Chico State coed found dead was from San Jose

methprevention wrote:

What is Chico PD currently doing to find out who Gina was with during the prior 24 hours, what activities were they planning or had been to, could have someone put something in a unattended drink?

Ask wrote:

<quoted text>
Why don't you go down to the police station and ASK THEM?
Posting here isn't going to do any good.
Seriously. They're the only ones who can give you those answers.

methprevention wrote:

<quoted text>
...I even warned them about another student fatality. So since I have been asking questions about the prior 8 students who have died in 36 months why don't you go ask them some questions?...

SaneChicoan wrote:

<quoted text>
What exactly is your problem? Lacking a toxicology report, there is no evidence of anything. The cops are doing a fine job. People die every day from lots of things. Get over it.
My heart goes out to Gina's family.

methprevention wrote:

<quoted text>...so I'll get over it when Chico PD do their job. Someone knows what happened, what was the cause of Gina's death, without an investigation we will never know who that person or persons are. Who are the Police defending Gina or the people who may have provided what killed her?

Jesse wrote:

<quoted text>
What is your ax to grind with the cops? You're not about "methprevention," you're a ranting lunatic. Please save your crap until the tox report comes in. And even if this is OD, what makes you think "somebody knows"? You have zero idea, and zero business talking like you know what happened.

parentcollege student wrote:

chico state needs a big drug sweep done.. put the drug dealers who profit off our loss.. It is a on going problem on all college campus.. we as parents are the ones who lose and are very tired of it.. Live lost to never be again.. unbearable loss for any parent.. God Bless

methprevention wrote:

<quoted text> You say "The cops are doing a fine job." What is it exactly they are doing that is a fine job, please explain? From my research every time a student dies (8) in Chico over the last three years police state "nothing suspicious here". No evidence. Really. In this case one deceased 21 year old student with the rest of her life that was ahead of her lying on the floor and there is no evidence. What more evidence do they need to start an investigation? How many kids need to die from the same cause before it becomes suspicious. The past poly drug deaths were never investigated by Chico PD, their position is no crime, self induced overdose, no investigation, wait for the tox report, so I'll get over it when Chico PD do their job. Someone knows what happened, what was the cause of Gina's death, without an investigation we will never know who that person or persons are. Who are the Police defending Gina or the people who may have provided what killed her?

Good Lord wrote:

<quoted text>
So, if it's generally accepted that she accepted the drugs on her own will, didn't she accept the risk and responsibility associated with that choice? If so, why should we as taxpayers pay our incredibly under-staffed police force to "investigate" the death of someone who KNEW they could potentially die from doing what they did?

methprevention wrote:

<quoted text>
In the case of Gina Maggio there has not been a determination of what she died from to date. The Police when nothing suspicious was found at the scene in their eyes it is presumed a accidental death until the autopsy comes back with evidence that may indicate otherwise. With no investigation it is easy to assume it's accidental, leaves time for a coffee break too.
The answer to your question though assuming Gina did die from illicit drugs how does anyone know without a doubt that Gina took them willing or was slipped them through a drink. Only a quality police investigation could determine the answer to that question. Even if she did take them willingly shouldn't those selling deadly illicit drugs be accountable, or is it OK for scum to be ignored and continue selling, addicting and killing other adolescents and young adults.
In either case I know of few parents that would not want to know the truth and I know of even less individuals who do not want drug selling pukes put away for life.
Your analogy also falls short if you consider that everyone knows the danger of possibly being killed by a drunk driver. So from what you are saying the drunk driver should not be prosecuted because the person who was killed got behind the wheel knowing they could be killed.
As far as the Chico Police go if they were not so controlled and directed by being under the thumb of the University to focus on burning couches and promoting responsible drinking they could see the accumulation of dead students piling up from poly drug deaths and maybe investigate.