Six suspects deny guilt in Novato homicide; trial date set

1. judge orders face to face because that is the only way to insure witness authenticity
2. unionized deputees DECIDE not to follow the judges orders...thusly endangering witnesses and tainting all testinomy. Again, this is done by the UNION JAIL DEPUTEES.
3. The accused/witnesses adjust their testimony to achieve the single goal of STAYING ALIVE IN JAIL.....Not the case at hand. The the accused, the case at hand becomes a secondary issue. The prime directive becomes jail life...soon to be prison life. Whatever the crime was is irrelevant and not worthy of consideration. Why spend the time? It won't make any difference in jail except maybe to make you nice...which you do not want to be.

Why these kids are Done
Redwood City, CA wrote-

1. judge orders face to face because that is the only way to insure witness authenticity
2. unionized deputees DECIDE not to follow the judges orders...thusly endangering witnesses and tainting all testinomy. Again, this is done by the UNION JAIL DEPUTEES.

HMMM.. sounds like you might be related to one of these "outstanding " law abiding citizens in jail. Or maybe a sniveling defense attorney. Lets hope that justice prevails for the victims family.

Why these kids are Done wrote:

1. judge orders face to face because that is the only way to insure witness authenticity
2. unionized deputees DECIDE not to follow the judges orders...thusly endangering witnesses and tainting all testinomy. Again, this is done by the UNION JAIL DEPUTEES.
3. The accused/witnesses adjust their testimony to achieve the single goal of STAYING ALIVE IN JAIL.....Not the case at hand. The the accused, the case at hand becomes a secondary issue. The prime directive becomes jail life...soon to be prison life. Whatever the crime was is irrelevant and not worthy of consideration. Why spend the time? It won't make any difference in jail except maybe to make you nice...which you do not want to be.

First of all, it's deputies. If you are going to make up crap at least spell things right. Second, these are POS gang member from Hunters Point. Endangering witnesses, do you mean like shooting them at close range with a high powered rifle like the defendants in this case did. They are going exactly where they were destined to go. PRISON!

Find a nice oak tree on the hill next to the jail...string a noose around one of the limbs....and hang the punks. Le didn't get to defend himself, why should they? Cowardly bastards.

fo real wrote:

<quoted text>
First of all, it's deputies. If you are going to make up crap at least spell things right. Second, these are POS gang member from Hunters Point. Endangering witnesses, do you mean like shooting them at close range with a high powered rifle like the defendants in this case did. They are going exactly where they were destined to go. PRISON!

You're not exactly a genius when it comes to using proper grammar either, Zippy.

fo real wrote:

<quoted text>
First of all, it's deputies. If you are going to make up crap at least spell things right. Second, these are POS gang member from Hunters Point. Endangering witnesses, do you mean like shooting them at close range with a high powered rifle like the defendants in this case did. They are going exactly where they were destined to go. PRISON!

What's wrong with Hunter's point Gangsters? I used to walk through that hood every morning to work at the scaffold shop. Loved it! Never any trouble at all...totally safe streets....clean streets. I am a white 6 foot longhaired freak.
You need the fax:
1 In gov. housing.. the gang is the law. The police encourage it.
2. The gang IS the police...they protect you and the street MUCH better than the PD ever did...the pd agrees with this...but cannot say so publicly....but their behavior proves it...they allow gangs....the USE gangs.

I also lived in south San Francisco and worked scaffold there. The local gang housed me, employed me, and I had no real trouble. The streets were safe at night...I used to stroll to the bar and back...no worries. The police had a clean deal with the gangs and there was peace and security.
The gangs were created in a legal vacuum.
The police would not provide equal protection for the poor.
The poor took it upon themselves to police their own warrens.
The police saw this a a "money saver"....and so allowed it.
The practice of "delegating" is as old as civilization.
So don't hate the gangsta...she might be your grandma.

Until a trial and proven guilty ( NOT GUILTY ) What part of this dont you dummies understand? Thats why we have a court and a judge. Quit your stupid chatter listen and learn !!!

Trial wrote:

Until a trial and proven guilty ( NOT GUILTY ) What part of this dont you dummies understand? Thats why we have a court and a judge. Quit your stupid chatter listen and learn !!!

HAHAHAHA....lets get real...GUILTY as hell, those little qveers first had to rob the poor guy's store, then their dumba**es got caught b/c they are to stupid to commit a robbery.....so they kill the poor guy, you think Novato PD magically picked those stupid fVcks in SF for sh1ts and giggles? and the mother is a piece of garbage, crack head piece of sh1t.......TIME TO FRY THOSE B1TCH A$$ WANNABES

abc415 wrote:

<quoted text>
HAHAHAHA....lets get real...GUILTY as hell, those little qveers first had to rob the poor guy's store, then their dumba**es got caught b/c they are to stupid to commit a robbery.....so they kill the poor guy, you think Novato PD magically picked those stupid fVcks in SF for sh1ts and giggles? and the mother is a piece of garbage, crack head piece of sh1t.......TIME TO FRY THOSE **** WANNABES

There you go again. If it was your family would you want a jury trial or guilty from the beginning like you say here stupid. Did you ever read that cops are not always right in their homework ? look at NY and the garbage that goes on there. You are just plain stupid and donot belong on any jury

Was O.J. Simpson found guilty NO NO No Guess you don't like that either. The system works except in your case where your mind is made up not knowing all the facts. What the paper prints and the FACTS that come out in court are two different things. Oh sorry don't mean to confuse your little simple mind. Maybe just smoke some more and take a nap

The sheriff cannot arbitrarily decide to not enforce a court order- this will hose the case at least temporarily. And Ed: you better go capital on all these losers or you are out.

Trial wrote:

Was O.J. Simpson found guilty NO NO No Guess you don't like that either. The system works except in your case where your mind is made up not knowing all the facts. What the paper prints and the FACTS that come out in court are two different things. Oh sorry don't mean to confuse your little simple mind. Maybe just smoke some more and take a nap

he was found not guilty due to technicalities.......but look at the civil trial, he was found guilty real quick

Trotsky wrote:

The sheriff cannot arbitrarily decide to not enforce a court order- this will hose the case at least temporarily. And Ed: you better go capital on all these losers or you are out.

They already DID the non enforcement and taint the holy poopoo outta this case.
The unionized sheriff deputies are not interested in doing a good job every time.
They are like baseball players...if they bat .350...that's excellent. The side effect is a whole lot of innocents fill our prisons...and many are innocent VETERANS.
I once asked a Marin Sheriff deputy at the courthouse to compare the effort of a. making a bust or b. making a sandwich. He admitted that he would commit MORE effort to the sandwich.
It is the union. That is the brain sucker here. That is the talent stifler. That is the civil right stealer....the union.These deputies owe their allegiance to the union...not the law. The law runs a distant second in terms of priorities.
Until we face this huge monster...every aspect of our culture will continue to crumble...just like these union bridges, and your child's upside down unionized belief system. Vote Sarah!

abc415 wrote:

<quoted text>
he was found not guilty due to technicalities.......but look at the civil trial, he was found guilty real quick

That was becuase of people just like you with no common sense

Sense wrote:

<quoted text> That was becuase of people just like you with no common sense

really??? common sense wouldnt tell you that OJ was guilty?

abc415 wrote:

<quoted text>
really??? common sense wouldnt tell you that OJ was guilty?

No a jury tells me the truth and hears everything unlike your a-- NOT GUILTY GET IT NOT GUILTY

"The six suspects live in a public housing complex near Le's former liquor store."

Public housing breeds vermin.

THE JURY wrote:

<quoted text> No a jury tells me the truth and hears everything unlike your a-- NOT GUILTY GET IT NOT GUILTY

LOL....if it doesnt fit you must acquit

Hello IJ, it's not "homicide," it's "Murder" -- execution style.

Hope that doesn't offend your PC sensitity.

SCUM.....