Do you question evolution?
Posted in the Southern Baptist Forum
Find story here:
Before answering to the tune of “Anyone who questions it is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)” or “Question what? It is not even a theory” or, some such thing; keep in mind to always define your terms.
Do I question evolution? Changes within a species are obvious ie: dogs, horses, moths, finghes and observable. Change from one species to another species has not been observed. Change that supposes a lizard becoming a bird is ludicrus. Their is no fossil that shows such an occurence and none has ever been observed. I have never heard a good explanation from an evolutionest to account for the obvious symbiosis we see throughout nature. DNA is the answer to anyone that belives non life can produce life. Only life can produce life and to state otherwise is idiotic.
It seems some honest, open-minded research is needed here.
A wise man and prominent scientist named Theodosius Dobzhansky once said, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution."
Oh, and there's one more thing. He was a Christian.
His own words show how he walks, nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Christian walk by faith and not by sight(2Cor5:7). We are not to lean to our own understanding but in all our ways to acknowledge Him and He will lead our path(Pro 3:5-6) Death came because of the sin of Adam therefore evolution is impossible because it teaches many errors but death prior to the sin of Adam. How can a young man cleanse his way, by taking heed according to the word of God(Ps 119:9) God's word said He created all things by speaking them into existence so why call Him a liar if one claims He is omniscience? When someone takes mans word over God's word, they cannot at that point be following the Spirit of God because He would never lead someone to call God a liar.
No; it is stupid and shows one's ignorance. It is a theory. All say it is a theory. I shall stick with true science which I'll post. Read all. A secular science said: we have theories but fact is we can not show anything older than maybe 14,000 yrs.
Look closely: And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. 4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. Gen 1:3-5 (KJV) DAY ONE.
Now for Day four: And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years
Gen 1:14 (KJV)
Now for days 2 & 3: Jesus said He saw Lucifer fall and cast to earth. Lucifer's kingdom was reptiles and came with him a third part of Heaven. The reptiles of Lucifer's immediate kingdom went extinct from a great cataclysmic event. Absence of light and earth plates shifting with huge flooding sweeping, swirling, spinning dead bodies into a pool collecting in specific locations. We call them pools of oil.
Each year, water and winds erode about 25 billion tons of dirt and rock from the continents and deposit it in the ocean. This material accumulates as loose sediment (i.e. mud) on the hard basaltic (lava-formed) rock of the ocean floor. The average depth of all the mud in the whole ocean, including the continental shelves, is less than 400 meters. The main way currently known to remove the mud from the ocean floor is by plate tectonic subduction. That is, sea floor slides slowly (a few cm/year) beneath the continents, taking some sediment with it. According to secular scientific literature, that process presently removes only one billion tons per year. As far as anyone knows, the other 25 billion tons per year simply accumulate. At that rate, erosion would deposit the present amount of sediment in less than 12 million years. Yet according to evolutionary theory, erosion and plate subduction have been going on as long as the oceans have existed, an alleged three billion years. If that were so, the rates above imply that the oceans would be massively choked with mud dozens of kilometers deep. An alternative (creationist) explanation is that erosion from the waters of the Genesis Flood running off the continents deposited the present amount of mud within a short time about 5000 years ago.
The total energy stored in the Earth's magnetic field has steadily decreased by a factor of 2.7 over the past 1,000 years. Evolutionary theories explaining this rapid decrease, as well as how the Earth could have maintained its magnetic field for billions of years, are very complex and inadequate. A much better creationist theory exists. It is straightforward, based on sound physics, and explains many features of the field: its creation, rapid reversals during the Genesis Flood, surface intensity decreases and increases until the time of Christ, and a steady decay since then. This theory matches paleomagnetic, historic, and present data. The main result is that the field's total energy (not surface intensity) has always decayed at least as fast as now. At that rate the field could not be more than 10,000 years old.
According to evolutionists, Stone Age man existed for 100,000 years before beginning to make written records about 4,000–5,000 years ago. Prehistoric man built megalithic monuments, made beautiful cave paintings, and kept records of lunar phases. Why would he wait a thousand centuries before using the same skills to record history? The biblical time-scale is much more likely.
|BPC Names New President||Dec 4||GA Bap||1|
|why are southern baptists sooooo self-righteous? (Feb '11)||Dec 4||Bibleman||99|
|Southern Baptist Military Chaplains Prohibited ...||Nov 15||Liam R||135|
|Churches split on Scouts' stance on gays||Nov 12||The Real Deal||73|
|Changing view of Christianity||Nov 12||The Real Deal||178|
|Southern Baptists consider new name to broaden ... (Sep '11)||Nov '13||jhnsn d-s||7|
|Why do Southern Baptists dislike Catholics? (Feb '10)||Nov '13||The Real Deal||102|