codex sinaiticus - 1,600 yrs bible doesn't mention Jesus Christ only IUXU

Aten Ra, Aten Re I agree with you is not true monolithic, but you must take away the Ra and Re as they are associated with pagan idols. True monolithic is just Aten, Aton. Ra and Re are just descriptive term to emphasize rays of light. Aten is living light not just from sun but all light including souls.

Show prove Aten isn't monolithic interested to see

Now, to be fair, the gospels were not deliberately given false names. They were all written anonymously and the names were assigned much later by people who only had stories and legends to use to assign authorship. "Luke" appears to have been written by the same person who wrote Acts, and it seems to have been someone who may have accompanied Paul at one time, and Paul was accompanied by someone named Luke, so let's call this gospel "Luke". The other gospels are even worse, so far as being able to know who really wrote them. The one thing that CAN be safely stated is that NONE of the authors was a disciple of Jesus: they were all illiterate peasants.

Matthew the tax collector MIGHT have been high enough up the hierarchy that he could manage a few simple words or names, or he could have just been like the majority of tax collectors back then: a thug with a badge (as it were). But NONE of them would have been able to compose Greek writings such as we see in the gospels.

In an earlier post, I added a link to a book called "Misquoting Jesus". Delightful book. It shows how the NT has been changed over the years and talks about WHY it happened. I strongly recommend that you read it along with the author's other books as well.

So the all we have to do is find out when meteor and artemis where revered.
And when it was nicked to be installedin the kaaba.
---
Aten...i showed a piece of writing that pointed to family interest as in revering the family-name Aten as land plus pharao thus godking.
Adding a new god.(As happened before, animal characteristics arethe gods of old, while those with human faces and bodies are of a younger time.
Those with a animal headdress are intermediate ot ptolomaic grabbing back to older traditions they did not have as being foreigners in the land.

Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
The evidence you ask for is here:
http://www.amazon.com/Misquoting-Jesus-Story -...
And yes, some of the passages have indeed changed a lot. Like the ending to the gospel of Mark. The original ending was at 16:8, the women fled and didn't say a word. The end. Verses 9 through 20 are not found in the earliest manuscripts
.
{I wouldn't believe anything Bart Ehrman writes. Here is an example of his thinking: http://wellthoughtoutlife.blogspot.ca/2011/10 ...
} quote from M114

Books and writers to be explored.

rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:

leave a whole bunch of possibiities.

Congradulations good to see you are more normal now!:) Be more constructive as you have good knowledge.

I was not surprised whatsoever.lol
An interesting and at times amusing read.
A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF CONTINUED EXISTENCE AFTER PHYSICAL DEATH.
Alan Baldwin.
http://www.angmalta.net/clients/alan/existenc ...
It's a pdf, hope you can open it.

http://www.angmalta.net/clients/alan/existenc...
copying just the post left us with hald an address.

You can worship Yahshua, but do it all in vain. Yahshua said so! Notice:
"But in vain they do worship ME (Yahshua), teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." (Matt. 15:9)

Lugh as i recall also had something to do with luck, or chance.
Meni could be Manat, the goddess of fate.

I looked matt 15:9 up and he is referring as to what e??? a prophet (did they make that esaue or esaie,??)had predicted about waht would happen with the pharizees later.
Ridicoulous.

From the nasa site, an easy answer (no universes in universes etc)
In the case of a black hole, the Schwarzschild radius is mathematically the radius in at which one would have to be moving at the speed of light in order to escape. Or, the radius that nothing can escape. This is only a function of the mass -- not the density.

Putting the numbers in, the Schwarzschild radius (Rsch) is given by:

Rsch = 3km x Mass; Where the Mass is measured in solar masses.

Now, when do we get a black hole? Answer, when the Schwarzschild radius is bigger than the object we think might make a black hole.

The Sun (Mass = 1 solar mass) is not a black hole because it is bigger than 3 km. If we magically shrunk in down to 3km in radius, then it would become a black hole.

Now back to your question: Why then was the early Universe not a black hole? Well, lets figure out its Schwarzschild radius to get a basic rule of thumb idea of what is going on.

Rsch = 3km x Mass of the whole Universe in solar masses
= about 10 to 100 billion light years
= about the current size of the whole Universe

So, in the basic definition of a black hole I used above (where the size of the object is smaller than the Schwarzschild radius) the whole Universe is one big black hole with us on the inside.

Therefore, the simple answer is that we are inside the event horizon of the whole Universe, and there is no way that we can escape the Universe's grasp.

"OH JEHOVA, quam ampla sunt opera Tua."
– Carolus Linnaeus
at the beginning of Systema Naturae, 1757

10 vai·yik·ra e·lo·him lai·yab·ba·shah e·retz u·le·mik·veh ham·ma·yim ka·ra yam·mim vai·yar· e·lo·him ki-to·vv.

Laighipda etsokik kaighachchahak edeb utsekiplek kakkaghik pada ghakkik laighad etsokik pivoll 

Moving to be brought together wormwood life global countrymen life anger indeed to witness green shoots to make haste as much as possible to collapse how darkness to capturing and detaining globally redemption global fireplace live report moving as far as wormwood mouth 

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/judaism/T...
The Krijbolder book.Short.

tangled bank wrote:
<quoted text>
The term in the Hebrew book of Job is clearly "The Satan," with the definite article. In the early Biblical books, such as Samuel and Numbers (say, before 1000 BC), "the satan" is the foe, the adversary. By Zechariah, around 520 BC, "the satan" seems to be a superhuman opponent, and by the book of Chronicles (perhaps 400 BC), "Satan" has become a proper noun and the definite article is dropped. In the book of Job, there is implication that "the Satan" is one of the heavenly host.
This internal timeline places Job around 520 - 400 BC.
As previously stated - the dating of the book of Job is quite uncertain - with dates range from 1500 BCE - 400 BCE. So Anaximander's "hanging earth theory" (~570 BCE) is a comparable thought within an accepted time range of the book of Job.
saturday may 5th, just reading 'down'.

Originally it is thought that the book of Job , just contained chapters 1, 2 -2:11 than skips everything to end with 42:12-16.
We find in the rest of the text some (might just have been one) early 'arabic'derived words.
So that would explain some later greek/persian influence and ideas.

An interesting read/ gathered ideas:
http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/39_bereshiyt.ht...

Of note: For all the articles it is mainly using the derived old testament and gospel and not as we would think reading 'ancient hebrew' the actual text in hebrew, though it sometimes refers.

Interesting about the ten commandments

(Ex. 31:18) upon two “tablets of stone” made of blue sapphire as a symbol of the heavens and God's throne. According to rabbinic tradition they were perfect cubes, with the letters bored fully through the stone (Ex. 32:15). This was a miracle, since the inner part of the Samekh “floated” in place.

Also in hermetic philosophy they mention the 10 commandments of two emerald stones.

Would that be the first version G-d made or the second version Moses made.
Rethorical.
Moses must have been pretty amazing then!
Sapphire colour, or stone v. emerald. Different properties.

proto evangelium james...the mary narrative prevalent in eastern churches, not included in the western-church. trial by marah as an eastern tradition.
https://docs.google.com/viewer...

Jerusalem temple: Untill 60 CE only the holy place for burnt-offerings was accessible not the holy of holies (where the highpriest would go ones a year)
so mary in the holy of holies is pretty unlikely.
But then xianity got a lot of things wrong.
http://religiousstudies.uncc.edu/people/jtabo...

We burned every book, scroll and writing we could lay our hands on:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/archive/ind...

Pseudo-Aristotle (Plato maybe) on virtues and vices.
The tripartite soul:
http://www.ldysinger.com/ @texts/0-035_aristotle/04_ps-a r_vir-vic.htm