some "gaps" in your education...maybe you need to enroll in one of those high schools full of homosexuals (and misguided heterosexual) and take one of those class on "peepee play" and "fisting" that you are always ranting about...
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#147915 Jun 29, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?
And I just betcha that Gayry thinks he should be able to adopt? LOL,Zeus help us now oh great GOD! Hey Sly,have you heard about that bird? I heard that bird,bird,bird.......bird is the word! Kind of hot back there huh? LOL ;)
ELH

Portland, OR

#147916 Jun 29, 2012
Prof Dingleberry wrote:
When you have a chance, you should check out AFTTAH. For an anti-gay website, they sure do seem to love tittilating pictures!! It's a website that is perfect for every little self loathing closet queer like Gary. They can be on it all day long!! I'm sure they have an entire staff that sits around googling all things gay all day long until they are able to find that special article or picture that gives them a boner, then they pass it on to the rest of the "group" via their website!!
It's a fundie male prostitute /porno ring masquerading as a service organization..and notice all the "not so gay looking" manly"jock" types they feature...

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Baltimore, MD

#147918 Jun 29, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should cross dressers not be allowed to be a parent? I bet there are lots of them. After all most cross dressers are heterosexuals.
You are a heterosexual, or at least you claim to be. Should we deny you the ability to be a parent?
Yet another example of how hopelessly confused these people are.

He calls "transgenders" homosexual, but calls cross-dressers heterosexual.

Why? Because in his wormy mind transgenders are normal while cross-dressers aren't.

And if you get the feeling he's making up this claptrap as he goes you're exactly right.

That's also what the LGBT community is doing when it tells you there's nothing wrong with transgender school teachers. That's what they did 30 years ago when they swore on a stack of Bibles there was nothing wrong with bath houses -- making up shit as they go.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Francisco Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
i think my husband may be gay?? 2 hr rodes scoler 6
Water signs 4 hr guest 2
Are we dumping the homeless? 7 hr uppercut 3
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 15 hr seven tee plus tw... 56,660
Tour Guide's Chinatown Rant Thu rodes scoler 5
Hunter Strickland Thu Sfgiants11 1
Oakland Tribune editorial: Public deserves answ... Thu OMF 1

San Francisco News Video

San Francisco Dating
Find my Match

San Francisco Jobs

San Francisco People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

San Francisco News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in San Francisco

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]