Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Become a Topix Editor today!

topix
Advertisment

Forum & Polls

News

NewsWire

Physics

Origin and properties of gravitation and quantum interaction

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 3 of 3
Boris
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Mar 14, 2008
 
We know all about a plenty of hypotheses on which is based modern variants of the field theory. However many fundamental problems still have no decision. It gives the basis for doubts in expediency of the further following this gate.

In this connection the following question is rather pertinent: Whether it is possible to discuss problems of the unified field theory without attraction of the attention to hypotheses, postulates and other revelations? Whether enough we have experimental data and the equations based on them to solve field problems?

We answer: Yes, if problems of interaction of material bodies and particles will be considered by means of classical electrodynamics.

This point of view is given in detail here: http://www.realphys.com/en/Paper_en_04.html
In the same place the software is presented for calculations of forces of strong interaction and gravitation.

Your comments and objections are necessary to us for the further research of this problem.

Yours faithfully,
Boris
socratus
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Mar 22, 2008
 
1.
Where has the first material gravitation particle appeared from ?
Now it is considered, that reference frame which
is connected with relict isotropic radiation
T = 2,7K is absolute.
But T = 2,7K is not a constant factor.
This relict isotropic radiation continues to increase and
its temperature will decrease.
And, hence, approximately over a period of
20 billions years it will reach T=0K.
Therefore the gravitation particle can appears from
Nothing, from Vacuum, from Absolute Zero: T=0K.
1.
Let us take some area of Vacuum (T=0K)
and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area of Vacuum
we will mark with letter N.
Then every particle of this area has
gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
2.
Can they have volume?"
No.
Because according to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degree the volume
disappears. The physicists say, if the particle
has completely lost its volume
the physical parameters of particles become infinite.
But such statement contradicts the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy".
And then we must understand that the sense of the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy" is.
We should understand and accept that
when volume of the particles disappears
they become "indefinitely flat figures ".
What do "indefinitely flat figures " mean?
They mean, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we also cannot reach density of the particle in the T=0K.
The “ Charles law” was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925).
These " flat figures " have the geometrical form
of a circle, as from all flat figures the circle has the most
optimal form: C/D= pi = 3,14.
These R/N= k particles are initial gravitational particles.
==========
Which is common condition of gravitation?
Let us suppose that in some local sphere of Vacuum
the quantity of the passive particles ( k) that is equal to
the number Avogadro N was found.
Then according to the principle of Boltzmann,
the gathering of the particles in some local sphere of Vacuum
has a probable basis: S= klnW.
It is common condition of gravitation.
==========
How did from these gravitation particles (k )
the first material particles appear ?
1.
The first material particles was called “helium”, because
helium exist very – very near absolute zero: T=0K.
Nobody knows what helium is.(!)
Why?
Because the behavior of helium is absolutely different
from all another elements of Nature.(!)
!!!!
I will try to explain, how the helium
was created from R/N=k.
2.
The helium exist very near absolute zero: T=0K.
Therefore we must take in attention the processes
of superfluids and superconductors , which require extremely
low temperatures , approximately 0K.
3.
Then , the first particles which were created
from R/N =k could be helium II ( He II ),
which created temperature 2,7K.
4.
Then , the second particles which were created
from helium II ( He II ), could be helium I ( He I ),
which created temperature 4,2K.
/ Kapitza / Landau theory./
5.
And then all the system comes to rotary movement.
But helium rotates differently from all other liquids.
If one rotates helium very strongly, it starts to behave not as liquid
but as elastic body
(experience of E.L. Andronikashvili./Georgia./).
Separate layers of helium become elastic ropes that change
the picture of quiet uniform rotation completely.
In such rotation sharp friction between different
layers of the liquid originates. From rotary elastic ropes
the slices of substance of various size come off.
Boris
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Mar 24, 2008
 
Dear socratus,

You have set many questions and have mentioned many basic problems.
However our problem and a theme were easier.
We for the first time have calculated force of gravitation, proceeding only from electrodynamics laws.
Also We have defined the electrodynamic reason of fundamental quantum interactions.

I very much hope, that you will comment to Fig.3 and Fig.5 in our work on which we have given in the reference.

Yours faithfully,
Poltor
Showing posts 1 - 3 of 3
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Physics Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Stephen Hawking in hunt for Africa's hidden talent 1 hr Bama Yankee 16
The PN Diode as a Circuit Switch Sat hschlang 1
An inverse adhesion problem for extracting inte... Sat peter 1
Restore science funding Sat simple as this 1
I have a question.... Sat Darwins Step... 2
"Lost" Science Debunked May 7 legs4miles 12
One big bang is usually all it takes May 5 FrenchKissoff 5