Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Judged:

7

6

6

Ghaleon wrote:

<quoted text>
well since you live in Mexico why are even comeing on this forum and saying anything at all it's not like you matter anyway. You also lie all the time as well. You dont know what you are talking about. Someone is teaching you worng information and you listen to other people rather then learn anything your self. Your worse then a child most of the time.

Judged:

6

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
I am a opposite sex couple and I would be more than happy to give you equal rights under a civil union by any other name than marriage and most other straight couples feel the same....
Go find your own name for your abnormal union.....

Judged:

6

6

6

Ghaleon wrote:

<quoted text>
now how is that fair and equal ???? because you dont like something or you think have the right to tell people what words there allowed to use. Your a sad person

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you aware that still does not qualify gay couples for marriage?

Judged:

6

6

6

Ghaleon wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/11/mexi...
I'm trying to see the words civil union but i'm not can you pls post a link

Judged:

7

7

7

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>They have been getting married for EIGHT YEARS, KiMchi.

Judged:

6

6

6

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>99.9% of the time that people on the Internet brag about things like cars and houses, they in fact live in the basement of their mother. Much like you. Now just how does your financial status as a pimple faced wanker have anything to do with same sex marriage?

Judged:

6

6

6

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
"I am a opposite sex couple"?????????
WTF?
FYI.... you don't hold the trademark on the word marriage.

Judged:

6

6

6

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! That's a good one!!!! When you can prove that a contained system somehow produced additional water, that a 900 year old man built an ark and got penquins and kangaroos on it, that all those animals were able to be fed and walked everyday and their excriment all shoveled out of one window, and all the salt and fresh water fishes were able to mingle for a year, that all plant life was submerged for over a year, yet a fresh olive branch still existed....do let me know!!
My credibility is just fine compared to your Moses.
<quoted text>
yet you just called it credible!
<quoted text>
And fundies state that a magical Sky Santa created it because he was lonely and needed some human pets to give ridiculous rules to and obsess about what they do with their private parts. Private parts he could have easily created them without and saved HIMself all that worrying. Fundies state that the universe was fully developed in 6 days about 6000 years ago, and after that their supposedly omnipotent god had to take a breather. Sort of negates the whole omnipotence, don't you think?
Sorry hon, I won't be explaining the similarities to you, because there aren't any.
<quoted text>
Amino acids and dust aren't similar.
<quoted text>
Life, NOT humans. Humans did not begin as genderless. And according to your bible, humans started out as humans. Again, absolutely no "similarity".
I must say, I simply adore when you fundies deceitfully spin things in order to try and justify your Sky Santa manual.
<quoted text>
LOL!!! The bastard children of fallen angels and human women!! I see. So human life started when Adam and Eve (who apparantly had an unending supply of eggs) produced a bunch of children. Cain and Able did nothing because they had to wait for a full generation of their sisters to reach the age of puberty, and then for them to have sex with a bunch of fallen angels, and THEN wait again for THOSE children to reach the age of puberty so that they could then mate with the now middle aged original children of Adam and Eve!!!! Oh, you folks are a hoot!!
Tell me pooky, since you've already admitted that the Tanakh was never intended to be a science book, what credible reference material might I look into in order to verify the actual existence of the Nephilim? Or tell me what museum has some of their remains?
waiting.....
<quoted text>
Really? I don't remember reading that. Could you source it please? Oh, and when you do, can you verify that science has stated that the second vein is have angel? LOL!
<quoted text>
You might want to re-read your post again before referring to anyone else as an idiot.

Judged:

6

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
When the blacks were given equal rights did we change the meaning of white to include them???
Nope the word we used was human......
White still means white......

Judged:

7

6

6

Jonah1 wrote:

<quoted text>
What a load of horse shyt. Cut and paste baseless repetition is the sin qua non of idiots.

Judged:

6

6

6

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
When the blacks were given equal rights did we change the meaning of white to include them???
Nope the word we used was human......
White still means white......

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
First, try responding to me and not repeating gay talking points about the Bible that have nothing to do with what I said (If you can.).
Second, I'm not a fundie, which is why you have such a hard time dealing with me. I'm a barbarian cynic giving you nightmares.
Third, we have known about amino acid birth for just your lifetime. You know that for the previous 4000 years, "from the dust of the earth" made the most sense.
Fourth, if you condense the creation of humans down to one sentence, genderless to male/female is about as condensed as possible. What you are trying to avoid, is how in heaven a 4000 year old fiction book even comprehended pre-gender existence...
Didn't say 'sky angels' did it? If you really thought it was so ridiculous, why would you need to exaggerate? I'd say they were talking about alien visitation.
Look up Homo sapiens neanderthalensis & Homo sapiens sapiens. They are the two veins.

Judged:

7

7

7

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>SHAZAM I don't think that an inaugural address has any bearing on law. Who was the author of the US Constitution? If you care to check you will find that he took the bible and removed all traces of Jesus. You must be aware that many of the founding fathers where Deitists, they did not follow the tenets of Christianity. Read the Treaty of Tripoli article 11
Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Authored by American diplomat Joel Barlow in 1796, the following treaty was sent to the floor of the Senate, June 7, 1797, where it was read aloud in its entirety and unanimously approved. John Adams, having seen the treaty, signed it and proudly proclaimed it to the Nation. Law!!!!!!

Judged:

6

6

5

The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:

<quoted text>Perhaps you should consider relocating to a different beach. Oh one more thing if it where a woman jacking off a man would you allow your children to watch?

Judged:

6

5

5

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
When the blacks were given equal rights did we change the meaning of white to include them???
Nope the word we used was human......
White still means white......

Judged:

6

6

6

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure.......Not a problem......
Here is a english translation.......
A marriage in Mexico is legal only if it is a civil ceremony performed at a local Civil Register Office (Oficina del Registro Civil). You can have a religious ceremony later.

Judged:

6

5

5

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
My question is this.....WHAT FRUCKING BEACH IS HE TAKING HIS FAMILY TO? Never in my entire life HAVE I SEEN that sort of behavior taking place at the beach......park maybe....beach NEVER!!!
Hell, I guess in Here is One's eyes view that the women who skate down on the pier at Santa Monica with their thong bikini and a top that barely covers their nipples is perfectly okay for his children to see, right?

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Who said anything about 'law'.
I'm simply pointing out that in the Declaration, First Inaugural Address and countless other documents, God and Christianity were obviously considered. For that matter, the Bible was THE textbook for years in the first schools.

Judged:

6

6

5

RnL2008 wrote:

<quoted text>
My question is this.....WHAT FRUCKING BEACH IS HE TAKING HIS FAMILY TO? Never in my entire life HAVE I SEEN that sort of behavior taking place at the beach......park maybe....beach NEVER!!!
Hell, I guess in Here is One's eyes view that the women who skate down on the pier at Santa Monica with their thong bikini and a top that barely covers their nipples is perfectly okay for his children to see, right?