prehistoric deadliest warriors

we will find out who were the prehistoric deadliest warriors

This is too general,for instance we can't have Megalodon vs T-Rex

How about Purrusaurus vs Livyatan? Votes for both deep and shallow water.

dinotrek27 wrote:

How about Purrusaurus vs Livyatan? Votes for both deep and shallow water.

This is a possible fight.
I don't know
Purrusaurus got a formidable bite but Lyvitan may have a thick layer of fat like a sperm whale.Both need to come to the surface to breath.I think Purrusaurus is slightly more manuverable.Still,Basically 50/50 in my opinion.

first fighters are tyrannosaurus rex who was the most fearsome and powerful land predator to ever walked the earth vs spinosaurus ageypticas was the biggest carnivore to ever walked the earth now we will who is deadliest tyrannosaurus bite force was greater than any dinosaur it can crush a car,it has a infections bite,it has a large brain,it can smell its prey from 3 miles away,it has a binocular vision,its arms can lift 180 pound. spinosaurus has a weaker bite force than t-rex,it does not have infections bite,it has smaller brain than its opponent so it doesn't have a great vision and sense of smell,its arms can lift little more weight than its opponent. the fight takes place in a open grass land, a hungry t-rex is looking for food suddenly it saw a spinosaurus and attacks it spinosaurus quickly dodges and scratches in the face of t-rex,t-rex roars in pain and became very angry and charges toward to the spinosaurus and spinosaurus bites the neck and grabs neck of the t-rex with its hands and tries to break it but the t-rex escapes and bite the neck of the spinosaurus and breaks then the t-rex roars in victory and eat the spinosaurus winner is tyrannosaurus rex

what fight you guys what to see but one at a time

Omega T-Rex wrote:

first fighters are tyrannosaurus rex who was the most fearsome and powerful land predator to ever walked the earth vs spinosaurus ageypticas was the biggest carnivore to ever walked the earth now we will who is deadliest tyrannosaurus bite force was greater than any dinosaur it can crush a car,it has a infections bite,it has a large brain,it can smell its prey from 3 miles away,it has a binocular vision,its arms can lift 180 pound. spinosaurus has a weaker bite force than t-rex,it does not have infections bite,it has smaller brain than its opponent so it doesn't have a great vision and sense of smell,its arms can lift little more weight than its opponent. the fight takes place in a open grass land, a hungry t-rex is looking for food suddenly it saw a spinosaurus and attacks it spinosaurus quickly dodges and scratches in the face of t-rex,t-rex roars in pain and became very angry and charges toward to the spinosaurus and spinosaurus bites the neck and grabs neck of the t-rex with its hands and tries to break it but the t-rex escapes and bite the neck of the spinosaurus and breaks then the t-rex roars in victory and eat the spinosaurus winner is tyrannosaurus rex

T rex lifts 180 pounds in each arm, Spino lifts 3,000 pounds in each arm.

Nitrox wrote:

<quoted text>T rex lifts 180 pounds in each arm, Spino lifts 3,000 pounds in each arm.

Yeah but could they actually grap an object and lift it. They don't exactly have thumbs.

Um......................... XD

Nitrox wrote:

<quoted text>T rex lifts 180 pounds in each arm, Spino lifts 3,000 pounds in each arm.

Actually T. rex could lift 225 pounds or more EACH arm, also, how can you tell that? We have no arms, no lifting eivedence.

For Spinosaurus.

Omega T-Rex wrote:

first fighters are tyrannosaurus rex who was the most fearsome and powerful land predator to ever walked the earth vs spinosaurus ageypticas was the biggest carnivore to ever walked the earth now we will who is deadliest tyrannosaurus bite force was greater than any dinosaur it can crush a car,it has a infections bite,it has a large brain,it can smell its prey from 3 miles away,it has a binocular vision,its arms can lift 180 pound. spinosaurus has a weaker bite force than t-rex,it does not have infections bite,it has smaller brain than its opponent so it doesn't have a great vision and sense of smell,its arms can lift little more weight than its opponent. the fight takes place in a open grass land, a hungry t-rex is looking for food suddenly it saw a spinosaurus and attacks it spinosaurus quickly dodges and scratches in the face of t-rex,t-rex roars in pain and became very angry and charges toward to the spinosaurus and spinosaurus bites the neck and grabs neck of the t-rex with its hands and tries to break it but the t-rex escapes and bite the neck of the spinosaurus and breaks then the t-rex roars in victory and eat the spinosaurus winner is tyrannosaurus rex

How do you know iif it had an infectious bite? Spino could have had that too. You are biased towards T-rex in this round without stating Spino's advantages. Spino's advantages are size, height and claws. The seting is also biased since Spino more frequently inhabited the waterways. You should have placed the setting at a riverbank in which the Rex came down to drink and met the Spino. Plus, their arms are much stronger and bigger than a Rexes and cause much damage. Not just a scratch to the face. And no sane creature would try to grab a T-Rexes neck.

How about Helicoprion vs Hyneria? Oh and Kaprosuchus vs Tiger?

dinotrek27 wrote:

<quoted text>
How do you know iif it had an infectious bite? Spino could have had that too. You are biased towards T-rex in this round without stating Spino's advantages. Spino's advantages are size, height and claws. The seting is also biased since Spino more frequently inhabited the waterways. You should have placed the setting at a riverbank in which the Rex came down to drink and met the Spino. Plus, their arms are much stronger and bigger than a Rexes and cause much damage. Not just a scratch to the face. And no sane creature would try to grab a T-Rexes neck.

1/ Because we did a study and many paleontologists made a theory that T. rex had a bacterial bite.
2/ Sure Spinosaurus could. Don't call him biased, you just hate it when anyone "overestimates" T. rex.
3/ Size does not matter with Dinosaurs, claws? How many times can I tell you they were slung below the body and he can't rear up with 20 tons of mass.
3/ Arms stronger and bigger? Sure, but they were placed below the body. Even a slash could only get to the very lower knee if not lower, the arms were only 4 feet of the ground.
In a fight of T. rex vs Spinosaurus = 65/35 or more to T. rex in my theory.

Fusionsaurus Rex wrote:

<quoted text>
1/ Because we did a study and many paleontologists made a theory that T. rex had a bacterial bite.
2/ Sure Spinosaurus could. Don't call him biased, you just hate it when anyone "overestimates" T. rex.
3/ Size does not matter with Dinosaurs, claws? How many times can I tell you they were slung below the body and he can't rear up with 20 tons of mass.
3/ Arms stronger and bigger? Sure, but they were placed below the body. Even a slash could only get to the very lower knee if not lower, the arms were only 4 feet of the ground.
In a fight of T. rex vs Spinosaurus = 65/35 or more to T. rex in my theory.

1/Actually,the bacteria theory is based on Kmodo dragons who is recently proven to have venom instead of bacteria
2/He is telling what he thinks
3/Size matters,the claws could not slash the face sure but from the side,the claws could inflict nasty injuries even placing below the body allow Spinosaurus arms(if it's as large as we think it is) could reach the tibia of Rex and could do damage in the stomach area also.
Yes still Rex would win 55-45-65/35 against a Spinosaurus.

dinotrek27 wrote:

How about Helicoprion vs Hyneria? Oh and Kaprosuchus vs Tiger?

I think Helicoprion would win because it has a nasty row of serrated teeth.
Kaprosuchus vs Tiger,I think 50/50

forget the fight between t-rex and spinosaurus its not so good i will remake that but this time it will be very good you guys will like but it will take some time

Balaur wrote:

<quoted text>
1/Actually,the bacteria theory is based on Kmodo dragons who is recently proven to have venom instead of bacteria
2/He is telling what he thinks
3/Size matters,the claws could not slash the face sure but from the side,the claws could inflict nasty injuries even placing below the body allow Spinosaurus arms(if it's as large as we think it is) could reach the tibia of Rex and could do damage in the stomach area also.
Yes still Rex would win 55-45-65/35 against a Spinosaurus.

1/ Still, it's possible. But ok.
2/ Alright.
3/ No it does NOT!!!! Yes, and the sides would only be if he reared up, Spinosaurus would only be able to slash the very-lower femur heights.
4/ Yeah, I will go Lowe, I first thought 70/30 but then I lowerd to 65/35.

Fusionsaurus Rex wrote:

<quoted text>
3/ No it does NOT!!!! Yes, and the sides would only be if he reared up, Spinosaurus would only be able to slash the very-lower femur heights.

OK, so you think a Velociraptor would beat an Argentinosaurus then?

A Plot Device wrote:

<quoted text>
OK, so you think a Velociraptor would beat an Argentinosaurus then?

I just mean like a 10-13 foot difference (in length).