Romania Churches Divided Over 11-Year-Old's Abortion Approval

Does this really surprise anyone, that either happened?

Kerdy 1 wrote:

Does this really surprise anyone, that either happened?

what would you do?..make her have the child?

Hello

This is only one of two times that I agree with Abortion...

A.

Atheist wrote:

Hello
This is only one of two times that I agree with Abortion...
A.

me too..

its odd isnt it...the religious here probably think atheists are pro-abortion (ive no idea why they should think that..its like saying artists are pro-abortion..or football fans..or builders)..

..just one more thing they have no idea about..

A 11 year old child having a child? Which has more human rights? This 11 year old girl was the victim of rape and incest by her uncle. The real criminal is the uncle who raped his NIECE and got her pregnant. He is the one who should be made to pay for all of this mess.
This is one time I agree with a abortion.

hi.. i am a never say never kind of girl..i believe that i can not say what i would do in any circumstance..i am a mother of 7 ,5 are girls 4 of which are aged 10 and under..i can only imagine what i would do if this was to happen to any of my girls..and what i imagine would be abortion would be my first line of thought..i would have to seek the lords guidance in a real big way and have every confidence that he would take me through it and show me the correct path to take..i pray that this is one situation i NEVER have to experiance..also i judge not lest i be judged in the same manner

Kerdy 1 wrote:

Does this really surprise anyone, that either happened?

If you're that opposed to abortion, perhaps you could petition to have the 11 year old girl re-raped until she has a miscarriage.

See, talibangelical logic can always find a solution! Praiz!

I've never thought abortion was really a good idea, but I've always maintained that I don't really know if it's wrong either. So I pretty much have left it up to the individual to decide for themselved.

That being said, I can't imagine denying an 11 yr old rape victim this option.

There's just so much we don't know.. but either way, I hope this poor child finds a way to recovery.

Does not God open and close every womb?

in love
<><

writewingproxycontin wrote:

<quoted text>
If you're that opposed to abortion, perhaps you could petition to have the 11 year old girl re-raped until she has a miscarriage.
See, talibangelical logic can always find a solution! Praiz!

That was completely stupid. You must be related to tooeasilyfooled.

yankeeuk wrote:

A 11 year old child having a child? Which has more human rights? This 11 year old girl was the victim of rape and incest by her uncle. The real criminal is the uncle who raped his NIECE and got her pregnant. He is the one who should be made to pay for all of this mess.
This is one time I agree with a abortion.

It looks to me as though you want the unborn child to pay for all of this mess, not the uncle.

Make the uncle pay, by all means. Every penny of his money should go to the raising of the child, and to the payment of any physical or emotional problems endured by the child mother.

Jan wrote:

<quoted text>It looks to me as though you want the unborn child to pay for all of this mess, not the uncle.
Make the uncle pay, by all means.

You must have reading comprehension problems then. The original posted stated:

The real criminal is the uncle who raped his NIECE and got her pregnant. He is the one who should be made to pay for all of this mess.

An 11 year old is not physically able to give birth safely and suggesting she do so is inhumane.....but your type cares far more for a fetus than this little girl who's already been traumatized enough.

C Hamilton wrote:

<quoted text>You must have reading comprehension problems then. The original posted stated:
<quoted text>
An 11 year old is not physically able to give birth safely and suggesting she do so is inhumane.....but your type cares far more for a fetus than this little girl who's already been traumatized enough.

I do not have reading comprehension problems. You did not quote the final sentence of the post.

If the mother had an abortion, it would be the unborn child paying the ultimate price, whoever is held legally responsible for the mess.

Jan wrote:

<quoted text>I do not have reading comprehension problems. You did not quote the final sentence of the post.
If the mother had an abortion, it would be the unborn child paying the ultimate price, whoever is held legally responsible for the mess.

No, I'd say a raped 11 year old who is forced to carry a pregnancy to term is paying the ultimate price. You sure seem to care an aswful lot about bringing kids into the world but once they're here, to hell with them (as in this case).

C Hamilton wrote:

<quoted text>No, I'd say a raped 11 year old who is forced to carry a pregnancy to term is paying the ultimate price. You sure seem to care an aswful lot about bringing kids into the world but once they're here, to hell with them (as in this case).

Well put. its a known fact that most "pro lifers" are actually just "pro birth." They couldnt care less what happens after youre born, as long as you populate the earth further and fill the church pews on sunday.

C Hamilton wrote:

<quoted text>You must have reading comprehension problems then. The original posted stated:
<quoted text>
An 11 year old is not physically able to give birth safely and suggesting she do so is inhumane.....but your type cares far more for a fetus than this little girl who's already been traumatized enough.

Agree!

Jan wrote:

<quoted text>It looks to me as though you want the unborn child to pay for all of this mess, not the uncle.
Make the uncle pay, by all means. Every penny of his money should go to the raising of the child, and to the payment of any physical or emotional problems endured by the child mother.

How did you get I want the unborn child to pay for all this mess?????????? You are crazy. I have never said anything of that nature and I don't think that way. The uncle should be made to pay for his crime. I do not think the 11 year old girl should be made to raise that fetus. Nor the grandparents. If they had made the choice to let her go full term and give the fetus away..then fine. But that wasn't up to me.

Tell-It wrote:

<quoted text>
Well put. its a known fact that most "pro lifers" are actually just "pro birth." They couldnt care less what happens after youre born, as long as you populate the earth further and fill the church pews on sunday.

You're a sick and retarded individual, aren't you?

C Hamilton wrote:

<quoted text>You must have reading comprehension problems then. The original posted stated:
<quoted text>
An 11 year old is not physically able to give birth safely and suggesting she do so is inhumane.....but your type cares far more for a fetus than this little girl who's already been traumatized enough.

You use the word fetus like it's a dirty word. An unborn human child is probably no different to you than an unborn pup, is it? But I bet you would cry more over an aborted puppy than a human child, wouldn't you?

Wayne wrote:

<quoted text>
You use the word fetus like it's a dirty word. An unborn human child is probably no different to you than an unborn pup, is it? But I bet you would cry more over an aborted puppy than a human child, wouldn't you?

No, not really. How about showing some compassion for the 11 year old child. That's right, she's made it out of the womb so to hell with her.