|
Spinosaur King
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> the 2005 del sasso study. ACCURATE!? they didnt use spinosaurs relatives to get that estimate so it cant be corrcet. Other wise as ive said you could use the old figures for spino on a giga with a head nearly 2m long, that would get an animal nearly 20m long. that study is 4, nearly five years old, the stuy i reffer yto is much newer and it is correct exept about spino's size.
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Spinosaur King wrote: <quoted text> that study is 4, nearly five years old, the stuy i reffer yto is much newer and it is correct exept about spino's size. the spino size bit is the part i was on about but wait you were agreeing wit it before now you arent???
|
|
Spinosaur King
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> the spino size bit is the part i was on about but wait you were agreeing wit it before now you arent??? no i agree with spinos LEGNTH in the Therrien and Henderson study but not the weight.
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Spinosaur King wrote: <quoted text> no i agree with spinos LEGNTH in the Therrien and Henderson study but not the weight. oh right. Thing is though do you belive it so much to say that all spinosaurs will have to be down sized? p.s i dont belive any of it as you know.
|
|
Spinosaur King
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> oh right. Thing is though do you belive it so much to say that all spinosaurs will have to be down sized? p.s i dont belive any of it as you know. nope, all other spin0osauroids will stay the same untill proven oterwise.
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Spinosaur King wrote: <quoted text> nope, all other spin0osauroids will stay the same untill proven oterwise. but that would put spino very out of proportion to its relatives, which is one of the reasons i dissagree with the new figures.
|
|
h0devil
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
Carcharodontosaurus Tyrannotitan
|
|
h0devil
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
|
|
Spinosaur King
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> but that would put spino very out of proportion to its relatives, which is one of the reasons i dissagree with the new figures. no it wouldn't: Baryonyx=8 meters+? Suchosaurus=8 meters+? Irritator=7 meters+? Suchomimus=11 meters+? Siamosaurus=10 meters+? Spinosaurus=12-14 meters
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Spinosaur King wrote: <quoted text> no it wouldn't: Baryonyx=8 meters+? Suchosaurus=8 meters+? Irritator=7 meters+? Suchomimus=11 meters+? Siamosaurus=10 meters+? Spinosaurus=12-14 meters with a miles bigger head compared to its body than them. Oh and i like the way u put a ? next to them all except spino.
|
|
Spinosaur King
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> with a miles bigger head compared to its body than them. Oh and i like the way u put a ? next to them all except spino. i meant to put the ? next to spino too but i must have misstyped it.
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Spinosaur King wrote: <quoted text> i meant to put the ? next to spino too but i must have misstyped it. oh ok then
|
|
Giganotosaurus Fan
Basildon, UK
|
Giganotosaurus was underrated,It was 52 feet long and 10 tons, the largest land predator.GIGA RULES!
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Giganotosaurus Fan wrote: Giganotosaurus was underrated,It was 52 feet long and 10 tons, the largest land predator.GIGA RULES! can i ask, do you even no what 52ft is in metres? and that 10tons is like 9t? Although i agree that giga is underrated (as most large carnivores except for t-rex are) please stop being a retard. Oh there is this pincus guy who thinks dino never existed, that means giga as well!
|
|
Giganotosaurus Fan
Basildon, UK
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> can i ask, do you even no what 52ft is in metres? and that 10tons is like 9t? Although i agree that giga is underrated (as most large carnivores except for t-rex are) please stop being a retard. Oh there is this pincus guy who thinks dino never existed, that means giga as well! 52 feet is 16 meters no?it wa that big its a fact and yes it is underrated, rex is a peice of Sh*t that doesn't share any of its fame with giga or any other big carnivores.WHAT? Who is this pincus guy hes a motherf*cking bich.
|
|
Spinodontosaurus
Penrith, UK
|
Giganotosaurus Fan wrote: <quoted text> 52 feet is 16 meters no?it wa that big its a fact and yes it is underrated, rex is a peice of Sh*t that doesn't share any of its fame with giga or any other big carnivores.WHAT? Who is this pincus guy hes a motherf*cking bich. 16m sounds about right, and yes rex gets to much attention. http://www.topix.com/forum/science/dinosaurs/... is a stupid thread made by Pincus Shain Tel Aviv the "motherf*cking bich".
|
|
lemmings armegedonn
Barrow, UK
|
All of them are underrated (except t-rex, it overrated). But Lemmingosaurus is the most underrated. Bigger and heavier than the previous biggest, spinosaurs, and lived at the same time as it!
|
|
PaudieN1
Poland
|
Spinodontosaurus wrote: <quoted text> can i ask, do you even no what 52ft is in metres? and that 10tons is like 9t? Although i agree that giga is underrated (as most large carnivores except for t-rex are) please stop being a retard. Oh there is this pincus guy who thinks dino never existed, that means giga as well! Why did you single out Rex? Rex is just as underrated as any.
|
|
PaudieN1
Poland
|
lemmings armegedonn wrote: All of them are underrated (except t-rex, it overrated). But Lemmingosaurus is the most underrated. Bigger and heavier than the previous biggest, spinosaurs, and lived at the same time as it! Everything about that comment is wrong!
|
|
Justyn Williams
Perrysburg, OH
|
|
|
|