Document 11Q13 Dead Sea Scrolls vindicates1844

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthcaller wrote:

FFUTS seems to think that lame jokes are somehow going to enhance his theological argumentation.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lay Worker wrote:

<quoted text>
All the readers have asked
"what theological argumentation was that anyway?"

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes! you are quite right there was an empty circle which was devoid of proper reasoning, add to that some lame jokes and false theology as well as insults and ecumenical alliances with a parasite laden buzzard posing as a Turkey as well as the seductive siren songs by way of the sweet chirp-er of love gospel apostasy who presented a song about a form of godliness which denies the power.

Judged:

1

1

1

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
Too many words spoil the thought.

Judged:

1

1

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
Well go ahead, tell us why you changed your name to Stuff? It is obvious that you weren't satisfied with your original occult concept. Notice that you also attacked EC's screen name but unlike you EC never changed his name out of fear or being ridiculed.

Judged:

1

1

1

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
The post quoted above is grammatically unsound and the fruit of an unsound mind.

Judged:

1

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
The thread is not about grammar and so far your theology has been very unsound. An unsound theology has its roots in circle spiritualism on account of the fact that rebellion against the High Priestly agenda of Jesus is as the sin of witch-craft. The fact that the circle's name was changed to another name reveals that there is an occult hidden agenda. EC has been accused of wrong grammar but the circle uses occult shape-shifting by changing from one name to another so that the roots of his unsound theology my not be discovered.
It was revealed that the circle as a concept dealt with the matter of the Noosphere a term which was coined in 1922 by a scholar of Meta-physics. No where are we told in the scriptures that God is a circle which denotes a pantheistic concept. The fact that this screen name was originally presented denotes the fact that the poster either utilized that meta-physical concept or has somehow been influenced by it even though he might not necessarily be a full blown pantheist.
Now let us see when one applies the concept to himself, does this then reveal that he himself is the circle? What does this mean? It means that Circle represents the Gnostic concept of a migration from the world of light into the darkness of the material word and then back to the light.

THIS IS A PURELY occult teaching!!

Judged:

2

1

1

Earthcaller wrote:

It means that Circle represents the Gnostic concept of a migration of the so-called soul of man from the world of light into the darkness of the material world and then back to the light thus completing the circle.

THIS IS A PURELY occult teaching.

Judged:

1

1

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
I couldn't agree more. It's what you're famous for.

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
EC didn't have to change his screen. It is obvious that you did it for some reason.

Judged:

1

1

1

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you schizophrenic?

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
I couldn't agree more. It's what you're famous for.

Judged:

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
No not quite but you have become Tri-phrenic since you are Circle, Stuff and Better stuff. I guess your up and coming fourth personality will convert you into a Quadriphrenic.

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
You repeated 917 and 918 saying the same thing, this is a definite sign of obsessive compulsive behavior.

Judged:

1

1

1

Better stuff wrote:

<quoted text>
You're obviously in need of therapy.

Judged:

2

2

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
You need a better line then that its below average as a rebuttal.
1)My rebuttal is for you to explain from the Bible why the original dictum is incorrect? I have presented evidence which proves that the Atonement in the Old Testament was dual, there was a daily individual and corporate forgiveness and once a year a cleansing of the Sanctuary.
2) Matthew 5: 17,18,19 states that Jesus came to fulfill the Old Testament law and the Prophets not to abolish.
3) Jesus fulfilled the perfect sacrifice for all the agendas of the Sanctuary as stated it is finished.
4) Jesus began fulfilling the High Priestly ministration which was not a part of item 3. See Hebrews 6:19-20.
Stuff has not been able to prove the contrary from Scripture. Hebrews 6:19-20 is the definitive verse which shows that the commencement of the HP ministration began upon entrance into the Holy places in the heavens.
5) Stuff has not been able to disprove the fact that Revelation 1,2,3 is the anti-typical fulfillment of Leviticus 4:13 specifically verse 18 for 4 main reasons.
A) Jesus is dressed as High Priest in Revelation 1, and
B) he is ministering corporate repentance by way of calling the churches to repentance.
C)the 7 Lamp-stands clearly provide Holy Place symbolism.
D) the messages are to the churches (corporate entities) on account of the fact that at the end of each letter we see the statement, "he who has ears, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches".
Rev 1,2,3 clearly follows the dictum and presents the fulfillment of Leviticus 4:13 as a High priestly ministration agenda upon entrance into heaven.
6) Stuff has not been able to refute the fact that the Day of A was the Day of Judgement to the Jewish mind and Daniel 7 clearly presents this concept which is clearly revealed in the New Testament in 1 Peter 4:17 and Rev 14:6,7.
7) Stuff is now clearly in trouble on account of the fact that he is calling Jesus a liar and he cannot explain how Jesus will fulfill the anti-typical Day of A which is clearly presented in Hebrews 9:26 from the context of verses 23,24,25. The verses are clearly alluding to the Final Atonement on account of the fact that they are addressing the issue of the final elimination of sin by way of the perfect sacrifice which is used as stated in the text itself during the consummation of the ages but from the context of that entrance into the Holy Places in the heavens as stated in Hebrews 9:23,24,25. The context of these verses is not the cross but the High Priestly ministration which utilizes the perfect sacrifice to finally eradicate sin. This takes place at the end of time as stated in Zachariah as well as Revelation 15:8 and Revelation 22:11

Judged:

2

2

1

Earthcaller wrote:

<quoted text>
You need a better line then that its below average as a rebuttal.
1)My rebuttal is for you to explain from the Bible why the original dictum is incorrect? I have presented evidence which proves that the Atonement in the Old Testament was dual, there was a daily individual and corporate forgiveness and once a year a cleansing of the Sanctuary.
2) Matthew 5: 17,18,19 states that Jesus came to fulfill the Old Testament law and the Prophets not to abolish.
3) Jesus fulfilled the perfect sacrifice for all the agendas of the Sanctuary as stated it is finished.
4) Jesus began fulfilling the High Priestly ministration which was not a part of item 3. See Hebrews 6:19-20.
Stuff has not been able to prove the contrary from Scripture. Hebrews 6:19-20 is the definitive verse which shows that the commencement of the HP ministration began upon entrance into the Holy places in the heavens.
5) Stuff has not been able to disprove the fact that Revelation 1,2,3 is the anti-typical fulfillment of Leviticus 4:13 specifically verse 18 for 4 main reasons.
A) Jesus is dressed as High Priest in Revelation 1, and
B) he is ministering corporate repentance by way of calling the churches to repentance.
C)the 7 Lamp-stands clearly provide Holy Place symbolism.
D) the messages are to the churches (corporate entities) on account of the fact that at the end of each letter we see the statement, "he who has ears, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches".
Rev 1,2,3 clearly follows the dictum and presents the fulfillment of Leviticus 4:13 as a High priestly ministration agenda upon entrance into heaven.
6) Stuff has not been able to refute the fact that the Day of A was the Day of Judgement to the Jewish mind and Daniel 7 clearly presents this concept which is clearly revealed in the New Testament in 1 Peter 4:17 and Rev 14:6,7.
7) Stuff is now clearly in trouble on account of the fact that he is calling Jesus a liar and he cannot explain how Jesus will fulfill the anti-typical Day of A which is clearly presented in Hebrews 9:26 from the context of verses 23,24,25. The verses are clearly alluding to the Final Atonement on account of the fact that they are addressing the issue of the final elimination of sin by way of the perfect sacrifice which is used as stated in the text itself during the consummation of the ages but from the context of that entrance into the Holy Places in the heavens as stated in Hebrews 9:23,24,25. The context of these verses is not the cross but the High Priestly ministration which utilizes the perfect sacrifice to finally eradicate sin. This takes place at the end of time as stated in Zachariah as well as Revelation 15:8 and Revelation 22:11

Lay Worker wrote:

<quoted text>
'Remains' unanswered