Mohammad The Anti Christ

"Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also. See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain IN the Son and IN the Father." 1 John 2:22-24

The MAN IS MOHAMMAD --- the identification coming from Gematria, the ancient Hebrew science which assigns numerical values to words.

In Gematria, the value of a word is determined by adding the numerical equivalents of the individual letters that form it. Here, then, are the steps necessary for identifying Mohammed as the "name" and "number" of the beast:

The simplest phonetic transcription of the word 'Mohammed' is:

(1) M O H A M E D

In ancient Hebrew, the closest counterparts of those sounds are:

(2) Mem Waw Hey Aleph Mem Yod Dalet

The proper character representation for the word Mohammed in John's Vision is:

(3)

Note: John thought, understood, and "saw" in Hebrew (written from right to left). However, he transcribed his vision into Greek (written from left to right). Hence the reason for the so-called "final Mem" (the representation of Mem when it ends a word) being used in the beginning place here.

In Gematria, the numerical equivalents of the above characters are, respectively:

(4) 600 6 5 1 40 10 4

(5) The sum of the above numbers is 666, or "Six hundred threescore and six."

(Please read Section 8, entitled Answers to Possible Questions, for additional comments concerning this transliteration and its numerical values as well as interpretation.)

Mohammed = 666

Ancient tablet spurs debate on story of resurrection

Ethan Bronner, Jerusalem
July 7, 2008
The latest archeological find has shocked many scholars and scientists alike.

A METRE-HIGH tablet with 87 lines of Hebrew that scholars believe dates from the decades just before the birth of Jesus is causing a stir in biblical and archaeological circles because it may speak of a messiah who will rise from the dead after three days.

If such a messianic description really is there, it will contribute to a developing re-evaluation of both popular and scholarly views of Jesus, because it suggests the story of his death and resurrection was not unique but part of a recognised Jewish tradition at the time.

The tablet, probably found near the Dead Sea in Jordan, is a rare example of a stone with ink writings from that era — in essence, a Dead Sea Scroll on stone. It is written, not engraved, across two neat columns, similar to columns in a Torah. But the stone is broken and some of the text is faded, meaning that much of what it says is open to debate.

Still, its authenticity has so far faced no challenge, so its role in helping to understand the roots of Christianity in the devastating political crisis faced by the Jews of the time seems likely to grow.

Daniel Boyarin, a professor of Talmudic culture at the University of California at Berkeley, said the stone was part of a growing body of evidence suggesting that Jesus could be best understood through a close reading of the Jewish history of his day.

"Some Christians will find it shocking — a challenge to the uniqueness of their theology — while others will be comforted by the idea of it being a traditional part of Judaism," Professor Boyarin said.

Given the highly charged atmosphere surrounding all Jesus-era artefacts and writings, both in the general public and in the scholarly community, as well as the concern over forgery and charlatanism, it will probably be some time before the tablet's contribution is fully assessed.

It has been about 60 years since the Dead Sea Scrolls were uncovered, and they continue to generate controversy over their authors and meaning.

The scrolls contain some of the only known surviving copies of biblical writings from before the first century AD.

A conference marking 60 years since the discovery of the scrolls began yesterday at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem, where the stone and the debate over whether it speaks of a resurrected messiah, as one iconoclastic scholar believes, were also due to be discussed.

NEW YORK TIMES

http://www.theage.com.au/world/ancient-tablet ...

Sound Doc wrote:

"Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also. See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain IN the Son and IN the Father." 1 John 2:22-24

John, the pot-smoker living on an island, wrote too much absurdity. John, the man who penned his gospel was a lunatic who rebelled against the three othe rmen who penned their own gospels.

The number 666 is the mathematical work out for a goat or a lamb. 600 for g or l, 0 for o or a, 0 for a and m and 66 for t or b. The total is 666. lol! The founders of Christianity could not count more than 72. Rotfl.

As far as the Anti-Christ is concerned, Peter, Judas, Thomas were the first Anti-Christ. Every Christian is also an Anti-Christ, because he or she works against Jesus, the man, son of Mary.

All turned him into a lesser god by reducing him to a third and the poor man, his father and the ghost were reduced to fraction 33.33333% each with a short fall of 0.0001.

The Anti-Christ, if you read carefully, is in fact
the Clergy of the pagan Gentile church founded by the pagan Gentiles of the 4th Century.

An average gullible Christian may not understand above but Thomas Jefferson, the man, who trimmed the New Testament by reducing it to a few pages,
observed that the Clergy was the Anti-Christ and he agrees with me. Please see for yourself what Jefferson said:

"The clergy converted the simple teachings of Jesus into an engine for enslaving mankind and adulterated by artificial constructions into a contrivance to filch wealth and power themselves...these clergy, in fact, constitute the real Anti-Christ."

Cheers

BMZ wrote:

<quoted text>
John, the pot-smoker living on an island, wrote could not count more than 72. Rotfl.
As far as the Anti-Christ is the New Testament by reducing it to a few pages,
observed that the Clergy was the Anti-Christ and he agrees with me. Please see for yourself what Jefferson said:
<quoted text>
Cheers

Ah yes the founder of Islam,,,The beauty of Islam;
Kinana b. al-Rabi`, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-`Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has," so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud.(Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, translated as, The Life of Muhammad,(tr. A. Guillaume), Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 515.)
Mohammad is a brute a beast. He did not just kill to make better changes in the world, He enjoyed torture and murdering like satan.
Jesus never did such cruelty, He prayed for his enemies and taught us to also. He never killed anyone rather he raised the dead, and healed the sick. Mohammad had no compassion or mercy. Lu 6:35 "But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil.

BMZ.. You will need more proof of Mohammad's evil vileness against one man he tortured to force him to give him the treasure, so here;

The oldest extant biography of Muhammad is called the "Sirat Rasulallah" — "Life of the Prophet of Allah". This book was written by Ibn Ishaq, a devout Muslim scholar, and later revised by Ibn Hisham. It was written before any of the major works of Hadith. It is considered the most authentic biography of Muhammad. It was translated into English by A. Guillaume as "The Life of Muhammad".





page 515 reads:



"Kinana al-Rabi, who had the custody of the treasure of Banu Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (Tabari says "was brought"), to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" He said "Yes". The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr Al-Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has." So he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud."

Sound Doc wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes the founder of Islam,,,The beauty of Islam;
Kinana b. al-Rabi`, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, "Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?" he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-`Awwam, "Torture him until you extract what he has," so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud.(Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, translated as, The Life of Muhammad,(tr. A. Guillaume), Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 515.)
Mohammad is a brute a beast. He did not just kill to make better changes in the world, He enjoyed torture and murdering like satan.
Jesus never did such cruelty, He prayed for his enemies and taught us to also. He never killed anyone rather he raised the dead, and healed the sick. Mohammad had no compassion or mercy. Lu 6:35 "But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil.

"enjoyed torture and murdering like satan."
yes that is NT
NT
Revelation 2
21I have given her time to repent of her immorality, but she is unwilling. 22So I will cast her on a bed of suffering, and I will make those who commit adultery with her suffer intensely, unless they repent of her ways. 23I will strike her children dead. Then all the churches will know that I am he who searches hearts and minds, and I will repay each of you according to your deeds

The Crucified Messiah Scroll

In 1991 the world was astonished to hear that one of the unpublished scrolls included incredible references to a "Messiah" who suffered crucifixion for the sins of men. The scroll was translated by Dr. Robert Eisenman, Professor of Middle East Religions of California State University. He declared, "The text is of the most far-reaching significance because it shows that whatever group was responsible for these writings was operating in the same general scriptural and Messianic framework of early Christianity." Although the original scroll team still claimed that there was no evidence about early Christianity in the unpublished scrolls, this new scroll totally contradicted their statements. This single scroll is earth-shaking in its importance. As Dr. Norman Golb, Professor of Jewish History at the University of Chicago said, "It shows that contrary to what some of the editors said, there are lots of surprises in the scrolls, and this is one of them."

This remarkable five-line scroll contained fascinating information about the death of the Messiah. It referred to "the Prophet Isaiah" and his Messianic prophecy (Chapter 53) that identified the Messiah as one who will suffer for the sins of his people. This scroll provides an amazing parallel to the New Testament revelation that the Messiah would first suffer death before He would ultimately return to rule the nations. Many scholars believed that the Jews during the first century of our era believed that, when he finally came, the Messiah would rule forever without dying. The exciting discovery of this scroll reveals that the Essene writer of this scroll understood the dual role of the Messiah as Christians did. This scroll identified the Messiah as the "Shoot of Jesse" (King David's father) the "Branch of David," and declared that he was "pierced" and "wounded." The word "pierced" remind us of the Messianic prophecy in Psalms 22:16: "They pierced my hands and feet." The prophet Jeremiah (23:5) said, "I will raise unto David a righteous branch."

The scroll also describes the Messiah as a "leader of the community" who was "put to death." This reference pointing clearly to the historical Jesus of Nazareth is creating shock waves for liberal scholarship that previously assumed that the Gospel account about Jesus was a myth. Jesus is the only one who ever claimed to be the Messiah who was crucified. The genealogies recorded in both Matthew and Luke's Gospels, reveal that Jesus was the only one who could prove by the genealogical records kept in the Temple that He was the lineage of King David as the "Son of Jesse." Since the tragic destruction of the Temple and its records in A.D. 70 it would be impossible for anyone else to ever prove their claim to be the Messiah based on their genealogical descent from King David. Additionally, the scroll identified the Messiah as "the sceptre" which probably refers to the Genesis 49:10 prophecy, "The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be." This scroll confirms the historical truthfulness of the New Testament record about Jesus and His crucifixion. The evidence from the scroll suggests that the Jewish Essene writer acknowledged that Jesus of Nazareth was the "suffering Messiah" who died for the sins of His people.

The "Son of God" Scroll

Another fascinating scroll discovered in Cave Four known as 4Q246 refers to the hope of a future Messiah figure. This is another of the scrolls that was unpublished until recently. Amazingly, the text in this scroll refers to the Messiah as "the son of God" and the "son of the Most High." These words are the exact wording recorded in the Gospel of Luke.

The Text of Scroll 4Q246 - the Son of God Scroll:

"He shall be called the son of God,
and they shall designate [call] him son of the Most High.
Like the appearance of comets, so shall be their kingdom.
For brief years they shall reign over the earth and shall trample on all;
one people shall trample on another and
one province on another until the people of God shall rise and all shall rest from the sword."

Compare the words in the scroll 4Q246 text to the inspired words found in Luke 1:32 and 35: "He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David... And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God" (Luke 1:32-35).

Anyone comparing these two first century texts will be startled by the amazing similarity of concept and wording describing the Messianic leader. One of the great differences between Christian and Jewish conceptions of the promised Messiah revolves around His relationship to God. While the Jews believe the Messiah will be a great man, such as Moses, with a Divine mission, the Christians believe that the Bible teaches that the Messiah would be uniquely "the Son of God." The Jewish view usually held that the concept of a "son of God" violated the primary truth of monotheism found in Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord." The Christians believed that Jesus' claim to be the Son of God was not a violation of Deuteronomy 6:4. Rather, Christians believe in the Trinity, the doctrine that the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are revealed in the Bible to be One God, revealed in three personalities. As Christians, we do not believe in three separate gods. Therefore, Christians understand the statements about Jesus as the Son of God to be in complete conformity to the truth of monotheism - there is only one God. It is fascinating in this regard to consider the presence of these statements in this first century Jewish text: "He shall be called the son of God, and they shall designate [call] him son of the Most High."

The presence of these statements in the Dead Sea Scrolls suggests that some of the Essenes either accepted the Messianic claims of Jesus to be the Son of God or anticipated this concept. Either possibility opens up new areas for exploration. Another possibility that must be considered is this: Is it possible that this scroll 4Q246 is a direct quote from the writer hearing the words of the Gospel of Luke that was now widely circulating according to early Christian witnesses? Luke, the physician, claimed that he wrote the Gospel of Luke as an eyewitness of the events he personally observed. In Luke 1:1-3, he says: "Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us, Even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word; It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus."

The discovery of the virtually identical wording "the Son of God" from Luke 1:32 and 35 with the scroll found buried in a cave in A.D. 68 stands as a tremendous witness to the early existence and transmission of the Gospel records within thirty-five years of Christ. If the Gospels were written and distributed within thirty-five years of the events of the life of Jesus (as the Gospels claim) then they stand as the best eyewitness historical records we could ever hope to possess. It would be almost impossible to distribute the Gospel accounts to thousands of people in Israel within three and a half decades of the events unless they were true accounts. If the Gospel records were untrue, many witnesses would have stood up and denied their accuracy. However, the records of the first century reveal that no one denied the facts about the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus. In fact, all of these ancient historical records confirm the truth of the Gospels.

Other New Testament Quotes Identified in the Scrolls

In 1971, a Spanish biblical scholar named Jose O'Callaghan studied some of the small fragments of scrolls discovered in Cave Seven at Qumran. He was looking for correspondences between these fragments of Greek scrolls and the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament that was widely used by Jesus and the apostles.

These fragments are quite small containing only small portions of each verse. After almost two thousand years, the elements and insects have significantly damaged these manuscripts. In some cases only small fragments containing parts of a verse on three or four lines remain from an original scroll. It required considerable detective work to determine the precise text in these tiny fragments.

hihihihihih halfwits plenty hehehehehehe

To his amazement Dr. O'Callaghan found that these Greek language fragments bore an uncanny resemblance to several verses in the New Testament. He read the Greek words "beget" and a word that could be "Gennesaret," a word for the Sea of Galilee. The fragment containing "Gennesaret" appears to be a quotation of the passage referring to the feeding of the five thousand found in Mark 6:52,53 which states: "For they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened. And when they had passed over, they came into the land of Gennesaret, and drew to the shore."
They are the earliest New Testament texts ever discovered. The New York Times responded, " It proves that at least one of the Gospels, that of St. Mark, was written only a few years after the death of Jesus." The Los Angeles Times headlined, "Nine New Testament fragments dated A.D. 50 to A.D. 100 have been discovered in a Dead Sea Cave." It stated that [they] constitute the most sensational biblical trove uncovered in recent times."
Other Scroll Fragments and the New Testament
Dr. Jose O'Callaghan ultimately identified eight different scroll fragments from Cave Seven that appear to be quotes from New Testament passages. The fragments appeared to O'Callaghan to be portions of the following verses from the Gospels and Paul's Epistles:
"For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself..." (Mark 4:28).
"And he saw them toiling in rowing; ..." (Mark 6:48).
"And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar..." (Mark 12:17)
"And when they had eaten enough, they lightened the ship..." (Acts 27:38).
"And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ..." (Romans 5:11-12).
"And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness..." (1 Timothy 3:16).
"For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer..." (James 1:23-24).
As one example of Dr. O'Callaghan's study, he examined a small scroll fragment known as 7Q5 that contained only twenty Greek letters on five lines of text. Many of the thousands of scroll fragments that were successfully identified from the Qumran site are equally small. Another scroll scholar, Carsten Thiede, agrees with O'Callaghan that portions of the Mark 6:52,53 passage appears in this scroll fragment. While other scroll scholars disagree with the identification of this fragment as a verse from the New Testament they do admit that almost all of the scrolls found in Cave Seven were written in the period between 50 B.C. and A.D. 50, which is consistent with the time of the writing of the Gospel of Mark.
More work needs to be done. However, the recent publication of the discovery of Scroll 4Q246 and its identical reference to "the Son of God" as found in Luke 1:32 and 35 provide strong support for the possibility that these fragments are related to these New Testament passages.
When we consider the total amount of evidence that confirms the biblical record about Jesus of Nazareth we can have confidence that we know more about the life and resurrection of Christ than we know about any other person in the ancient world. God has not left us in darkness concerning the truthfulness of the miracles, prophecies and teaching of His Son, Jesus Christ. Now we have confidence we are forgiven, and He manifests that truth to us .
Ro 8:16 The Spirit Himself (comforter) bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,

hihihihihih halfwits plenty hihihihihih halfwits plenty hehehehehehehehehehehehe

Sound Doc wrote:

"Who is the liar? It is the man who denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a man is the antichrist—he denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father; whoever acknowledges the Son has the Father also. See that what you have heard from the beginning remains in you. If it does, you also will remain IN the Son and IN the Father." 1 John 2:22-24
The MAN IS MOHAMMAD --- the identification coming from Gematria, the ancient Hebrew science which assigns numerical values to words.
In Gematria, the value of a word is determined by adding the numerical equivalents of the individual letters that form it. Here, then, are the steps necessary for identifying Mohammed as the "name" and "number" of the beast:
The simplest phonetic transcription of the word 'Mohammed' is:
(1) M O H A M E D
In ancient Hebrew, the closest counterparts of those sounds are:
(2) Mem Waw Hey Aleph Mem Yod Dalet
The proper character representation for the word Mohammed in John's Vision is:
(3)
Note: John thought, understood, and "saw" in Hebrew (written from right to left). However, he transcribed his vision into Greek (written from left to right). Hence the reason for the so-called "final Mem" (the representation of Mem when it ends a word) being used in the beginning place here.
In Gematria, the numerical equivalents of the above characters are, respectively:
(4) 600 6 5 1 40 10 4
(5) The sum of the above numbers is 666, or "Six hundred threescore and six."
(Please read Section 8, entitled Answers to Possible Questions, for additional comments concerning this transliteration and its numerical values as well as interpretation.)

Do you want to mean that as 666 somehow related with Muhammad (p)and thats why he is anti-christ ?

Islam - the religion of war, martyrdom, honor killings...

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Messiah scroll, this scroll and that scroll. It is all crap.

The Jews do not find Jesus in any scroll, while the Christians find Jesus in every son, it, he, him and himself. lol!

Thank God, the Muslims are free of those chip-sized, credit-card size fragments and other torn and tattered scrolls.

Theer deos not exist any original of any scroll. lol

Cheers

Muhammad the Anti-Christ

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Islam the Antichrist Religion

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The Prophet Muhammed could not have been a prophet of God

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

!!!VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE!!!

The following discussion is carried out for the central figure of pagan Christianity , called Jesus . In Islam the honorable prophet Isa Ibn Marium (peace be upon him) as depicted in Qur’an is amply different character than the pagan god Jesus as depicted in New Testament. Moreover the ‘666 ‘sign of Christianity has no significance in Islam. Hence ‘666’ doesn’t effect in any belief of Islam positively or adversely.

****** JESUS=666 *******

The mark of beast / antichrist/Lucifer in Christianity is ‘666’ which is written in Book of Revelation , chapter 13 , verse 18 . Christian seeks pleasure to relate this number with others and addressed him/it as antichrist/Satan/Lucifer . But in this topix , we will see how this evil number is related astonishingly with Jesus Christ himself .

01-

Lets read the verse in English :
Revelation 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six.
In Greek they use letters Instead of numbers. The number 666 is represented by the Greek letters Chi, Xi and Sigma . The value of these letters :

600 = Chi
60 = Xi
6 = Sigma
---------- TOTAL = 666

The title of Jesus is Christ , which in Greek is ‘CHrEstoS’. The first letter of ‘CHrEstoS’ is Chi (600), the last letter is Sigma (6) and the middle letter is E looks like Xi , a curled E or the serpent (symbol of Satan according to Genesis 3:45 etc.) whose value is 60 . Hence in the title of Jesus we found the mark ‘666’.

02-

In Greek, the first of these three letters, Chi (X), also takes the sound of a 'Z'- as in Xenephen or Xylophone.
The first and last Greek letters of this 666 formula, may therefore also be referring to the first and last letters of the name 'ZeuS'.
Scripture itself bears testimony to this interpretation in Luke 4:27 in the KJV translation - where the name of the prophet Elisha (meaning 'My God is Saviour') has been retained in the paganised form 'Eliseus'(My god is Zeus). In similar fashion, the Name of the Hebrew Messiah YAHU'SHUAH (meaning 'YAHU is Saviour') has been paganised to read 'JeZeus',('God is Zeus') which later became 'Jesus' in the English language (pronounced 'Jezus').

For further details on the Sacred Names, refer to:
http://www.revelations.org.za/NotesS-Name.htm

03- There are three ‘SIX’ in the beast mark 666 . Now SIX = S (initial of serpent and shape of a serpent)+ I + X .

In Greek the first letter of Jesus "I" (iota) and the first letter of Christ is “X”(Chi). You can find both sign in SIX , leaded by Serpent ‘S’. We know that in Judeo-Christianity Lucifer/Satan is symbolized as Serpent .

04 – Lets try it in another way . The Greek of ‘Jesus is the Lord’ is the LorD XezVs ChrIstos . In this Greek words we can find some Roman numerals which are written in caps lock . Lets manipulate them :

D + C= 500 +100 = 600
L + X = 50 + 10 = 60
V + I = 5+1 = 6
---------- TOTAL = 666

Okay lets try the name ‘ Jesus is the Lord ‘ in classical Hebrew :

(No display for Hebrew letters )

Their respective numerical values :
60 9 60 200 20 60 7 8 4+4 200 30 4
>> 60 + 289 + 75 + 238 + 4 = 666

And it also adds up to 666 in Hebrew numerals! THE SIGN OF BEAST .

Go...