Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York in 2010?

Judged:

2

2

2

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
What a useless putz, can you hold your breathe for an hour? No, well try anyway.

Judged:

1

1

1

One Who Knows wrote:

<quoted text>
You already answered this post once. Maybe you need to start keeping some kind of record of what you reply to since your short-term memory seems to be incapacitated.

Judged:

2

2

2

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry Mr. One, obama won, now everything is going to be fair,hahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMAO.

Judged:

2

2

2

Generations of Inbreeding wrote:

<quoted text>
You bet !
We're gonna 'fairly' shove it up the repuke's a$$es...FAIRLY !
You'll all get to take a turn, hillbilly !
ROFLMSLAO !

Judged:

3

3

3

One Who Knows wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's a fact for you - The October deficit is less than it was in October of 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Funny how that cut and paste article didn't mention that.
Fool. lol

Judged:

2

2

2

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
<golfclap>
All wholly unprecedented, unsustainable, and unacceptable levels of deficit.
And thus your facts and "point" = utterly worthless.
Again the fool.

Judged:

2

2

2

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry Mr. One, obama won, now everything is going to be fair,hahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMAO.

Judged:

4

4

3

Wake Up wrote:

Obama the tool of wall street.

Judged:

1

1

1

justicedenied13501 wrote:

Kirsten Gillibrand...just more rhetoric

Judged:

4

4

4

Bently Benard Baxter wrote:

<quoted text>here here

Judged:

4

4

4

Sour Graps wrote:

<quoted text>
SOUR GRAPES !
President Gillibrand '16 !

Judged:

5

5

4

Generation of Inbreeding wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, nice try, Hillbilly :
". Whenever an individual contributes to a campaign, they have to list their employer. This is the information that is used to summarize contributions from various companies and sectors. So if a bank teller contributes $50.00 to a campaign, its listed as part of the total for her bank as well as the financial sector as a whole.
4. Some individuals ask their friends/co-workers to make a contribution and "bundle" all of those checks together. Obama is the only candidate who reports the names of bundlers, where they work, and the total amount of their contribution.
One reason Obama's totals per company are much smaller than Romney's is that 46% of his contributions from these employees have been from what are considered "small donors,'(less than $200) whereas only 10% of Romney's fall in that category.
So the next time a poutrager tells you President Obama is beholden to Wall Street because they're funding his campaign - let them know that is complete bs."
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2011/10/t ...
In other wwords, Jethro......
Obama got contributions from all the PEONS that work at those companies on Walls Street (hoping Obama could deliver them from corporate greed)
whereas
Romney and his cronies got HIS wall street moneis from the upper echelons of these Wall Street thieves.
Apples and oranges, ya inbred mudderfugger !