'Humankind solely responsible for climate change'

As is typical of the AGW panic-mongers, the guy's claims are made out of thin air, without substance or backing.

GlynnMhor wrote:

As is typical of the AGW panic-mongers, the guy's claims are made out of thin air, without substance or backing.

You are right that this is a political statement, not a scientific one. No peer reveiwed research was referenced in his statement.

That said, the 'AGW panic monger' labelling is pure bafflegab.

Heh heh heh... you think that calling for billions of dollars in transfers every year plus carbon strngling our economies doesn't constitute a panic reaction?

It does. And the fear and alarmism being hypoed way out of proportion to any actual putative problem with AGW merely confirms how excessive the panic-mongers really are.

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
You are right that this is a political statement, not a scientific one. No peer reveiwed research was referenced in his statement.
That said, the 'AGW panic monger' labelling is pure bafflegab.

but he IS an AGW panic monger at best, but what he also is , is a superstitious primitive who apparently thinks there was NO climate change at all before man came along and invented machinery . that's not scientific at all. But hang on, that's exactly what YOU think as well! Perhaps this fakir has some peers in the witch doctor community, or the bogus swami association. His science is the same level as Al Gores.

"Humankind solely responsible for climate change"

Look people the solution is simple, we kill off all the people, that way we wont have any AGW and we would not have to listen to the idiot AGWers.

But then we will have TGW (Termite Global Warming), but at least we wont have any "greenies"

I hope LessFact's enjoying his share of GW, basking in the balmy -12 °C Toronto warmth.

Mr Giblets wrote:

<quoted text>but he IS an AGW panic monger ..

No. That is a collection of adjectives, not a definition. To justify the adjectives, you must FIRST show that his opinions are wrong, not just *assume* them.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!! forhet the story the headline is priceless. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

-yernogood wrote:

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!! forhet the story the headline is priceless. BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

I find the post interesting as it truly shows that you have earned you handle..'yernottoobright' would also do.

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
I find the post interesting as it truly shows that you have earned you handle..'yernottoobright' would also do.

so you believe that humans are totally responsible for Climate Change? ALL climate change? caused by volcanoes? meteorites? El Nino? La Nina?

I expect you think Bush killed the dinosaurs. Did we cause the Ice Age?

Mr Giblets wrote:

<quoted text>
so you believe

Easy 'clue' to the following being a red herring or strawman formed from bullshit.

Mr Giblets wrote:

<quoted text>
that humans are totally responsible for Climate Change?

I have LEARNED that human GHG emissions are responsible for MOST of the warmign in the global average surface temperature. I UNDERSTAND that this will have effects on climate beyond the usual range.

Mr Giblets wrote:

<quoted text>
ALL climate change? caused by volcanoes? meteorites? El Nino? La Nina?

Of course, not. Many factor influence climate. Some short term. Some longer. Decadal scale climate oscillations such as ENSO ( El_Nino and La_Nina in the postivie and negative phase) are cyclical and have no long term meaning, unlike AGW. Volcanoes are erratic and usually short lived for one big enough to affect global climate.

But not of this CHANGES the influence of AGW on climate. It is not 'either or'.

Mr Giblets wrote:

<quoted text>
I expect you think Bush killed the dinosaurs. Did we cause the Ice Age?

Giblets. You don't have to take EVERY opportunity to show your ignorance and stupidity. How about giving it a rest?

So LessFact, "LEARNED" that humans are responsible for, "MOST of the warmign" since the LIA ended in 1850, almost all of the 1 ºF of it.

I'd like to meet his teacher.

Earthling wrote:

So LessFact, "LEARNED" that humans are responsible for, "MOST of the warmign" since the LIA ended in 1850, almost all of the 1 ºF of it.
I'd like to meet his teacher.

The IPCC report stated the warming as of 2001 as 1F. It has warmed significantly more since. Aerosols have not increased notably, and the 200 year sunspot cycle is in a cooling so the present warming is solidly GHG generated, according to the SCIENCE.

As to teachers, you may need one, as you seem somewhat juvenile. I have graduated long ago and I am quite capable of 'going to the source' science papers.

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
The IPCC report stated the warming as of 2001 as 1F. It has warmed significantly more since. Aerosols have not increased notably, and the 200 year sunspot cycle is in a cooling so the present warming is solidly GHG generated, according to the SCIENCE.
As to teachers, you may need one, as you seem somewhat juvenile. I have graduated long ago and I am quite capable of 'going to the source' science papers.

how much has it warmed since? and tell us what the start date was for this IPCC graph, and WHY they chose that year? The various cycles are just too complicated in their relationships for you, or the IPCC to work out, so you go to the easy answer. After all , the 3rd world can't get billions off the Sun or El Nino for spoiling their weather, can it?

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
The IPCC report stated the warming as of 2001 as 1F. It has warmed significantly more since.

When you choose to lie, you should really choose lies that are less blatant, or in any case not so trivial to refute.

Since 2001 warming has stalled. Slight ups and downs since then have been insignifigant noise or the effects of the nina-nino oscillation cancelling out over timeframes of two or three years.

pretty graphs of global temperature averages updated monthly:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnost...
http://tinyurl.com/cvnzt7

Look at the actual data before making absurd assertions.

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
I find the post interesting as it truly shows that you have earned you handle..'yernottoobright' would also do.

My handle? What the fk is a frush?

LessHypeMoreFact wrote:

<quoted text>
Giblets. You don't have to take EVERY opportunity to show your ignorance and stupidity. How about giving it a rest?

Then why do you?

You globies are the gas!!

Warmies just don't know when to let go:

1882 - 1910 Cooling
1910 - 1944 Warming
1944 - 1975 Cooling
1975 - 2001 Warming

In 2009 we are where the green arrow points in Figure 5, with temperature levelling off and beginning to fall slightly. The pattern suggests that the world has entered a period of cooling until about 2030.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php...

37 degrees in SW Fl. right now. If that isn't global warming I don't know what is. You globies are a riot!